Aubrun F, Amour J, Rosenthal D, Coriat P, Riou B
Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Centre hospitalo-universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris 6 Paris, France.
Br J Anaesth. 2007 Jan;98(1):124-30. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael284. Epub 2006 Oct 25.
I.V. morphine titration (MT) allows adjustment of the dose needed for pain relief in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU). However, MT has limitations such as a delay to achieve pain relief. We thus assessed the effect of a fixed intraoperative loading dose of morphine administered before titration.
One hundred patients who were undergoing major orthopaedic surgery were included in a double-blind, randomized study comparing a loading dose of morphine (0.15 mg kg(-1)) with placebo administered intraoperatively. MT was then administered in the PACU followed by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) over 24 h. Data are expressed as mean (sd).
The initial VAS [41 (36) vs 52 (35), NS] was not decreased in the morphine group. The VAS was lower in the morphine group in the PACU and PCA periods. The time to achieve effective pain relief was not decreased in the morphine group. The total dose of morphine administered in the PACU (including the loading dose) was significantly increased in the morphine group (+31% in mg kg(-1), P<0.05). Morphine requirements during the PCA period were not different between groups. The incidence of sedation was increased and a severe episode of ventilatory depression occurred in the morphine group.
A loading dose of morphine administered at the end of surgery slightly decreased the VAS but did not reduce the time to pain relief or morphine consumption within the first 24 h. This slight improvement in analgesia was obtained at the expense of morphine-related adverse events.
静脉注射吗啡滴定法(MT)可在麻醉后护理单元(PACU)调整缓解疼痛所需的剂量。然而,MT存在局限性,如实现疼痛缓解存在延迟。因此,我们评估了滴定前给予固定术中负荷剂量吗啡的效果。
100例行大骨科手术的患者纳入一项双盲随机研究,比较术中给予吗啡负荷剂量(0.15 mg/kg)与安慰剂的效果。然后在PACU给予MT,随后进行24小时的患者自控镇痛(PCA)。数据以均数(标准差)表示。
吗啡组初始视觉模拟评分(VAS)未降低[41(36)对52(35),无显著性差异]。在PACU和PCA期间,吗啡组的VAS较低。吗啡组实现有效疼痛缓解的时间未缩短。PACU中给予的吗啡总剂量(包括负荷剂量)在吗啡组显著增加(mg/kg增加31%,P<0.05)。PCA期间两组间吗啡需求量无差异。吗啡组镇静发生率增加,且发生了1例严重的通气抑制事件。
手术结束时给予吗啡负荷剂量可使VAS略有降低,但并未缩短疼痛缓解时间或减少前24小时内的吗啡消耗量。这种镇痛效果的轻微改善是以吗啡相关不良事件为代价的。