• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳腺癌/卵巢癌遗传咨询中的沟通

Communication in genetic counselling for breast/ovarian cancer.

作者信息

Dolbeault S, Flahault C, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Brédart A

机构信息

Psycho-Oncology Unit, Institut Curie, Paris, France.

出版信息

Recent Results Cancer Res. 2006;168:23-36. doi: 10.1007/3-540-30758-3_3.

DOI:10.1007/3-540-30758-3_3
PMID:17073189
Abstract

Cancer genetic counselling represents a very special situation of interaction between the geneticist and the counselee, marked by a number of specificities that account for its complexity. Cancer genetic counselling has multiple repercussions, such as identification of a deleterious genetic mutation associated with a high probability of developing breast and/or ovarian cancer, the implementation of preventive measures ranging from close surveillance to the decision to perform mutilating prophylactic surgical procedures, or the impact of the information on the other members of the counselee's family also concerned by the genetic risk. This chapter is based on a review of the literature that has been rapidly growing over recent years and on our clinical expertise as psycho-oncologists and geneticists. We will first present the reasons that make the information so critical. These reasons are both objective (complexity of the genetic information per se, difficulties of understanding the concept of risk) and subjective (information given to people with an emotionally charged family history and a perception of risks closely linked to their representation of cancer). At the same time, the counsellees are charged with the transmission of this information to members of their own family. We will then discuss the various modalities of communication in this setting. While unidirectional transfer of information from the geneticist to the counselee has been the preferred method in cancer genetics for a long time, a model based on patient-centered communication is more adequate in predictive medicine and allows shared decision making. In all cases, the different professionals involved in the process have to learn how to work in a performing cohesion. We also present the main guidelines on the subject and the various underlying objectives with regard to information delivery and the subject's personal experience. Although the psychological impact of genetic counselling consultations raises a number of questions, the results of preliminary studies are reassuring, demonstrating psychological benefits. However, a number of aspects concerning communication in predictive medicine remain to be investigated and improved.

摘要

癌症遗传咨询代表了遗传学家与咨询对象之间一种非常特殊的互动情况,其具有许多特殊性,这也说明了它的复杂性。癌症遗传咨询有多种影响,比如识别出与患乳腺癌和/或卵巢癌高概率相关的有害基因突变、实施从密切监测到决定进行致残性预防性手术等一系列预防措施,或者该信息对咨询对象家族中同样受遗传风险影响的其他成员所产生的影响。本章基于对近年来快速增长的文献的综述以及我们作为心理肿瘤学家和遗传学家的临床专业知识。我们将首先阐述使信息如此关键的原因。这些原因既有客观的(遗传信息本身的复杂性、理解风险概念的困难),也有主观的(向有情感负担的家族病史人群提供信息以及他们对风险的认知与他们对癌症的认知紧密相关)。与此同时,咨询对象还肩负着将此信息传递给其家族成员的责任。然后我们将讨论在这种情况下的各种沟通方式。虽然长期以来,从遗传学家到咨询对象的单向信息传递一直是癌症遗传学中首选的方法,但在预测医学中,基于以患者为中心的沟通模式更为合适,并且能够实现共同决策。在所有情况下,参与这一过程的不同专业人员都必须学会如何在高效协作中开展工作。我们还介绍了关于这个主题的主要指导方针以及在信息传递和对象个人体验方面的各种潜在目标。尽管遗传咨询会诊的心理影响引发了一些问题,但初步研究结果令人安心,显示出了心理益处。然而,预测医学中有关沟通的许多方面仍有待研究和改进。

相似文献

1
Communication in genetic counselling for breast/ovarian cancer.乳腺癌/卵巢癌遗传咨询中的沟通
Recent Results Cancer Res. 2006;168:23-36. doi: 10.1007/3-540-30758-3_3.
2
Psychosocial aspects of risk communication and mutation testing in familial breast-ovarian cancer.家族性乳腺癌-卵巢癌风险沟通与突变检测的社会心理层面
Curr Opin Oncol. 2005 Jul;17(4):340-4. doi: 10.1097/01.cco.0000166653.15546.06.
3
Counselee participation in follow-up breast cancer genetic counselling visits and associations with achievement of the preferred role, cognitive outcomes, risk perception alignment and perceived personal control.咨询对象参与乳腺癌遗传咨询随访就诊情况及其与实现偏好角色、认知结果、风险认知一致性和感知个人控制感的关联。
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Sep;116:178-86. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.07.012. Epub 2014 Jul 6.
4
Predictive testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: a psychological framework for pre-test counselling.遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌的预测性检测:检测前咨询的心理框架
Eur J Hum Genet. 2000 Feb;8(2):130-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200438.
5
Improved health perception after genetic counselling for women at high risk of breast and/or ovarian cancer: construction of new questionnaires--an Italian exploratory study.乳腺癌和/或卵巢癌高危女性接受遗传咨询后健康认知的改善:新问卷的构建——一项意大利探索性研究
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016 Mar;142(3):633-48. doi: 10.1007/s00432-015-2062-7. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
6
Risk Perception and Psychological Distress in Genetic Counselling for Hereditary Breast and/or Ovarian Cancer.遗传性乳腺癌和/或卵巢癌遗传咨询中的风险认知与心理困扰
J Genet Couns. 2017 Oct;26(5):999-1007. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0072-0. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
7
Opening the psychological black box in genetic counseling. The psychological impact of DNA testing is predicted by the counselees' perception, the medical impact by the pathogenic or uninformative BRCA1/2-result.打开基因咨询中的心理黑箱。DNA 检测的心理影响由被咨询者的感知预测,而医学影响则由致病性或无信息的 BRCA1/2 结果预测。
Psychooncology. 2012 Jan;21(1):29-42. doi: 10.1002/pon.1864. Epub 2010 Nov 11.
8
Communication about genetic testing with breast and ovarian cancer patients: a scoping review.与乳腺癌和卵巢癌患者沟通基因检测:范围综述。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2019 Apr;27(4):511-524. doi: 10.1038/s41431-018-0310-4. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
9
Design of the BRISC study: a multicentre controlled clinical trial to optimize the communication of breast cancer risks in genetic counselling.BRISC研究的设计:一项多中心对照临床试验,旨在优化遗传咨询中乳腺癌风险的沟通。
BMC Cancer. 2008 Oct 3;8:283. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-8-283.
10
Perceiving cancer-risks and heredity-likelihood in genetic-counseling: how counselees recall and interpret BRCA 1/2-test results.在遗传咨询中感知癌症风险和遗传可能性:被咨询者如何回忆和解释 BRCA1/2 测试结果。
Clin Genet. 2011 Mar;79(3):207-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2010.01581.x. Epub 2010 Nov 28.