Hedayat K M, Shooshtarizadeh P, Raza M
Sutton Children's Hospital at Christus-Schumpert Hospital, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA.
J Med Ethics. 2006 Nov;32(11):652-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.015289.
Abortion is forbidden under normal circumstances by nearly all the major world religions. Traditionally, abortion was not deemed permissible by Muslim scholars. Shiite scholars considered it forbidden after implantation of the fertilised ovum. However, Sunni scholars have held various opinions on the matter, but all agreed that after 4 months gestation abortion was not permitted. In addition, classical Islamic scholarship had only considered threats to maternal health as a reason for therapeutic abortion. Recently, scholars have begun to consider the effect of severe fetal deformities on the mother, the families and society. This has led some scholars to reconsider the prohibition on abortion in limited circumstances. This article reviews the Islamic basis for the prohibition of abortion and the reasons for its justification. Contemporary rulings from leading Shiite scholars and from the Sunni school of thought are presented and reviewed. The status of abortion in Muslim countries is reviewed, with special emphasis on the therapeutic abortion law passed by the Iranian Parliament in 2003. This law approved therapeutic abortion before 16 weeks of gestation under limited circumstances, including medical conditions related to fetal and maternal health. Recent measures in Iran provide an opportunity for the Muslim scholars in other countries to review their traditional stance on abortion.
在正常情况下,世界上几乎所有主要宗教都禁止堕胎。传统上,穆斯林学者认为堕胎是不被允许的。什叶派学者认为,在受精卵着床后堕胎是被禁止的。然而,逊尼派学者对此事持有不同观点,但都一致认为怀孕4个月后不允许堕胎。此外,传统的伊斯兰学术仅将对孕产妇健康的威胁视为治疗性堕胎的理由。最近,学者们开始考虑严重胎儿畸形对母亲、家庭和社会的影响。这使得一些学者重新考虑在有限情况下对堕胎的禁令。本文回顾了禁止堕胎的伊斯兰依据及其正当理由。文中呈现并审视了什叶派主要学者和逊尼派的当代裁决。本文还审视了穆斯林国家的堕胎状况,特别强调了伊朗议会于2003年通过的治疗性堕胎法。该法律批准在有限情况下,即在怀孕16周前,包括与胎儿和孕产妇健康相关的医疗状况下进行治疗性堕胎。伊朗最近的举措为其他国家的穆斯林学者提供了一个机会,来审视他们在堕胎问题上的传统立场。