Suppr超能文献

单独及联合使用奥司他韦和利巴韦林对近期甲型(H1N1)和乙型流感病毒分离株感染小鼠的活性。

Activities of oseltamivir and ribavirin used alone and in combination against infections in mice with recent isolates of influenza A (H1N1) and B viruses.

作者信息

Smee Donald F, Wong Min-Hui, Bailey Kevin W, Sidwell Robert W

机构信息

Institute for Antiviral Research, Department of Animal, Dairy and Veterinary Sciences, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84321-5600, USA.

出版信息

Antivir Chem Chemother. 2006;17(4):185-92. doi: 10.1177/095632020601700403.

Abstract

Mouse models have been widely used for evaluating potential influenza virus inhibitors. However, the viral strains traditionally used in these models are fairly old and do not represent currently circulating viruses in nature. We developed two new lethal infection models in mice using mouse-adapted influenza A/New Caledonia/20/99 (H1N1) and influenza B/Sichuan/379/99 viruses. Both virus infections were used to study oral treatment with oseltamivir and ribavirin, both alone and in combination. Oral treatments were given twice daily for 5 days starting 4 h before infection in initial studies. Against influenza A, oseltamivir was active at 10, 20, and 40 mg/kg/day, protected 80-100% of mice from death and reduced lung consolidation - ribavirin was similarly effective at 20, 40, and 80 mg/kg/day. When treatments were initiated after virus challenge, delaying treatment with oseltamivir even 1 day caused it to be ineffective. Ribavirin prevented mortality by 50-80% when treatments were delayed 1-4 days after infection. The combination of the two drugs (oseltamivir at 20 mg/kg/day and ribavirin at 40 mg/kg/day) was no better than ribavirin alone. In contrast to what we observed with influenza A virus infections, oseltamivir and ribavirin showed similar dose-related antiviral activities against influenza B virus infections. The compounds both significantly increased survival when treatments started up to 4 days after infection, but ribavirin was more active than oseltamivir (50-80% survival compared to 30-40% survival, respectively, when starting treatments on days 2-4 after infection). By varying the doses of each drug that were used in combination (oseltamivir at 1.25, 2.5 and 5 mg/kg/day; ribavirin at 5, 10 and 20 mg/kg/day) certain dosage combinations were superior to either compound used alone as assessed by decreased mortality, lung virus titre, lung score and lung weight parameters. These activities differed from published results with older, more established virus strains as oseltamivir was less effective and ribavirin was more active than previously reported.

摘要

小鼠模型已被广泛用于评估潜在的流感病毒抑制剂。然而,这些模型中传统使用的病毒株相当陈旧,并不代表目前自然界中传播的病毒。我们使用适应小鼠的甲型流感病毒/新喀里多尼亚/20/99(H1N1)和乙型流感病毒/四川/379/99病毒在小鼠中开发了两种新的致死性感染模型。两种病毒感染均用于研究单独及联合使用奥司他韦和利巴韦林的口服治疗效果。在初始研究中,从感染前4小时开始,每天口服给药两次,持续5天。针对甲型流感,奥司他韦在10、20和40mg/kg/天的剂量下具有活性,可保护80 - 100%的小鼠免于死亡,并减少肺部实变——利巴韦林在20、40和80mg/kg/天的剂量下同样有效。当在病毒攻击后开始治疗时,即使奥司他韦延迟1天给药也会使其无效。当在感染后1 - 4天延迟治疗时,利巴韦林可使死亡率降低50 - 80%。两种药物联合使用(奥司他韦20mg/kg/天和利巴韦林40mg/kg/天)并不比单独使用利巴韦林效果更好。与我们在甲型流感病毒感染中观察到的情况相反,奥司他韦和利巴韦林在乙型流感病毒感染中显示出相似的剂量相关抗病毒活性。当在感染后长达4天开始治疗时,两种化合物均显著提高了生存率,但利巴韦林比奥司他韦更具活性(在感染后第2 - 4天开始治疗时,生存率分别为50 - 80%和30 - 40%)。通过改变联合使用的每种药物的剂量(奥司他韦1.25、2.5和5mg/kg/天;利巴韦林5、10和20mg/kg/天),根据死亡率降低、肺病毒滴度、肺评分和肺重量参数评估,某些剂量组合优于单独使用的任何一种化合物。这些活性与使用更陈旧、更成熟病毒株的已发表结果不同,因为奥司他韦的效果较差,而利巴韦林比先前报道的更具活性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验