Sandrasegaran Kumaresan, Rydberg Jonas, Akisik Fatih, Hameed Tariq A, Dunkle Jeffrey W
Department of Radiology, UH 0279, 550 N. University Boulevard, Indiana University School of Medicine, IN 46202, USA.
Acad Radiol. 2006 Nov;13(11):1338-43. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2006.04.019.
To evaluate the image quality of axial and coronal reformats obtained from isotropic resolution abdomino-pelvic computed tomography (CT) examinations.
Thirty consecutive patients with intravenous contrast-enhanced abdomino-pelvic CT examinations (Brilliance 40, Philips Medical Systems, Cleveland, OH) were enrolled for the study. The raw data were reconstructed into two sets of source axial images: 0.9-mm slice widths with 0.45-mm reconstruction interval (isotropic resolution) and 4-mm slice widths with 3-mm reconstruction interval (anisotropic resolution: group A). Isotropic data set was reformatted into axial and coronal stacks (groups B and C, respectively) with 4-mm slice width and 3-mm interval. Three independent readers evaluated stacks A to C using a 3-point scale for resolution of hepatic vessels, edge sharpness of kidneys, respiratory motion artifact, reconstruction artifact, noise, and overall image quality.
There was no statistical difference among the groups A to C for vessel resolution, motion artifact, noise, and overall quality. The scores given to group C were significantly lower than those to groups A and B for reconstruction artifacts. There was no difference among groups A to C for overall impression of image quality. The interreader agreements were excellent for axial images (groups A and B) and moderate for coronal reformats.
Isotropic scanning of the abdomen and pelvis allows creation of reformats with similar image quality as similar thickness axial source images. These reformats are of sufficient quality to form the basis of clinical interpretation.
评估从各向同性分辨率的腹部盆腔计算机断层扫描(CT)检查中获得的轴向和冠状面重组图像的质量。
连续纳入30例接受静脉注射对比剂增强的腹部盆腔CT检查(Brilliance 40,飞利浦医疗系统公司,俄亥俄州克利夫兰)的患者进行研究。原始数据被重建为两组源轴向图像:层厚0.9mm、重建间隔0.45mm(各向同性分辨率)以及层厚4mm、重建间隔3mm(各向异性分辨率:A组)。各向同性数据集被重组成层厚4mm、间隔3mm的轴向和冠状面图像堆栈(分别为B组和C组)。三名独立阅片者使用3分制对A至C组图像堆栈在肝血管分辨率、肾脏边缘锐利度、呼吸运动伪影、重建伪影、噪声及整体图像质量方面进行评估。
A至C组在血管分辨率、运动伪影、噪声及整体质量方面无统计学差异。C组在重建伪影方面的得分显著低于A组和B组。A至C组在图像质量的总体印象方面无差异。阅片者之间对于轴向图像(A组和B组)的一致性极佳,对于冠状面重组图像的一致性中等。
腹部和盆腔的各向同性扫描能够生成与类似厚度的轴向源图像具有相似图像质量的重组图像。这些重组图像质量足以作为临床解读的基础。