Frisson Steven, Bélanger Nathalie N, Rayner Keith
a School of Psychology, University of Birmingham , Edgbaston , UK.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(9):1742-67. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.869614. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
We investigated how orthographic and phonological information is activated during reading, using a fast priming task, and during single-word recognition, using masked priming. Specifically, different types of overlap between prime and target were contrasted: high orthographic and high phonological overlap (track-crack), high orthographic and low phonological overlap (bear-gear), or low orthographic and high phonological overlap (fruit-chute). In addition, we examined whether (orthographic) beginning overlap (swoop-swoon) yielded the same priming pattern as end (rhyme) overlap (track-crack). Prime durations were 32 and 50 ms in the fast priming version and 50 ms in the masked priming version, and mode of presentation (prime and target in lower case) was identical. The fast priming experiment showed facilitatory priming effects when both orthography and phonology overlapped, with no apparent differences between beginning and end overlap pairs. Facilitation was also found when prime and target only overlapped orthographically. In contrast, the masked priming experiment showed inhibition for both types of end overlap pairs (with and without phonological overlap) and no difference for begin overlap items. When prime and target only shared principally phonological information, facilitation was only found with a long prime duration in the fast priming experiment, while no differences were found in the masked priming version. These contrasting results suggest that fast priming and masked priming do not necessarily tap into the same type of processing.
我们使用快速启动任务研究了在阅读过程中拼写和语音信息是如何被激活的,并使用掩蔽启动研究了在单字识别过程中它们是如何被激活的。具体而言,我们对比了启动刺激和目标刺激之间不同类型的重叠情况:高拼写和高语音重叠(track - crack)、高拼写和低语音重叠(bear - gear)或低拼写和高语音重叠(fruit - chute)。此外,我们还研究了(拼写)开头重叠(swoop - swoon)是否会产生与结尾(押韵)重叠(track - crack)相同的启动模式。在快速启动版本中,启动刺激的持续时间为32毫秒和50毫秒,在掩蔽启动版本中为50毫秒,呈现方式(启动刺激和目标刺激均为小写)相同。快速启动实验表明,当拼写和语音都重叠时会产生促进性的启动效应,开头和结尾重叠对之间没有明显差异。当启动刺激和目标刺激仅在拼写上重叠时也发现了促进作用。相比之下,掩蔽启动实验表明,对于两种类型的结尾重叠对(有和没有语音重叠)都有抑制作用,而开头重叠项目则没有差异。当启动刺激和目标刺激主要仅共享语音信息时,在快速启动实验中仅在长启动刺激持续时间时发现促进作用,而在掩蔽启动版本中未发现差异。这些对比结果表明,快速启动和掩蔽启动不一定涉及相同类型的加工过程。