Andre P, Capo C, Benoliel A M, Bongrand P, Rouge F, Aubert C
Laboratoire d'Immunologie, Hôpital de Sainte-Marguerite, Marseille, France.
Cell Biophys. 1990 Oct;17(2):163-80. doi: 10.1007/BF02990495.
The concept of cell adhesiveness was analyzed by looking for correlations between the adhesive behavior and measurable biological properties of different cell populations. Ten established lines of melanoma cells were assayed for passive deformability (by micropipet aspiration), active spreading (by measuring the height/diameter ratio after incubation on different surfaces), density and mobility of concanavalin A binding sites (by quantitative analysis of fluorescence microscopic images), spontaneous and concanavalin A-mediated agglutination (by measuring the number of cell conjugates resisting calibrated shearing forces), and binding to glass capillary tubes (with a quantitative assay of binding strength). Forty-four different parameters were thus measured, and each set of determinations was repeated 2 or 3 t at different days on each cell line. Analysis of variance was performed to assess the capacity of each parameter to discriminate between different lines. Correlations between different parameters were studied in order to understand a possible influence of cell intrinsic properties on the behavior of individual cells. The following conclusions were suggested by experimental data 1. Cell spreading ability, resistance to slow deformation within a micropipette and ability to form shear-resistant bonds, are independent properties. It is therefore suggested that different mechanisms rule the cell deformations on time scales of several minutes, tens of seconds, and fractions of a second. 2. Cell spreading ability may effectively influence binding strength only when adhesive stimuli are low, since in this case, cell stiffness is likely to impair the formation of extensive contact areas. 3. Individual cells may display marked heterogeneity within a given population, that emphasizes the danger of using averaged parameters to predict rare events (such as metastasis formation). 4. The most useful parameters to discriminate between different cell lines were, spreading ability and shear-resistant lectin agglutination, and substrate adhesion. It is concluded that cell adhesion is influenced by several measurable cellular properties that may display independent variations. The importance of a given parameter depends on the conditions of bond formation and rupture.
通过寻找不同细胞群体的黏附行为与可测量生物学特性之间的相关性,对细胞黏附性的概念进行了分析。对10株已建立的黑色素瘤细胞系进行了以下检测:被动变形性(通过微量移液器抽吸法)、主动铺展能力(通过测量在不同表面孵育后的高度/直径比)、伴刀豆球蛋白A结合位点的密度和流动性(通过荧光显微镜图像的定量分析)、自发凝集和伴刀豆球蛋白A介导的凝集(通过测量抵抗校准剪切力的细胞结合物数量)以及与玻璃毛细管的结合(通过结合强度的定量测定)。由此测量了44个不同参数,并且每组测定在不同日期对每个细胞系重复进行2或3次。进行方差分析以评估每个参数区分不同细胞系的能力。研究了不同参数之间的相关性,以了解细胞内在特性对单个细胞行为的可能影响。实验数据得出以下结论:1. 细胞铺展能力、在微量移液器内抵抗缓慢变形的能力以及形成抗剪切键的能力是独立的特性。因此表明,在几分钟、几十秒和几分之一秒的时间尺度上,不同的机制控制着细胞变形。2. 仅当黏附刺激较低时,细胞铺展能力才可能有效影响结合强度,因为在这种情况下,细胞硬度可能会妨碍广泛接触区域的形成。3. 在给定群体中,单个细胞可能表现出明显的异质性,这强调了使用平均参数预测罕见事件(如转移形成)的危险性。4. 区分不同细胞系最有用的参数是铺展能力、抗剪切凝集素凝集和底物黏附。得出的结论是,细胞黏附受几种可测量的细胞特性影响,这些特性可能表现出独立的变化。给定参数的重要性取决于键形成和断裂的条件。