Eum Ki-Do, Li Jian, Jhun Hyung-Joon, Park Jong-Tae, Tak Sang-Woo, Karasek Robert, Cho Sung-Il
Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2007 May;80(6):497-504. doi: 10.1007/s00420-006-0156-x. Epub 2006 Oct 28.
To test the validity and reliability of selected scales, namely, decision latitude, psychological job demand, social support, job insecurity, and macro-level decision latitude from the Korean version of the job content questionnaire (K-JCQ), as part of a psychosocial epidemiological study among university hospital workers.
K-JCQ was developed by translation and back translation complying with the JCQ usage policy, and its psychometric properties were explored among 338 workers (290 females and 48 males) in a university hospital in Korea. Internal consistency was examined using Cronbach's alpha correlation coefficients. Factorial validity was tested using exploratory factor analysis. Pearson's correlation coefficients were used for test-retest reliability among a subset of 157 workers who responded to a repeat survey. Criterion-related validity was assessed by investigating the effects of the scales on job satisfaction and self-identity through work in multiple regression models.
Cronbach's alpha for all selected scales was higher than 0.6, except for job insecurity (0.53) and macro-level decision authority (0.52), indicating appropriate internal consistency. Correlation coefficients between test and retest scales of decision latitude, psychological job demand, and social support were 0.60, 0.41, and 0.35, respectively. Exploratory factor analysis found three- and four-factor models, i.e., with and without macro-level decision latitude, respectively, closely corresponding to the theoretical constructs. High levels of decision latitude and social support, and low levels of psychological job demand and job insecurity were significantly associated with high level of job satisfaction. Higher self-identity through work was positively related to decision latitude and social support.
These findings suggest that K-JCQ is valid and reliable for assessing psychosocial job stress among Korean workers. Macro-level decision latitude showed a separate factorial structure and was strongly associated with task-level decision latitude.
作为一项针对大学医院工作人员的社会心理流行病学研究的一部分,检验韩国版工作内容问卷(K-JCQ)中选定量表的有效性和可靠性,这些量表包括决策自由度、心理工作需求、社会支持、工作不安全感和宏观层面决策自由度。
K-JCQ是根据JCQ使用政策通过翻译和回译编制而成,并在韩国一家大学医院的338名工作人员(290名女性和48名男性)中探索其心理测量特性。使用克朗巴哈α相关系数检验内部一致性。使用探索性因素分析检验因子效度。在157名回复重复调查的工作人员子集中,使用皮尔逊相关系数检验重测信度。通过在多元回归模型中研究量表对工作满意度和工作自我认同的影响来评估效标关联效度。
除工作不安全感(0.53)和宏观层面决策权(0.52)外,所有选定量表的克朗巴哈α均高于0.6,表明内部一致性良好。决策自由度、心理工作需求和社会支持的重测量表之间的相关系数分别为0.60、0.41和0.35。探索性因素分析发现了三因素模型和四因素模型,即分别包含和不包含宏观层面决策自由度,这与理论结构密切对应。高水平的决策自由度和社会支持,以及低水平的心理工作需求和工作不安全感与高水平的工作满意度显著相关。通过工作获得更高的自我认同与决策自由度和社会支持呈正相关。
这些发现表明,K-JCQ在评估韩国工作人员的社会心理工作压力方面是有效且可靠的。宏观层面决策自由度显示出独立的因子结构,并与任务层面决策自由度密切相关。