Schuchert A, Hopf M, Kuck K H, Bleifeld W
Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, West Germany.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1990 Dec;13(12 Pt 2):1879-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1990.tb06908.x.
The aim of steroid-eluting leads is to reduce chronic pacing thresholds. Whether steroid-eluting leads also modify acute and chronic R wave amplitudes as well as R wave sensing of the pulse generator was investigated in 31 patients with a unipolar ventricular pacemaker. Four different leads were implanted: Two steroid-eluting leads with different electrode surface areas (8 mm2 and 5.8 mm2) and two conventional leads (Target Tip, Elgiloy lead). At implantation filtered R wave amplitudes, peak-to-peak values, and slew rates were measured by a pacing system analyzer. One year after implantation R wave amplitudes were directly determined from intracardiac electrograms and compared to the peak-to-peak data at implantation. Additionally, R wave inhibition was evaluated at a sensitivity setting of 5 mV. There were no differences among the four leads in respect to any of the parameters studied at implantation. At follow-up, no differences in R wave amplitudes were found leading to an appropriate sensing in all leads. Steroid-eluting leads did not differ from conventional leads and a smaller electrode surface area of 5.8 mm2 had no influence on ventricular electrogram. Together with a pacemaker with an input impedance of 37 kohms R wave sensing was a correct setting of 5 mV.
类固醇洗脱导线的目的是降低慢性起搏阈值。在31名单极心室起搏器患者中,研究了类固醇洗脱导线是否还会改变急性和慢性R波振幅以及脉冲发生器的R波感知。植入了四种不同的导线:两种具有不同电极表面积(8平方毫米和5.8平方毫米)的类固醇洗脱导线以及两种传统导线(Target Tip、埃尔吉洛伊合金导线)。在植入时,通过起搏系统分析仪测量滤波后的R波振幅、峰峰值和上升速率。植入一年后,直接从心内电图确定R波振幅,并与植入时的峰峰值数据进行比较。此外,在5 mV的灵敏度设置下评估R波抑制。在植入时研究的任何参数方面,四种导线之间均无差异。在随访中,未发现R波振幅存在差异,所有导线的感知均正常。类固醇洗脱导线与传统导线没有区别,5.8平方毫米的较小电极表面积对心室电图没有影响。对于输入阻抗为37千欧的起搏器,5 mV是正确的R波感知设置。