Freyaldenhoven Melinda C, Smiley Donna Fisher, Muenchen Robert A, Konrad Tiffany N
Department of Speech, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA 71272, USA.
J Am Acad Audiol. 2006 Oct;17(9):640-8. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17.9.3.
The present study (1) assessed the reliability of the acceptable noise level (ANL) measure using speech-spectrum and speech-babble noises as the competing stimuli, and (2) investigated the relationship between ANL and preference for background sounds in 30 young adults with normal hearing sensitivity. Listeners were evaluated during three test sessions approximately one week apart. Results demonstrated that ANLs are highly reliable over short periods of time, independent of the background noise distraction. Mean ANLs, however, were affected by type of background noise distraction, indicating ANLs obtained using different competing stimuli should not be compared directly. Results further demonstrated that participants' ratings of preference for background sound were consistent over time; however, listeners' preference for background sound was not related to their acceptance of background noise (i.e., ANL). This may indicate listeners cannot accurately assess their ability to accept background sounds, at least with the questionnaire used in the present study.
本研究(1)使用语音频谱噪声和言语嘈杂声作为竞争刺激,评估了可接受噪声水平(ANL)测量的可靠性,(2)调查了30名听力敏感度正常的年轻成年人的ANL与背景声音偏好之间的关系。在大约相隔一周的三个测试阶段对受试者进行评估。结果表明,ANL在短时间内具有高度可靠性,与背景噪声干扰无关。然而,平均ANL受背景噪声干扰类型的影响,这表明使用不同竞争刺激获得的ANL不应直接比较。结果进一步表明,参与者对背景声音的偏好评分随时间一致;然而,受试者对背景声音的偏好与其对背景噪声的接受程度(即ANL)无关。这可能表明受试者无法准确评估他们接受背景声音的能力,至少在本研究使用的问卷中是如此。