Bohannon Richard W
Neag School of Education, University of Connecticut, 358 Mansfield Road, Storrs, CT 06269-2101, USA.
Percept Mot Skills. 2006 Aug;103(1):215-22. doi: 10.2466/pms.103.1.215-222.
This meta-analysis was conducted to generate normative values for the 5-repetition sit-to-stand (STS) test suitable for application to individuals at least 60 years of age. A thorough review of the literature yielded 13 papers (14 studies) relevant to this purpose. After the exclusion of potentially unrepresentative data, meta-analysis of these 13 papers indicated that judgments about normal performance should be based on age. Analysis demonstrated that individuals with times for 5 repetitions of this test exceeding the following can be considered to have worse than average performance: 11.4 sec (60 to 69 years), 12.6 sec. (70 to 79 years), and 14.8 sec. (80 to 89 years).
本荟萃分析旨在生成适用于至少60岁个体的5次坐立试验(STS)的规范值。对文献进行全面检索后,得到13篇论文(14项研究)与本目的相关。在排除潜在的非代表性数据后,对这13篇论文进行荟萃分析表明,关于正常表现的判断应基于年龄。分析表明,该测试5次重复用时超过以下时间的个体可被认为表现低于平均水平:11.4秒(60至69岁)、12.6秒(70至79岁)和14.8秒(80至89岁)。