• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对暴露于紫外线照射后的土地分枝杆菌的DNA损伤和修复进行评估。

Assessment of DNA damage and repair in Mycobacterium terrae after exposure to UV irradiation.

作者信息

Bohrerova Z, Linden K G

机构信息

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Microbiol. 2006 Nov;101(5):995-1001. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03023.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03023.x
PMID:17040222
Abstract

AIM

Ultraviolet (UV) irradiation for drinking water treatment was examined for inactivation and subsequent dark and photo-repair of Mycobacterium terrae.

METHODS AND RESULTS

UV sources tested were low pressure (monochromatic, 254 nm) and medium pressure (polychromatic UV output) Hg lamps. UV exposure resulted in inactivation, and was followed by dark or photo-repair experiments. Inactivation and repair were quantified utilizing a molecular-based endonuclease sensitive site (ESS) assay and conventional colony forming unit (CFU) viability assay. Mycobacterium terrae was more resistant to UV disinfection compared to many other bacteria, with approximately 2-log reduction at a UV fluence of 10 mJ cm(-2) ; similar to UV inactivation of M. tuberculosis. There was no difference in inactivation between monochromatic or polychromatic UV lamps. Mycobacterium terrae did not undergo detectable dark repair. Photo-repair resulted in recovery from inactivation by approximately 0.5-log in less than 30 min for both UV lamp systems.

CONCLUSIONS

Mycobacterium terrae is able to photo-repair DNA damage within a short timeframe. The number of pyrimidine dimers induced by UV light were similar for Escherichia coli and M. terrae, however, this similarity did not hold true for viability results.

SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY

There is no practical difference between UV sources for disinfection or prevention of DNA repair for M. terrae. The capability of M. terrae to photo-repair UV damage fairly quickly is important for wastewater treatment applications where disinfected effluent is exposed to sunlight. Finally, molecular based assay results should be evaluated with respect to differences in the nucleic acid content of the test micro-organism.

摘要

目的

研究紫外线(UV)照射用于饮用水处理时对土地分枝杆菌的灭活作用以及随后的暗修复和光修复情况。

方法与结果

测试的紫外线光源为低压(单色,254纳米)和中压(多色紫外线输出)汞灯。紫外线照射导致细菌灭活,随后进行暗修复或光修复实验。利用基于分子的内切酶敏感位点(ESS)测定法和传统的菌落形成单位(CFU)活力测定法对灭活和修复进行定量分析。与许多其他细菌相比,土地分枝杆菌对紫外线消毒更具抗性,在紫外线通量为10 mJ cm(-2) 时约有2个对数级的减少;这与结核分枝杆菌的紫外线灭活情况相似。单色或多色紫外线灯在灭活效果上没有差异。土地分枝杆菌未发生可检测到的暗修复。对于两种紫外线灯系统,光修复在不到30分钟内使细菌从灭活状态恢复约0.5个对数级。

结论

土地分枝杆菌能够在短时间内对DNA损伤进行光修复。大肠杆菌和土地分枝杆菌由紫外线诱导产生的嘧啶二聚体数量相似,然而,在活力结果方面这种相似性并不成立。

研究的意义与影响

对于土地分枝杆菌的消毒或防止DNA修复,紫外线光源之间没有实际差异。土地分枝杆菌能够较快地对紫外线损伤进行光修复,这对于消毒后的废水暴露于阳光下的废水处理应用很重要。最后,应根据测试微生物核酸含量的差异来评估基于分子的测定结果。

