Foster Diana Greene, Parvataneni Ram, de Bocanegra Heike Thiel, Lewis Carrie, Bradsberry Mary, Darney Philip
Bixby Center for Reproductive Health Research and Policy, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Nov;108(5):1107-14. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000239122.98508.39.
To estimate the effect of the number of cycles of oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) dispensed per visit on method continuation, pill wastage, use of services, and health care costs.
We used paid claims data for 82,319 women dispensed OCPs through the California Family PACT (Planning, Access, Care, and Treatment) Program in January 2003 to examine contraceptive continuation and service use.
Women who received 13 cycles at their first visit in January 2003 received 14.5 cycles over the course of 2003 compared with 9.0 cycles among women receiving three cycles at first visit. When client characteristics are controlled, women who received 13 cycles were 28% more likely to have OCPs on hand and twice as likely to have sufficient OCP cycles for 15 months of continuous use compared with women who received three cycles. Oral contraceptive pill wastage was higher among women initially dispensed 13 cycles (6.5% of the cycles dispensed) than among women who received three cycles (2% of cycles). Despite having one fewer clinician visit, women dispensed 13 cycles were more likely to receive Pap and Chlamydia tests and less likely to have a pregnancy test than women initially dispensed fewer cycles. Over the course of the year, Family PACT paid 99 US dollars more for women who received three cycles and 44 US dollars more for women who received only one cycle than it did for women who received 13 cycles at their first visits of 2003.
Dispensing a year's supply of OCP cycles to women is associated with higher method continuation and lower costs than dispensing fewer cycles per visit.
II-2.
评估每次就诊时发放口服避孕药(OCP)的周期数对方法持续使用、药丸浪费、服务利用和医疗保健成本的影响。
我们使用了2003年1月通过加利福尼亚家庭PACT(规划、获取、护理和治疗)计划为82319名发放OCP的女性支付的索赔数据,以检查避孕药具的持续使用情况和服务利用情况。
2003年1月首次就诊时获得13个周期OCP的女性在2003年全年共获得14.5个周期,而首次就诊时获得3个周期的女性为9.0个周期。在控制了客户特征后,获得13个周期的女性手头有OCP的可能性比获得3个周期的女性高28%,有足够的OCP周期进行15个月持续使用的可能性是后者的两倍。最初发放13个周期的女性中口服避孕药的浪费率(发放周期的6.5%)高于获得3个周期的女性(周期的2%)。尽管就诊次数少一次,但发放13个周期的女性比最初发放周期较少的女性更有可能接受巴氏涂片和衣原体检测,而进行妊娠试验的可能性较小。在这一年中,家庭PACT为2003年首次就诊时获得3个周期的女性多支付99美元,为仅获得1个周期的女性多支付44美元,而对于首次就诊时获得13个周期的女性支付的费用则较少。
与每次就诊发放较少周期的OCP相比,向女性发放一年供应量的OCP周期与更高的方法持续使用率和更低的成本相关。
II-2。