Sylvester Adam D, Christensen Angi M, Kramer Patricia A
Department of Anthropology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
J Anat. 2006 Nov;209(5):597-609. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2006.00640.x.
This study examines the osteological changes in the hands and fingers of rock climbers that result from intense, long-term mechanical stress placed on these bones. Specifically, it examines whether rock climbing leads to metacarpal and phalange modelling in the form of increased cortical thickness as well as joint changes associated with osteoarthritis. This study also attempts to identify specific climbing-related factors that may influence these changes, including climbing intensity and frequency of different styles of climbing. Radiographs of both hands were taken for each participant and were scored for radiographic signs of osteoarthritis using an atlas method. Total width and medullary width were measured directly on radiographs using digital calipers and used to calculate cross-sectional area and second moment of area based on a ring model. We compared 27 recreational rock climbers and 35 non-climbers for four measures of bone strength and dimensions (cross-sectional area, second moment of area, total width and medullary width) and osteoarthritis. A chi-squared test for independence was used to compare climber and non-climber osteoarthritis scores. For each measure of bone strength climbers and non-climbers were compared using a manova test. Significant manova tests were followed by principal components analysis (PCA) and individual anova tests performed on principal components with eigenvalues greater than one. A second PCA was performed on the climber subsample and the first principal component was then used as the dependent variable in linear regression variable selection procedures to determine which climbing-related variables affect bone thickness. The results suggest that climbers are not at an increased risk of developing osteoarthritis compared with non-climbers. Climbers, however, do have greater cross-sectional area as well as second moment of area. Greater total width, but not meduallary width, indicates that additional bone is deposited subperiosteally. The strength of the finger and hand bones are correlated with styles of climbing that emphasize athletic difficulty. Significant predictors include the highest levels achieved in bouldering and sport climbing.
本研究调查了攀岩者手部和手指因长期承受高强度机械应力而产生的骨学变化。具体而言,研究了攀岩是否会导致掌骨和指骨以皮质厚度增加的形式进行重塑,以及与骨关节炎相关的关节变化。本研究还试图确定可能影响这些变化的特定攀岩相关因素,包括攀岩强度和不同攀岩风格的频率。为每位参与者拍摄了双手的X光片,并使用图谱法对骨关节炎的X光征象进行评分。使用数字卡尺直接在X光片上测量总宽度和髓腔宽度,并基于环形模型用于计算横截面积和截面惯性矩。我们比较了27名休闲攀岩者和35名非攀岩者的四项骨强度和尺寸指标(横截面积、截面惯性矩、总宽度和髓腔宽度)以及骨关节炎情况。使用卡方独立性检验比较攀岩者和非攀岩者的骨关节炎评分。对于每项骨强度指标,使用多变量方差分析(MANOVA)检验比较攀岩者和非攀岩者。显著的多变量方差分析检验之后进行主成分分析(PCA),并对特征值大于1的主成分进行个体方差分析检验。对攀岩者子样本进行第二次主成分分析,然后将第一个主成分用作线性回归变量选择程序中的因变量,以确定哪些攀岩相关变量会影响骨厚度。结果表明,与非攀岩者相比,攀岩者患骨关节炎的风险并未增加。然而,攀岩者的横截面积和截面惯性矩确实更大。总宽度更大,但髓腔宽度没有变化,这表明骨膜下有额外的骨沉积。手指和手部骨骼的强度与强调运动难度的攀岩风格相关。显著的预测因素包括抱石和竞技攀登中达到的最高水平。