相似文献

1
Assessment of DNA damage and repair in Mycobacterium terrae after exposure to UV irradiation.对暴露于紫外线照射后的土地分枝杆菌的DNA损伤和修复进行评估。
J Appl Microbiol. 2006 Nov;101(5):995-1001. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03023.x.
2
Inactivation credit of UV radiation for viruses, bacteria and protozoan (oo)cysts in water: a review.紫外线辐射对水中病毒、细菌和原生动物(卵)囊的灭活作用:综述
Water Res. 2006 Jan;40(1):3-22. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2005.10.030.
3
Efficiency of pyrimidine dimer formation in Escherichia coli across UV wavelengths.大肠杆菌中嘧啶二聚体在不同紫外线波长下的形成效率。
J Appl Microbiol. 2007 Nov;103(5):1650-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03424.x.
4
A comparison of DNA repair and survival of Escherichia coli O157:H7 following exposure to both low- and medium-pressure UV irradiation.大肠杆菌O157:H7在经受低压和中压紫外线照射后DNA修复与存活情况的比较
J Water Health. 2007 Sep;5(3):407-15. doi: 10.2166/wh.2007.036.
5
Assessing the effectiveness of low-pressure ultraviolet light for inactivating Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) micro-organisms.评估低压紫外线对灭活鸟分枝杆菌复合体(MAC)微生物的有效性。
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2008 Nov;47(5):386-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2008.02442.x.
6
Phenotypic persistence and external shielding ultraviolet radiation inactivation kinetic model.表型持久性与外部屏蔽紫外线辐射失活动力学模型。
J Appl Microbiol. 2008 Apr;104(4):1192-202. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03645.x. Epub 2007 Nov 20.
7
Photoreactivation of E. coli depending on light intensity after UV irradiation.紫外线照射后大肠杆菌的光复活作用与光强度的关系
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed. 1992 Mar;192(6):565-70.
8
Re-use of wastewater: preventing the recovery of pathogens by using medium-pressure UV lamp technology.废水再利用:采用中压紫外线灯技术防止病原体复苏。
Water Sci Technol. 2004;50(6):337-44.
9
Standardizing photoreactivation: comparison of DNA photorepair rate in Escherichia coli using four different fluorescent lamps.光复活标准化:使用四种不同荧光灯对大肠杆菌中DNA光修复率的比较
Water Res. 2007 Jun;41(12):2832-8. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.03.015. Epub 2007 Apr 27.
10
Comparative disinfection efficiency of pulsed and continuous-wave UV irradiation technologies.脉冲和连续波紫外线照射技术的比较消毒效率
Water Res. 2008 Jun;42(12):2975-82. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.04.001. Epub 2008 Apr 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of material properties for improved Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm inactivation with 280 nm UV LEDs.材料特性对利用280纳米紫外线发光二极管改善铜绿假单胞菌生物膜灭活的影响
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 23;15(1):31016. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-15192-5.
2
The Antibacterial Efficacy of Far-UVC Light: A Combined-Method Study Exploring the Effects of Experimental and Bacterial Variables on Dose-Response.远紫外线光的抗菌效果:一项综合方法研究,探讨实验和细菌变量对剂量反应的影响。
Pathogens. 2024 Aug 19;13(8):698. doi: 10.3390/pathogens13080698.
3
Sensitivity of Bacteria, Protozoa, Viruses, and Other Microorganisms to Ultraviolet Radiation.
细菌、原生动物、病毒及其他微生物对紫外线辐射的敏感性
J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol. 2021 Aug 20;126:126021. doi: 10.6028/jres.126.021. eCollection 2021.
4
The efficacy of vacuum-ultraviolet light disinfection of some common environmental pathogens.真空紫外线消毒对一些常见环境病原体的效果。
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Feb 11;20(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-4847-9.
5
Ultraviolet germicidal irradiation in tap water contaminated by spp.由[具体菌种]污染的自来水中的紫外线杀菌照射
J Prev Med Hyg. 2017 Dec 30;58(4):E315-E319. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2017.58.4.777. eCollection 2017 Dec.
6
Nanomedicine and advanced technologies for burns: Preventing infection and facilitating wound healing.纳米医学和先进技术在烧伤中的应用:预防感染和促进伤口愈合。
Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018 Jan 1;123:33-64. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
7
The response of aggregated Pseudomonas putida CP1 cells to UV-C and UV-A/B disinfection.聚集的恶臭假单胞菌CP1细胞对UV-C和UV-A/B消毒的反应。
World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016 Nov;32(11):185. doi: 10.1007/s11274-016-2138-9. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
8
Bactericidal effects of 405 nm light exposure demonstrated by inactivation of Escherichia, Salmonella, Shigella, Listeria, and Mycobacterium species in liquid suspensions and on exposed surfaces.405纳米光照对液体悬浮液中和暴露表面上的大肠杆菌、沙门氏菌、志贺氏菌、李斯特菌和分枝杆菌属的灭活作用表明了其杀菌效果。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:137805. doi: 10.1100/2012/137805. Epub 2012 Apr 1.
9
UV light inactivation of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in milk as assessed by FASTPlaqueTB phage assay and culture.通过FASTPlaqueTB噬菌体检测和培养评估牛奶中副结核分枝杆菌鸟亚种的紫外线灭活情况。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Jun;73(11):3728-33. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00057-07. Epub 2007 Apr 13.