Young D, McLeish L, Sullivan F, Pitkethly M, Reis M, Goudie D, Vysny H, Ozakinci G, Steel M
Tayside Breast Cancer Family Clinic, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK.
Br J Cancer. 2006 Oct 23;95(8):974-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603389. Epub 2006 Oct 3.
Up to 40% of referrals from primary care to 'breast cancer family clinics' prove to be of women whose assessed risk falls below the guidelines' threshold for management in secondary or tertiary care, despite recommendations that they should be screened out at primary care level. A randomised trial, involving 87 such women referred to the Tayside Familial Breast Cancer Service compared two ways of communicating risk information, letter or personal interview. Both were found to be acceptable to referred women and to their family doctors, although the former expressed a slight preference for interview. Only four women returned to their family doctors with continuing concerns about breast cancer. Nevertheless, understanding of information provided by either route was unsatisfactory, with apparent confusion about both absolute and relative risks of breast cancer. Substantial minorities appear to believe that they are at no increased risk at all, or even below the population level of risk, while others remain convinced that their personal risk has been underestimated. Family history record forms, completed by the referred women, preferably with the assistance of relatives, are crucial to full assessment of familial risk but one quarter of women referred to the Tayside Familial Breast Cancer Service currently do not complete and return these forms ahead of their clinic appointment. Further collaboration between primary care and the Breast Cancer Family Service is required to improve provision for concerned women whose risks fall below the threshold for special surveillance and to maximise effective use of the family history record form.
高达40%从初级保健机构转介至“乳腺癌家庭诊所”的女性,经评估其风险低于二级或三级护理管理指南规定的阈值,尽管有建议称她们应在初级保健层面被筛查出来。一项随机试验纳入了87名被转介至泰赛德家族性乳腺癌服务机构的此类女性,比较了两种传达风险信息的方式:信件或个人面谈。结果发现,这两种方式对于被转介的女性及其家庭医生来说都是可以接受的,不过前者稍微倾向于面谈。只有四名女性因持续担心乳腺癌而回到她们的家庭医生处。然而,通过这两种方式提供的信息的理解情况并不理想,对乳腺癌的绝对风险和相对风险都明显存在困惑。相当一部分少数人似乎认为自己根本没有增加风险,甚至低于人群风险水平,而其他人仍然坚信自己的个人风险被低估了。由被转介的女性填写的家族病史记录表格,最好在亲属协助下完成,对于全面评估家族风险至关重要,但目前转介至泰赛德家族性乳腺癌服务机构的女性中有四分之一没有在诊所预约前填写并返还这些表格。初级保健机构与乳腺癌家庭服务机构需要进一步合作,以改善对风险低于特殊监测阈值的相关女性的服务,并最大限度地有效利用家族病史记录表格。