• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

松质骨和皮质骨作为正畸复发的危险因素。

Trabecular and cortical bone as risk factors for orthodontic relapse.

作者信息

Rothe Laura E, Bollen Anne-Marie, Little Robert M, Herring Susan W, Chaison Jeremy B, Chen Curtis S-K, Hollender Lars G

机构信息

School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash 98195, USA.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Oct;130(4):476-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.03.023.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.03.023
PMID:17045147
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Dental relapse of the mandibular incisors after orthodontic treatment is a common problem, and few risk factors have been identified. The purpose of this case-control study was to evaluate whether the amount or the structure of mandibular bone affects the potential for postorthodontic mandibular incisor relapse.

METHODS

The subject sample was selected from the postretention database at the University of Washington. Subjects were chosen based on the availability of lateral cephalograms and mandibular periapical radiographs taken approximately 10 years postretention (T3). The mandibular incisor irregularity index (II) was measured on the T3 casts. Two groups were identified: subjects with the II greater than 6 mm (relapse or case) and those with the II less than 3.5 mm (stable or control). Once the case/control status was determined, the II was measured on models taken at the initial orthodontic examination (T1) and at the end of treatment (T2). Sixty relapse and 263 stable subjects were identified. Mandibular cortical thickness measured on both panoramic and lateral cephalometric radiographs was used to assess the amount of mandibular bone, and fractal analysis was used to analyze the trabecular bone structure around the mandibular incisors on the periapical radiographs. Logistic regression analyses were used to determine the association between dental relapse and significant bone parameters. The models were adjusted for potentially confounding variables (initial II, sex, age, and postretention time).

RESULTS

The relapse subjects had a larger mean II at T1 and a longer postretention time than the stable subjects. The mean cephalometric mandibular cortical thickness was significantly smaller in the relapse group than in the stable group at T1, T2, and T3. There were no statistically significant differences in the trabecular structure of bone, as measured with fractal analyses, between the relapse and stable groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that patients with thinner mandibular cortices are at increased risk for dental relapse.

摘要

引言

正畸治疗后下颌切牙的牙齿复发是一个常见问题,且已确定的风险因素较少。本病例对照研究的目的是评估下颌骨的量或结构是否会影响正畸治疗后下颌切牙复发的可能性。

方法

研究对象样本选自华盛顿大学的保持后数据库。根据大约保持后10年(T3)拍摄的头颅侧位片和下颌根尖片的可获得性选择研究对象。在T3模型上测量下颌切牙不整齐指数(II)。确定了两组:II大于6mm的研究对象(复发组或病例组)和II小于3.5mm的研究对象(稳定组或对照组)。一旦确定病例/对照状态,就在正畸初始检查(T1)和治疗结束时(T2)拍摄的模型上测量II。确定了60例复发研究对象和263例稳定研究对象。在全景片和头颅侧位片上测量的下颌皮质厚度用于评估下颌骨的量,并且使用分形分析来分析根尖片上下颌切牙周围的骨小梁结构。使用逻辑回归分析来确定牙齿复发与显著骨参数之间的关联。模型针对潜在的混杂变量(初始II、性别、年龄和保持后时间)进行了调整。

结果

复发组研究对象在T1时的平均II更大,且保持后时间比稳定组更长。在T1、T2和T3时,复发组的平均头颅侧位下颌皮质厚度显著小于稳定组。复发组和稳定组之间,通过分形分析测量的骨小梁结构没有统计学上的显著差异。

