Reichmann D, Cohen M, Abramovich R, Dym O, Lim D, Strynadka N C J, Schreiber G
Department of Biological Chemistry, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel.
J Mol Biol. 2007 Jan 19;365(3):663-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.09.076. Epub 2006 Oct 3.
Proteins bind one another in aqua's solution to form tight and specific complexes. Previously we have shown that this is achieved through the modular architecture of the interaction network formed by the interface residues, where tight cooperative interactions are found within modules but not between them. Here we extend this study to cover the entire interface of TEM1 beta-lactamase and its protein inhibitor BLIP using an improved method for deriving interaction maps based on REDUCE to add hydrogen atoms and then by evaluating the interactions using modifications of the programs PROBE, NCI and PARE. An extensive mutagenesis study of the interface residues indeed showed that each module is energetically independent on other modules, and that cooperativity is found only within a module. By solving the X-ray structure of two interface mutations affecting two different modules, we demonstrated that protein-protein binding occur via the structural reorganization of the binding modules, either by a "lock and key" or an induced fit mechanism. To explain the cooperativity within a module, we performed multiple-mutant cycle analysis of cluster 2 resulting in a high-resolution energy map of this module. Mutant studies are usually done in reference to alanine, which can be regarded as a deletion of a side-chain. However, from a biological perspective, there is a major interest to understand non-Ala substitutions, as they are most common. Using X-ray crystallography and multiple-mutant cycle analysis we demonstrated the added complexity in understanding non-Ala mutations. Here, a double mutation replacing the wild-type Glu,Tyr to Tyr,Asn on TEM1 (res id 104,105) caused a major backbone structural rearrangement of BLIP, changing the composition of two modules but not of other modules within the interface. This shows the robustness of the modular approach, yet demonstrates the complexity of in silico protein design.
蛋白质在水溶液中相互结合形成紧密且特异的复合物。此前我们已经表明,这是通过由界面残基形成的相互作用网络的模块化结构实现的,其中在模块内部存在紧密的协同相互作用,但模块之间不存在。在这里,我们扩展了这项研究,使用一种改进的方法来推导相互作用图谱,该方法基于REDUCE添加氢原子,然后通过修改PROBE、NCI和PARE程序来评估相互作用,从而涵盖TEM1β-内酰胺酶及其蛋白质抑制剂BLIP的整个界面。对界面残基的广泛诱变研究确实表明,每个模块在能量上独立于其他模块,并且协同作用仅在一个模块内发现。通过解析影响两个不同模块的两个界面突变的X射线结构,我们证明了蛋白质-蛋白质结合是通过结合模块的结构重组发生的,要么通过“锁钥”机制,要么通过诱导契合机制。为了解释一个模块内的协同作用,我们对簇2进行了多突变循环分析,得到了该模块的高分辨率能量图谱。突变研究通常以丙氨酸为参照进行,丙氨酸可被视为侧链的缺失。然而,从生物学角度来看,理解非丙氨酸取代非常重要,因为它们最为常见。使用X射线晶体学和多突变循环分析,我们证明了理解非丙氨酸突变的复杂性增加。在这里,TEM1(残基104、105)上的一个双突变将野生型的Glu、Tyr替换为Tyr、Asn,导致BLIP的主链结构发生重大重排,改变了两个模块的组成,但未改变界面内其他模块的组成。这显示了模块化方法的稳健性,但也证明了计算机辅助蛋白质设计的复杂性。