Bussolino F, Ziche M, Wang J M, Alessi D, Morbidelli L, Cremona O, Bosia A, Marchisio P C, Mantovani A
Dipartimento di Genetica, Biologia, e Chimica Medica, Università di Torino, Italy.
J Clin Invest. 1991 Mar;87(3):986-95. doi: 10.1172/JCI115107.
This study was designed to identify the set of functions activated in cultured endothelial cells by the hematopoietic growth factors, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte macrophage-colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and to compare them with those elicited by prototypic cytokines active on these cells. Moreover, indications as to the in vivo relevance of in vitro effects were obtained. G-CSF and GM-CSF induced endothelial cells to proliferate and migrate. In contrast, unlike appropriate reference cytokines (IL-1 and tumor necrosis factor, IFN-gamma), G-CSF and GM-CSF did not modulate endothelial cell functions related to hemostasis-thrombosis (production of procoagulant activity and of platelet activating factor), inflammation (expression of leukocyte adhesion molecule-1 and production of platelet activating factor), and accessory function (expression of class II antigens of MHC). Other colony-stimulating factors (IL-3 and macrophage-colony-stimulating factor) were inactive on all functions tested. In comparison to basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), G-CSF and GM-CSF induced lower maximal proliferation of endothelial cells, whereas migration was of the same order of magnitude. G-CSF and GM-CSF stimulated repair of mechanically wounded endothelial monolayers. Exposure to both cytokines induced shape changes and cytoskeletal reorganization consistent with a migratory phenotype. To explore the in vivo relevance of the in vitro effects of these cytokines on endothelium, we studied the angiogenic activity of human G-CSF in the rabbit cornea. G-CSF, but not the heat-inactivated molecule, had definite angiogenic activity, without any sign of inflammatory reactions. G-CSF was less active than bFGF. However, the combination of a nonangiogenic dose of bFGF with G-CSF resulted in an angiogenic response higher than that elicited by either individual cytokines. Thus, G-CSF and GM-CSF induce endothelial cells to express an activation/differentiation program (including proliferation and migration) related to angiogenesis.
本研究旨在确定造血生长因子粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)和粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(GM-CSF)在培养的内皮细胞中激活的功能集,并将其与作用于这些细胞的原型细胞因子所引发的功能进行比较。此外,还获得了有关体外效应体内相关性的指标。G-CSF和GM-CSF诱导内皮细胞增殖和迁移。相比之下,与合适的参考细胞因子(IL-1、肿瘤坏死因子、IFN-γ)不同,G-CSF和GM-CSF并未调节与止血-血栓形成(促凝血活性和血小板活化因子的产生)、炎症(白细胞粘附分子-1的表达和血小板活化因子的产生)及辅助功能(MHC II类抗原的表达)相关的内皮细胞功能。其他集落刺激因子(IL-3和巨噬细胞集落刺激因子)对所有测试功能均无活性。与碱性成纤维细胞生长因子(bFGF)相比,G-CSF和GM-CSF诱导内皮细胞的最大增殖较低,而迁移程度相当。G-CSF和GM-CSF刺激机械损伤的内皮单层的修复。暴露于这两种细胞因子会诱导与迁移表型一致的形态变化和细胞骨架重组。为了探究这些细胞因子对内皮细胞体外效应的体内相关性,我们研究了人G-CSF在兔角膜中的血管生成活性。G-CSF而非热灭活分子具有明确的血管生成活性,且无任何炎症反应迹象。G-CSF的活性低于bFGF。然而,非血管生成剂量的bFGF与G-CSF联合使用所产生的血管生成反应高于单独使用任何一种细胞因子所引发的反应。因此,G-CSF和GM-CSF诱导内皮细胞表达与血管生成相关的激活/分化程序(包括增殖和迁移)。