结论

这些结果表明,下颌皮质较薄的患者牙齿复发风险增加。

相似文献

1
Trabecular and cortical bone as risk factors for orthodontic relapse.松质骨和皮质骨作为正畸复发的危险因素。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Oct;130(4):476-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.03.023.
2
Relapse of mandibular incisor alignment is not associated with the total posttreatment mandibular rotation.下颌切牙排列的复发与治疗后下颌的总旋转无关。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Oct;138(4):392.e1-392.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.04.024.
3
Mandibular growth rotation effects on postretention stability of mandibular incisor alignment.下颌生长旋转对下颌切牙排列保持后稳定性的影响。
Angle Orthod. 2007 Mar;77(2):199-205. doi: 10.2319/0003-3219(2007)077[0199:MGREOP]2.0.CO;2.
4
Effects of posttreatment skeletal maturity measured with the cervical vertebral maturation method on incisor alignment relapse.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Aug;134(2):238-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.09.060.
5
Relapse of anterior crowding in patients treated with extraction and nonextraction of premolars.拔除和不拔除前磨牙治疗患者的前牙拥挤复发情况。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Jun;129(6):775-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.02.022.
6
Correlation between mandibular incisor crown morphologic index and postretention stability.下颌切牙冠形态指数与保持后稳定性之间的相关性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Apr;129(4):559-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.10.019.
7
Incisor stability in patients with anterior rotational mandibular growth.
Angle Orthod. 1995;65(6):431-42. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1995)065<0431:ISIPWA>2.0.CO;2.
8
Evaluation of the influence of mandibular third molars on mandibular anterior crowding relapse.评价下颌第三磨牙对下颌前牙拥挤复发的影响。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2020 May;78(4):297-302. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2019.1703142. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
9
Alteration of masticatory electromyographic activity and stability of orthognathic surgery in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion.骨性III类错颌畸形患者咀嚼肌肌电活动的改变及正颌外科手术的稳定性
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Jul;71(7):1249-60. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.01.002. Epub 2013 Apr 4.
10
Long-term skeletal and dental stability of mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis with a hybrid distractor.带混合牵开器的下颌骨联合牵张成骨的长期骨骼和牙齿稳定性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Jan;141(1):60-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.06.030.

引用本文的文献

1
Fractal Dimension Analysis of Mandibular Trabecular Architecture in Gingival Recession During Orthodontic Retention: A Cross-Sectional Study.正畸保持期牙龈退缩时下颌骨小梁结构的分形维数分析:一项横断面研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Apr 16;15(8):1013. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15081013.
2
Comparative Assessment of the Fenestration, Dehiscence Frequency and Facial Bone Thickness in the Maxillary Anterior Region of Smokers Versus Non-Smokers: A Cross-Sectional Study.吸烟者与非吸烟者上颌前部区域开窗、裂隙频率及面骨厚度的比较评估:一项横断面研究
Int J Dent. 2025 Apr 19;2025:9783707. doi: 10.1155/ijod/9783707. eCollection 2025.
3
Simultaneous labial and lingual augmented corticotomy assisted presurgical orthodontics in class III patients: the morphological aspects of the mandibular anterior ridge with cone-beam computed tomography.
唇颊侧联合皮质骨切开术辅助下颌前导术矫治安氏 III 类错颌畸形:锥形束 CT 在下颌前牙区牙槽嵴形态变化中的研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Sep 17;28(10):529. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05805-0.
4
Long-term bone remodeling of maxillary anterior teeth with post-treatment alveolar bone defect in adult patients with maxillary protrusion: a prospective follow-up study.成人上颌前突患者治疗后牙槽骨缺损的上颌前牙长期骨重塑:一项前瞻性随访研究。
Prog Orthod. 2023 Nov 6;24(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40510-023-00489-w.
5
The clinical efficacy of periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics in patients with bone fenestration and dehiscence: a retrospective study.牙周加速成骨正畸治疗骨开窗和骨开裂患者的临床疗效:一项回顾性研究。
Head Face Med. 2022 Dec 8;18(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13005-022-00344-z.
6
Utility of radiomorphometrics indexes of the mandible for age estimation in adults.下颌骨放射形态计量学指标在成年人年龄推断中的应用。
J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2022 Apr 30;40(1):20-33.
7
Efficacy of low dose and ultra-low dose on the visibility of peri-implant fenestration and dehiscences: a computed tomography study.低剂量和超低剂量对种植体周围开窗和骨缺损可视性的疗效:一项计算机断层扫描研究
Pol J Radiol. 2022 Jan 7;87:e24-e29. doi: 10.5114/pjr.2022.112466. eCollection 2022.
8
Prevalence of posterior alveolar bony dehiscence and fenestration in adults with posterior crossbite: a CBCT study.成人后牙反牙合后牙槽骨开裂和开窗的患病率:CBCT 研究。
Prog Orthod. 2020 Mar 16;21(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40510-020-00308-6.
9
Use of fractal analysis in dental images: a systematic review.分形分析在牙科图像中的应用:系统评价。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2020 Feb;49(2):20180457. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20180457. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
10
Appraisal of the relationship between tooth inclination, dehiscence, fenestration, and sagittal skeletal pattern with cone beam computed tomography.应用锥形束 CT 评估牙倾斜、裂缺、开窗及矢状骨型之间的关系。
Angle Orthod. 2019 Jul;89(4):544-551. doi: 10.2319/050818-344.1. Epub 2019 Feb 11.