Suppr超能文献

线索竞争中的近因-首因转移

Recency-to-primacy shift in cue competition.

作者信息

Lipatova Olga, Wheeler Daniel S, Vadillo Miguel A, Miller Ralph R

机构信息

Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, NY 13902-6000, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2006 Oct;32(4):396-406. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.32.4.396.

Abstract

Three experiments were conducted using a lick-suppression preparation with rats to determine whether temporal and physical context shifts modulate the effectiveness of 2 sequentially trained blocking stimuli. Experiment 1 ascertained that it is possible to obtain blocking by conditioning rats to react to a target cue using 2 different blocking cues, each trained with a single-phase blocking paradigm. Experiment 2 showed that the more recently trained blocking stimulus was more effective (i.e., showed a recency effect) when testing was conducted immediately after training, but a long retention interval attenuated blocking by the most recently trained blocking stimulus and increased blocking by the initially trained blocking stimulus (i.e., a recency-to-primacy shift). This shift from recency to primacy affected in Experiment 2 by varying the retention interval was replicated in Experiment 3 by changing the physical context between training and testing. Taken together, the results indicate that the effectiveness of sequentially trained competing stimuli follows the same recency-to-primacy shift rule that is seen in traditional interference phenomena.

摘要

进行了三项实验,采用对大鼠的舔舐抑制实验准备,以确定时间和物理环境的变化是否会调节两个顺序训练的阻断刺激的有效性。实验1确定,通过使用两种不同的阻断线索对大鼠进行训练,使其对目标线索做出反应,有可能获得阻断效果,每种线索都采用单相阻断范式进行训练。实验2表明,当在训练后立即进行测试时,最近训练的阻断刺激更有效(即表现出近因效应),但较长的保留间隔会减弱最近训练的阻断刺激的阻断效果,并增强最初训练的阻断刺激的阻断效果(即从近因到首因的转变)。在实验2中,通过改变保留间隔从近因到首因的这种转变,在实验3中通过改变训练和测试之间的物理环境得以重现。综合来看,结果表明,顺序训练的竞争刺激的有效性遵循与传统干扰现象中相同的从近因到首因的转变规则。

相似文献

1
Recency-to-primacy shift in cue competition.
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2006 Oct;32(4):396-406. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.32.4.396.
2
Primacy effects induced by temporal or physical context shifts are attenuated by a preshift test trial.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 Feb;60(2):191-210. doi: 10.1080/17470210600790240.
3
Recovery from blocking between outcomes.
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2005 Oct;31(4):467-76. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.31.4.467.
4
Outcome pre- and postexposure effects: retention interval interacts with primacy and recency.
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2004 Oct;30(4):283-98. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.30.4.283.
5
Proactive interference between cues trained with a common outcome in first-order Pavlovian conditioning.
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2003 Oct;29(4):311-22. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.29.4.311.
6
Backward blocking in first-order conditioning.
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Apr;36(2):281-95. doi: 10.1037/a0016773.
7
CS-US temporal relations in blocking.
Learn Behav. 2008 May;36(2):92-103. doi: 10.3758/lb.36.2.92.
9
Some determinants of second-order conditioning.
Learn Behav. 2011 Mar;39(1):12-26. doi: 10.1007/s13420-010-0002-6.
10
Blocking and associability change.
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2013 Jul;39(3):249-58. doi: 10.1037/a0032254. Epub 2013 May 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Another look at the extinction of conditioned flavor preferences: Amount of training and tests for spontaneous recovery.
Learn Behav. 2021 Dec;49(4):405-421. doi: 10.3758/s13420-021-00480-7. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
2
Negative feedback: ants choose unoccupied over occupied food sources and lay more pheromone to them.
J R Soc Interface. 2020 Feb;17(163):20190661. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2019.0661. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
3
Place and Response Learning in the Open-field Tower Maze.
J Vis Exp. 2015 Oct 28(105):e53227. doi: 10.3791/53227.
4
Retrospective revaluation of associative retroactive cue interference.
Learn Behav. 2014 Mar;42(1):47-57. doi: 10.3758/s13420-013-0123-9.
5
Issues in the extinction of specific stimulus-outcome associations in Pavlovian conditioning.
Behav Processes. 2012 May;90(1):9-19. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2012.03.006. Epub 2012 Mar 23.
7
Sensory-specific associations in flavor-preference reversal learning.
Learn Behav. 2009 May;37(2):179-87. doi: 10.3758/LB.37.2.179.

本文引用的文献

2
Counteraction between overshadowing and degraded contingency treatments: support for the extended comparator hypothesis.
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2006 Jan;32(1):21-32. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.32.1.21.
3
Bidirectional associations in humans and rats.
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2005 Jul;31(3):301-18. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.31.3.301.
5
Retrospective revaluation effects in the conditioned suppression procedure.
Q J Exp Psychol B. 2004 Oct;57(4):331-47. doi: 10.1080/02724990344000178.
6
Outcome pre- and postexposure effects: retention interval interacts with primacy and recency.
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2004 Oct;30(4):283-98. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.30.4.283.
7
The basic laws of conditioning differ for elemental cues and cues trained in compound.
Psychol Sci. 2004 Apr;15(4):268-71. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00664.x.
8
Trial spacing is a determinant of cue interaction.
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2003 Jan;29(1):23-38.
9
Associative interference between cues and between outcomes presented together and presented apart: an integration.
Behav Processes. 2002 Apr 28;57(2-3):163-185. doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(02)00012-8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验