• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血液酒精浓度为0.08%时标准化现场清醒度测试组的验证。

Validation of the standardized field sobriety test battery at 0.08% blood alcohol concentration.

作者信息

Stuster Jack

机构信息

Anacapa Sciences, Inc., P.O. Box 519, Santa Barbara, CA 93101, USA.

出版信息

Hum Factors. 2006 Fall;48(3):608-14. doi: 10.1518/001872006778606895.

DOI:10.1518/001872006778606895
PMID:17063973
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

A field study was conducted to evaluate the accuracy of the Standardized Field Sobriety Test (SFST) battery to assist officers in making arrest decisions at blood alcohol concentrations (BACs) below 0.10%.

BACKGROUND

The SFST Battery was validated at 0.10% BAC in 1981, but since then many states have reduced statutory limits for driving while intoxicated to 0.08% BAC.

METHODS

During routine patrols, participating officers followed study procedures in administering SFSTs, scoring results, making arrest/no arrest decisions, and completing a data collection form for each of the 297 motorists evaluated during the study period. The officers' final step in each case was the administration of an evidentiary breath alcohol test.

RESULTS

Overall, officers' decisions were correct in more than 91% of the cases at the 0.08% BAC level. Cohen's kappa tests found all officers' scores to be within the categories of "substantial" and "near perfect" agreement, indicating low variance among the officers and a high degree of interrater reliability.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study provide evidence of the validity of the SFST Battery as an accurate and reliable decision aid for discriminating between BACs above and below 0.08%.

APPLICATION

The SFST Battery presently is used by law enforcement officers throughout the United States to help make roadside arrest decisions for impaired driving.

摘要

目的

开展一项现场研究,以评估标准化现场清醒度测试(SFST)组合测试在协助警官对血液酒精浓度(BAC)低于0.10%的情况做出逮捕决定时的准确性。

背景

SFST组合测试于1981年在BAC为0.10%时得到验证,但自那时起,许多州已将醉酒驾驶的法定限值降至BAC 0.08%。

方法

在常规巡逻期间,参与的警官遵循研究程序来实施SFST、对结果评分、做出逮捕/不逮捕决定,并为研究期间评估的297名驾车者中的每一位填写一份数据收集表。警官在每个案件中的最后一步是进行呼气酒精含量证据检测。

结果

总体而言,在BAC为0.08%的水平下,警官的决定在超过91%的案件中是正确的。科恩kappa检验发现所有警官的评分都在“高度一致”和“近乎完美一致”的类别内,表明警官之间的差异较小且评分者间信度较高。

结论

本研究结果为SFST组合测试作为区分BAC高于和低于0.08%的准确且可靠的决策辅助工具的有效性提供了证据。

应用

目前,美国各地的执法人员都使用SFST组合测试来协助做出路边对酒驾者的逮捕决定。

相似文献

1
Validation of the standardized field sobriety test battery at 0.08% blood alcohol concentration.血液酒精浓度为0.08%时标准化现场清醒度测试组的验证。
Hum Factors. 2006 Fall;48(3):608-14. doi: 10.1518/001872006778606895.
2
Statistical evaluation of standardized field sobriety tests.标准化现场清醒度测试的统计评估。
J Forensic Sci. 2005 May;50(3):662-9.
3
Police officers' detection of breath odors from alcohol ingestion.
Accid Anal Prev. 1999 May;31(3):175-80. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(98)00060-8.
4
Judging intoxication.判断醉酒状态。
Behav Sci Law. 2011 Jan-Feb;29(1):116-37. doi: 10.1002/bsl.935. Epub 2010 May 21.
5
The Standardized Field Sobriety Tests (SFST) and measures of cognitive functioning.标准化现场清醒度测试(SFST)与认知功能测量
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Jan;86:90-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.10.019. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
6
Validity of the passive alcohol sensor for estimating BACs in DWI-enforcement operations.
J Stud Alcohol. 2006 Sep;67(5):714-21. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2006.67.714.
7
Evaluation of the use and benefit of passive alcohol sensors during routine traffic stops.在常规交通拦截期间对被动酒精传感器的使用及益处的评估。
Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2007;51:437-48.
8
Field sobriety tests: are they designed for failure?现场清醒度测试:它们是为失败而设计的吗?
Percept Mot Skills. 1994 Aug;79(1 Pt 1):99-104. doi: 10.2466/pms.1994.79.1.99.
9
Sleep deprivation does not mimic alcohol intoxication on field sobriety testing.睡眠剥夺在现场清醒度测试中不会模拟酒精中毒。
J Forensic Sci. 2011 Sep;56(5):1170-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01813.x. Epub 2011 May 19.
10
Developing a standardized measurement of alcohol intoxication.开发一种酒精中毒的标准化测量方法。
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 May;35(5):725-730. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.01.009. Epub 2017 Jan 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Police Decision-Making in the Absence of Evidence-Based Guidelines: Assessment of Alcohol-Intoxicated Eyewitnesses.缺乏循证指南情况下的警方决策:对酒精中毒目击者的评估
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 3;13:761956. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.761956. eCollection 2022.
2
Medical Cannabis for Headache Pain: a Primer for Clinicians.医用大麻治疗头痛:临床医生指南。
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2021 Oct 9;25(10):64. doi: 10.1007/s11916-021-00974-z.
3
Assessment of cognitive and psychomotor impairment, subjective effects, and blood THC concentrations following acute administration of oral and vaporized cannabis.
评估口服和蒸气吸入大麻后急性给药对认知和运动障碍、主观效应和血液 THC 浓度的影响。
J Psychopharmacol. 2021 Jul;35(7):786-803. doi: 10.1177/02698811211021583. Epub 2021 May 28.
4
Are the Preliminary Impairment Tests used by UK police fit for purpose?英国警方使用的初步损伤测试是否适用?
Med Sci Law. 2021 Jan;61(1):4-5. doi: 10.1177/0025802420966402. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
5
A Judicial Perspective on Expert Testimony in Marijuana Driving Cases.大麻驾驶案件中专家证人证言的司法视角
J Med Toxicol. 2017 Mar;13(1):117-123. doi: 10.1007/s13181-016-0579-z. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
6
Detecting impairment associated with cannabis with and without alcohol on the Standardized Field Sobriety Tests.检测使用和不使用酒精的大麻相关损害与标准化现场清醒测试。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012 Dec;224(4):581-9. doi: 10.1007/s00213-012-2787-9. Epub 2012 Jul 5.
7
A placebo-controlled study to assess Standardized Field Sobriety Tests performance during alcohol and cannabis intoxication in heavy cannabis users and accuracy of point of collection testing devices for detecting THC in oral fluid.一项安慰剂对照研究评估了重度大麻使用者在酒精和大麻中毒期间标准化现场清醒测试的表现,以及用于检测口腔液中 THC 的采集点测试设备的准确性。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012 Oct;223(4):439-46. doi: 10.1007/s00213-012-2732-y. Epub 2012 May 13.