• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一个关于确定和回应卫生管理人员的研究重点以辅助卫生服务决策的案例研究。

A case study on determining and responding to health managers' priorities for research to assist health service decision making.

作者信息

Aldrich Rosemary, Bonevski Billie, Wilson Amanda

机构信息

Newcastle Institute of Public Health, Clinical Governance Unit, Hunter New England Area Health Service, New Lambton, Newcastle, NSW 2305, Australia.

出版信息

Aust Health Rev. 2006 Nov;30(4):435-41. doi: 10.1071/ah060435.

DOI:10.1071/ah060435
PMID:17073537
Abstract

The Newcastle Institute of Public Health (NIPH) is a collaboration of health service and public health research groups in the Hunter Region of New South Wales, Australia which aims to promote the use of evidence in decision making. However, use of research evidence in decision making is a complex process, with many barriers and enablers described in the literature. Informed by strategies described in the literature around developing priority-driven research, NIPH researchers undertook to determine whether asking local health decision-makers about their needs for research information might lead to greater use of the resulting research evidence to inform health service management decisions. This paper describes a process used by NIPH to determine the research needs of 11 local senior health managers, our response to specific research questions, the communication of this research information, and the outcome.

摘要

纽卡斯尔公共卫生研究所(NIPH)是澳大利亚新南威尔士州亨特地区卫生服务和公共卫生研究团体的合作机构,旨在促进决策过程中证据的使用。然而,在决策中使用研究证据是一个复杂的过程,文献中描述了许多障碍和推动因素。基于围绕开展优先驱动型研究的文献中所述的策略,NIPH的研究人员着手确定询问当地卫生决策者对研究信息的需求是否可能导致更多地使用由此产生的研究证据来为卫生服务管理决策提供信息。本文描述了NIPH用于确定11位当地高级卫生管理人员研究需求的过程、我们对特定研究问题的回应、该研究信息的传播以及结果。

相似文献

1
A case study on determining and responding to health managers' priorities for research to assist health service decision making.一个关于确定和回应卫生管理人员的研究重点以辅助卫生服务决策的案例研究。
Aust Health Rev. 2006 Nov;30(4):435-41. doi: 10.1071/ah060435.
2
Decision makers' perceptions of health technology decision making and priority setting at the institutional level.决策者对机构层面卫生技术决策和优先级设定的认知。
Aust Health Rev. 2008 Aug;32(3):520-7. doi: 10.1071/ah080520.
3
Exploring how different modes of governance act across health system levels to influence primary healthcare facility managers' use of information in decision-making: experience from Cape Town, South Africa.探究不同治理模式在卫生系统各层面的作用如何影响初级卫生保健机构管理者在决策中的信息使用:来自南非开普敦的经验。
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Sep 15;16(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0660-5.
4
A framework to improve evidence-informed decision-making in health service management.一个改善卫生服务管理中循证决策的框架。
Aust Health Rev. 2012 Aug;36(3):284-9. doi: 10.1071/AH11051.
5
Healthcare managers' decision making: findings of a small scale exploratory study.医疗保健管理者的决策:一项小规模探索性研究的结果
Health Informatics J. 2008 Dec;14(4):247-58. doi: 10.1177/1460458208096554.
6
Evidence-based management reconsidered.循证管理再思考。
Front Health Serv Manage. 2006 Spring;22(3):3-22.
7
8
Involving the general public in priority setting: experiences from Australia.让公众参与确定优先事项:来自澳大利亚的经验。
Soc Sci Med. 2003 Mar;56(5):1001-12. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00091-6.
9
The informed decisions toolbox: tools for knowledge transfer and performance improvement.知情决策工具箱:知识转移与绩效改进工具
J Healthc Manag. 2007 Sep-Oct;52(5):325-41; discussion 341-2.
10
Adaptive decision-making: how Australian healthcare managers decide.适应性决策:澳大利亚医疗保健管理者如何做出决策。
Aust Health Rev. 2012 Feb;36(1):49-56. doi: 10.1071/AH10971.