Suppr超能文献

粒细胞集落刺激因子改善创伤性不完全性脊髓损伤患者的神经和功能预后:一项系统评价与荟萃分析

Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor Improves Neurological and Functional Outcomes in Patients With Traumatic Incomplete Spinal Cord Injuries: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analyses.

作者信息

Weisbrod Luke J, Nilles-Melchert Thomas T, Bergjord Judith R, Surdell Daniel L

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.

Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.

出版信息

Neurotrauma Rep. 2024 May 2;5(1):467-482. doi: 10.1089/neur.2023.0099. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a cause for significant morbidity, often resulting in long-term disability. We compared outcomes after administration of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) versus controls. MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library database searches yielded 222 records; six met study inclusion criteria. Fixed-effect and random-effects models were used to establish odds ratios (ORs) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each outcome. The results of the pooled analysis showed that in patients with incomplete SCI, G-CSF resulted in increased American Spinal Cord Injury Association (ASIA) motor scores at 3 months (MD = 0.57 [95% CI = 0.04, 1.10],  = 63.84%,  = 0.036), 6 months (MD = 4.18 [95% CI = 0.55, 7.80],  = 98.75%,  = 0.024), change in ASIA pinprick scores at 6 months (MD = 3.38 [95% CI = 1.48, 5.28],  = 89.78%,  < 0.001), and increased Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) III score at 6 months (MD = 3.27 [95% CI = 1.13, 5.41],  = 91.86%,  = 0.003). G-CSF resulted in more adverse events than the non-MP control groups (OR = 1.44 [95% CI = 0.38, 2.50],  = 0%,  = 0.008), but fewer than the MP control groups (OR = -4.2 [95% CI = -5.72, -2.68],  = 0%,  < 0.001). Systemic white blood cell count increased after administration of G-CSF in comparison to baseline (MD = 3.57 [95% CI = 2.79, 4.35],  = 55.06%,  < 0.001). G-CSF did not statistically increase ASIA Impairment Scale at 3 months (MD = 0.48 [95% CI = -0.33, 1.28],  = 0%,  = 0.246) or at 6 months (MD = 1.84 [95% CI = -0.10, 3.79],  = 50.09%,  = 0.063). These meta-analyses of six studies suggest that G-CSF for the treatment of incomplete SCI may result in improved neurological outcomes when compared to the controls. The results are limited by a small sample size with heterogeneity between studies. More robust prospective, randomized studies are necessary to help inform the safety and efficacy of G-CSF.

摘要

脊髓损伤(SCI)是导致严重发病的原因,常造成长期残疾。我们比较了给予粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)与对照组后的结果。检索MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库得到222条记录;6项符合研究纳入标准。使用固定效应和随机效应模型确定每个结果的比值比(OR)和平均差(MD)以及95%置信区间(CI)。汇总分析结果显示,在不完全性SCI患者中,G-CSF使3个月时美国脊髓损伤协会(ASIA)运动评分增加(MD = 0.57 [95% CI = 0.04, 1.10],I² = 63.84%,P = 0.036),6个月时增加(MD = 4.18 [95% CI = 0.55, 7.80],I² = 98.75%,P = 0.024),6个月时ASIA针刺觉评分变化增加(MD = 3.38 [95% CI = 1.48, 5.28],I² = 89.78%,P < 0.001),6个月时脊髓独立测量(SCIM)III评分增加(MD = 3.27 [95% CI = 1.13, 5.41],I² = 91.86%,P = 0.003)。G-CSF导致的不良事件比非甲基强的松龙(MP)对照组多(OR = 1.44 [95% CI = 0.38, 2.50],I² = 0%,P = 0.008),但比MP对照组少(OR = -4.2 [95% CI = -5.72, -2.68],I² = 0%,P < 0.001)。与基线相比,给予G-CSF后全身白细胞计数增加(MD = 3.57 [95% CI = 2.79, 4.35],I² = 55.06%,P < 0.001)。G-CSF在3个月(MD = 0.48 [95% CI = -0.33, 1.28],I² = 0%,P = 0.246)或6个月(MD = 1.84 [95% CI = -0.10, 3.79],I² = 50.09%,P = 0.063)时未使ASIA损伤分级有统计学意义的增加。这六项研究的荟萃分析表明,与对照组相比,G-CSF治疗不完全性SCI可能会改善神经学结果。结果受到样本量小和研究间异质性的限制。需要更有力的前瞻性随机研究来了解G-CSF的安全性和有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15c8/11579545/3b76533e2304/neur.2023.0099_figure1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验