• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

饥饿驱动阈值触发通信。

Starvation drives a threshold triggering communication.

作者信息

Mailleux Anne-Catherine, Detrain Claire, Deneubourg Jean-Louis

机构信息

Unit of Social Ecology, Free University of Brussels, Brussels B-1050, Belgium.

出版信息

J Exp Biol. 2006 Nov;209(Pt 21):4224-9. doi: 10.1242/jeb.02461.

DOI:10.1242/jeb.02461
PMID:17050837
Abstract

The decision for an ant forager to launch recruitment is governed by an internal response threshold. Here, we demonstrate that this threshold (the desired volume) triggering trail-laying increases under starvation. As a consequence, highly starved foragers lay a recruitment trail and bring back to the nest higher quantities of food from large unlimited resources. In contrast, when the volume of the food source is under their crop capacity, the percentage of trail-communicating foragers is lower following a prolonged period of starvation. Such starvation-dependent changes in the "desired volume" threshold explain how ants optimize recruitment and select liquid food resources in order to prevent collective exploitation of low profitability.

摘要

蚂蚁觅食者决定发起招募行为受内部反应阈值的控制。在此,我们证明,引发留下踪迹行为的这个阈值(期望体积)在饥饿状态下会升高。因此,极度饥饿的觅食者会留下招募踪迹,并从大量无限制的资源中带回更多食物回巢。相比之下,当食物源的体积在它们嗉囊容量之下时,经过长时间饥饿后,进行踪迹交流的觅食者比例较低。“期望体积”阈值中这种依赖饥饿的变化解释了蚂蚁如何优化招募行为并选择液体食物资源,以防止对低收益资源的集体过度开发。

相似文献

1
Starvation drives a threshold triggering communication.饥饿驱动阈值触发通信。
J Exp Biol. 2006 Nov;209(Pt 21):4224-9. doi: 10.1242/jeb.02461.
2
Food transport in ants: Do Lasius niger foragers maximize their individual load?蚂蚁的食物运输:黑褐蚁觅食者会使个体负载最大化吗?
C R Biol. 2009 May;332(5):500-6. doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2008.10.005. Epub 2008 Dec 19.
3
Triggering and persistence of trail-laying in foragers of the ant Lasius niger.黑蚁觅食者中踪迹标记的触发与持续存在
J Insect Physiol. 2005 Mar;51(3):297-304. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2004.12.001.
4
Regulation of ants' foraging to resource productivity.蚂蚁觅食对资源生产力的调节。
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Aug 7;270(1524):1609-16. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2398.
5
Optimality of collective choices: a stochastic approach.集体选择的最优性:一种随机方法。
Bull Math Biol. 2003 Sep;65(5):795-808. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8240(03)00040-5.
6
Leader-based and self-organized communication: modelling group-mass recruitment in ants.基于领导者的和自组织的通信:蚂蚁中的群体-大量招募建模。
J Theor Biol. 2012 Nov 21;313:79-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.07.025. Epub 2012 Aug 5.
7
[The specialisation in ant working groups involved in trophobiosis with aphids].[参与与蚜虫进行营养共生的蚂蚁工蚁群体的专业化]
Zh Obshch Biol. 2008 Jul-Aug;69(4):284-93.
8
How patrollers set foraging direction in harvester ants.巡逻蚁如何确定收获蚁的觅食方向。
Am Nat. 2007 Dec;170(6):943-8. doi: 10.1086/522843.
9
Trail geometry gives polarity to ant foraging networks.路径几何结构赋予蚂蚁觅食网络极性。
Nature. 2004 Dec 16;432(7019):907-9. doi: 10.1038/nature03105.
10
Foraging energetics of a nectar-feeding ant: metabolic expenditure as a function of food-source profitability.一种以花蜜为食的蚂蚁的觅食能量学:代谢消耗与食物源盈利能力的关系
J Exp Biol. 2006 Oct;209(Pt 20):4091-101. doi: 10.1242/jeb.02478.

引用本文的文献

1
Ants combine object affordance with latent learning to make efficient foraging decisions.蚂蚁将目标可及性与潜在学习相结合,从而做出高效的觅食决策。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Aug 29;120(35):e2302654120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2302654120. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
2
Bundling and segregation affect pheromone deposition, but not choice, in an ant.捆绑和隔离会影响蚂蚁信息素的沉积,但不会影响其选择。
Elife. 2022 Nov 22;11:e79314. doi: 10.7554/eLife.79314.
3
A Data-Driven Simulation of the Trophallactic Network and Intranidal Food Flow Dissemination in Ants.
基于数据驱动的蚂蚁交哺网络及巢内食物流传播模拟
Animals (Basel). 2022 Oct 28;12(21):2963. doi: 10.3390/ani12212963.
4
Colony specificity and starvation-driven changes in activity patterns of the red ant Myrmica rubra.红火蚁的群体特异性和饥饿驱动的活动模式变化。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 12;17(8):e0273087. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273087. eCollection 2022.
5
Hive geometry shapes the recruitment rate of honeybee colonies.蜂巢几何形状决定了蜜蜂群体的招募率。
J Math Biol. 2021 Jul 29;83(2):20. doi: 10.1007/s00285-021-01644-9.
6
Hard limits to cognitive flexibility: ants can learn to ignore but not avoid pheromone trails.认知灵活性的硬性限制:蚂蚁可以学会忽略但不能避免信息素踪迹。
J Exp Biol. 2021 Jun 1;224(11). doi: 10.1242/jeb.242454. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
7
Regulation of Ant Foraging: A Review of the Role of Information Use and Personality.蚂蚁觅食的调控:信息利用与个性作用的综述
Front Psychol. 2020 Apr 28;11:734. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00734. eCollection 2020.
8
Negative feedback: ants choose unoccupied over occupied food sources and lay more pheromone to them.负反馈:蚂蚁选择未被占据的食物源而不是被占据的食物源,并在这些食物源上释放更多的信息素。
J R Soc Interface. 2020 Feb;17(163):20190661. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2019.0661. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
9
Positive and negative incentive contrasts lead to relative value perception in ants.正、负激励对比导致蚂蚁产生相对价值感知。
Elife. 2019 Jul 2;8:e45450. doi: 10.7554/eLife.45450.
10
Effect of the land area elevation on the collective choice in ants.土地面积升高对蚂蚁集体选择的影响。
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 18;7(1):8745. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08592-9.