Suppr超能文献

创伤周围解离对事故幸存者创伤后应激障碍症状的预测能力较低。

Low predictive power of peritraumatic dissociation for PTSD symptoms in accident survivors.

作者信息

Wittmann Lutz, Moergeli Hanspeter, Schnyder Ulrich

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Trauma Stress. 2006 Oct;19(5):639-51. doi: 10.1002/jts.20154.

Abstract

To test the predictive power of peritraumatic dissociation for the development of psychopathology, the authors assessed symptoms of peritraumatic dissociation (Peritraumatic Dissociative Experiences Questionnaire; PDEQ), posttraumatic stress disorder (Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale; CAPS), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; HADS) in a sample of 214 accident victims 5 days postaccident (T1). Six months later (T2), CAPS and HADS were administered again. Acute stress disorder (ASD) and PTSD symptom levels were surprisingly low. In sequential regression analyses, initial reexperiencing and hyperarousal significantly predicted PTSD symptom level (T2) over several possibly confounding variables controlled for. Peritraumatic dissociation explained less than 3% of variance. For PTSD scores, 38% overall variance explanation was obtained; the variance for HADS scores was low. Possible explanations for the low-predictive power of peritraumatic dissociation for posttraumatic psychopathology in the sample are discussed.

摘要

为了测试创伤时解离对精神病理学发展的预测能力,作者对214名事故受害者在事故发生5天后(T1)的创伤时解离症状(创伤时解离体验问卷;PDEQ)、创伤后应激障碍(临床医生管理的PTSD量表;CAPS)、焦虑和抑郁(医院焦虑和抑郁量表;HADS)进行了评估。六个月后(T2),再次进行CAPS和HADS评估。急性应激障碍(ASD)和PTSD症状水平出奇地低。在序列回归分析中,在控制了几个可能的混杂变量后,最初的重新体验和过度觉醒显著预测了PTSD症状水平(T2)。创伤时解离解释的方差不到3%。对于PTSD评分,总体方差解释率为38%;HADS评分的方差较低。文中讨论了该样本中创伤时解离对创伤后精神病理学预测能力较低的可能原因。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验