Cortese Michael J, Watson Jason M, Khanna Maya M, McCallion Mathie
College of Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Jun;13(3):446-51. doi: 10.3758/bf03193868.
In three experiments,we examined the relationship between orthographic andphonological distinctiveness and incidental recall. In each experiment, participants were given a surprise free recalltest after they read words aloud as quickly and accurately as possible. The pattern of results replicated those reported in Cortese, Watson, Wang, and Fugett (2004) for intentional and explicit free recall and recognition memory tasks in which items were read silently. Specifically, we found that phonological-to-orthographic neighborhood size influenced recall performance,whereas orthographic-to-phonologicalconsistency and phonological-to-orthographic consistency did not Also, we failed to replicate the orthographic-to-phonological consistency effect reported by Hirshman and Jackson (1997), and argue that their results were due to a confounding of consistency with phonological neighborhood size. Our results suggest that the processing of words sharing both orthography and phonology with a large number of words produces interference that reduces one's ability to remember them.
在三项实验中,我们研究了正字法和语音独特性与附带回忆之间的关系。在每项实验中,参与者在尽可能快速准确地大声朗读单词后,会接受一次意外的自由回忆测试。结果模式重复了科尔特斯、沃森、王和富格特(2004年)针对默读项目的有意和明确自由回忆及识别记忆任务所报告的结果。具体而言,我们发现语音到正字法的邻域大小会影响回忆表现,而正字法到语音的一致性以及语音到正字法的一致性则不会。此外,我们未能重复赫什曼和杰克逊(1997年)报告的正字法到语音的一致性效应,并认为他们的结果是由于一致性与语音邻域大小的混淆所致。我们的结果表明,与大量单词共享正字法和语音的单词处理会产生干扰,从而降低一个人记住它们的能力。