Suppr超能文献

利奈唑胺与万古霉素治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌椎间盘炎的疗效:对照动物模型

Efficacy of linezolid versus vancomycin in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus discitis: a controlled animal model.

作者信息

Conaughty Jason M, Chen Jack, Martinez Octavio V, Chiappetta Gino, Brookfield Kathleen F, Eismont Frank J

机构信息

Vanderbilt University Medical Center, MCE South Tower, Suite 400, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Oct 15;31(22):E830-2. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000241065.19723.13.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

A rabbit model was used to assess the efficacy of linezolid and vancomycin for the treatment of discitis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Nontreated controls were used for comparison.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine if there was a therapeutic difference between using linezolid and vancomycin in the treatment of MRSA discitis.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Vancomycin is currently the gold standard treatment for medical management of MRSA discitis. Linezolid is a relatively new drug that has been approved for treatment of MRSA infections, but currently there is no research demonstrating its efficacy at treating infections of the disc space.

METHODS

Twenty-four rabbits were inoculated with MRSA at two adjacent lumbar disc spaces via an anterior retroperitoneal approach. Six rabbits were to receive only pain medication and to serve as controls. Ten rabbits were assigned to a 5-day course of intravenous vancomycin, and 8 were assigned to a 5-day course of intravenous linezolid. Disc spaces were sent for quantitative culture after the 5-day treatment course.

RESULTS

The mean culture growth for the disc spaces was not statistically different between the linezolid treated group and the nontreated controls. While vancomycin treatment did lead to lower bacterial loads when compared with controls, the reduction was not statistically significant. When bacterial counts for the vancomycin group and linezolid group were compared, vancomycin treatment resulted in less bacterial growth. This difference was statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Linezolid is a clinically attractive alternative to vancomycin due to its mild side effect profile and oral bioavailability. However, in this MRSA discitis model with a short treatment course, vancomycin was superior to linezolid.

摘要

研究设计

采用兔模型评估利奈唑胺和万古霉素治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)所致椎间盘炎的疗效。设置未治疗的对照组进行比较。

目的

本研究旨在确定利奈唑胺和万古霉素治疗MRSA椎间盘炎是否存在治疗差异。

背景资料总结

万古霉素目前是MRSA椎间盘炎药物治疗的金标准。利奈唑胺是一种相对较新的已被批准用于治疗MRSA感染的药物,但目前尚无研究证明其治疗椎间盘间隙感染的疗效。

方法

通过腹膜后前路途径在24只兔的两个相邻腰椎间盘间隙接种MRSA。6只兔仅接受止痛药物作为对照。10只兔接受为期5天的静脉注射万古霉素治疗,8只兔接受为期5天的静脉注射利奈唑胺治疗。5天治疗疗程结束后,将椎间盘间隙送去进行定量培养。

结果

利奈唑胺治疗组与未治疗对照组之间椎间盘间隙的平均培养生长无统计学差异。虽然与对照组相比,万古霉素治疗确实导致细菌载量降低,但降低幅度无统计学意义。比较万古霉素组和利奈唑胺组的细菌计数时,万古霉素治疗导致的细菌生长较少。这种差异具有统计学意义。

结论

利奈唑胺因其副作用轻微和口服生物利用度高,是临床上有吸引力的万古霉素替代药物。然而,在这个治疗疗程较短的MRSA椎间盘炎模型中,万古霉素优于利奈唑胺。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验