Weisbrod Luke J, Nilles-Melchert Thomas T, Bergjord Judith R, Surdell Daniel L
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Neurotrauma Rep. 2024 May 2;5(1):467-482. doi: 10.1089/neur.2023.0099. eCollection 2024.
Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a cause for significant morbidity, often resulting in long-term disability. We compared outcomes after administration of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) versus controls. MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library database searches yielded 222 records; six met study inclusion criteria. Fixed-effect and random-effects models were used to establish odds ratios (ORs) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each outcome. The results of the pooled analysis showed that in patients with incomplete SCI, G-CSF resulted in increased American Spinal Cord Injury Association (ASIA) motor scores at 3 months (MD = 0.57 [95% CI = 0.04, 1.10], = 63.84%, = 0.036), 6 months (MD = 4.18 [95% CI = 0.55, 7.80], = 98.75%, = 0.024), change in ASIA pinprick scores at 6 months (MD = 3.38 [95% CI = 1.48, 5.28], = 89.78%, < 0.001), and increased Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) III score at 6 months (MD = 3.27 [95% CI = 1.13, 5.41], = 91.86%, = 0.003). G-CSF resulted in more adverse events than the non-MP control groups (OR = 1.44 [95% CI = 0.38, 2.50], = 0%, = 0.008), but fewer than the MP control groups (OR = -4.2 [95% CI = -5.72, -2.68], = 0%, < 0.001). Systemic white blood cell count increased after administration of G-CSF in comparison to baseline (MD = 3.57 [95% CI = 2.79, 4.35], = 55.06%, < 0.001). G-CSF did not statistically increase ASIA Impairment Scale at 3 months (MD = 0.48 [95% CI = -0.33, 1.28], = 0%, = 0.246) or at 6 months (MD = 1.84 [95% CI = -0.10, 3.79], = 50.09%, = 0.063). These meta-analyses of six studies suggest that G-CSF for the treatment of incomplete SCI may result in improved neurological outcomes when compared to the controls. The results are limited by a small sample size with heterogeneity between studies. More robust prospective, randomized studies are necessary to help inform the safety and efficacy of G-CSF.
脊髓损伤(SCI)是导致严重发病的原因,常造成长期残疾。我们比较了给予粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)与对照组后的结果。检索MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库得到222条记录;6项符合研究纳入标准。使用固定效应和随机效应模型确定每个结果的比值比(OR)和平均差(MD)以及95%置信区间(CI)。汇总分析结果显示,在不完全性SCI患者中,G-CSF使3个月时美国脊髓损伤协会(ASIA)运动评分增加(MD = 0.57 [95% CI = 0.04, 1.10],I² = 63.84%,P = 0.036),6个月时增加(MD = 4.18 [95% CI = 0.55, 7.80],I² = 98.75%,P = 0.024),6个月时ASIA针刺觉评分变化增加(MD = 3.38 [95% CI = 1.48, 5.28],I² = 89.78%,P < 0.001),6个月时脊髓独立测量(SCIM)III评分增加(MD = 3.27 [95% CI = 1.13, 5.41],I² = 91.86%,P = 0.003)。G-CSF导致的不良事件比非甲基强的松龙(MP)对照组多(OR = 1.44 [95% CI = 0.38, 2.50],I² = 0%,P = 0.008),但比MP对照组少(OR = -4.2 [95% CI = -5.72, -2.68],I² = 0%,P < 0.001)。与基线相比,给予G-CSF后全身白细胞计数增加(MD = 3.57 [95% CI = 2.79, 4.35],I² = 55.06%,P < 0.001)。G-CSF在3个月(MD = 0.48 [95% CI = -0.33, 1.28],I² = 0%,P = 0.246)或6个月(MD = 1.84 [95% CI = -0.10, 3.79],I² = 50.09%,P = 0.063)时未使ASIA损伤分级有统计学意义的增加。这六项研究的荟萃分析表明,与对照组相比,G-CSF治疗不完全性SCI可能会改善神经学结果。结果受到样本量小和研究间异质性的限制。需要更有力的前瞻性随机研究来了解G-CSF的安全性和有效性。