• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型抗癫痫药物在成年癫痫患者中的精神和行为副作用。

Psychiatric and behavioral side effects of the newer antiepileptic drugs in adults with epilepsy.

作者信息

Weintraub D, Buchsbaum R, Resor S R, Hirsch L J

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Columbia University Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Epilepsy Behav. 2007 Feb;10(1):105-10. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2006.08.008. Epub 2006 Oct 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2006.08.008
PMID:17079191
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Psychiatric/behavioral side effects (PSEs) are common in patients taking antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). The objective of the study described here was to compare the PSE profiles of the newer AEDs.

METHODS

We examined the charts of 1394 adult outpatients seen at the Columbia Comprehensive Epilepsy Center who had taken one of the newer AEDs. We compared the rate of AED-related PSEs in patients newly started on the newer AEDs both before and after controlling for non-AED predictors of PSEs.

RESULTS

Overall, 221 of 1394 (16%) patients experienced PSEs. The average rate of AED-related PSEs for a single AED was 8.4%, with 6.1% resulting in dosage change and 4.3% resulting in AED discontinuation. Significantly fewer PSEs were attributed to gabapentin (n=160, 0.6% incidence, P<0.001) and lamotrigine (n=547, 4.8% incidence, P<0.001), and significantly more PSEs were attributed to levetiracetam (n=521, 15.7% incidence, P<0.001; 8.8% discontinued LEV because of PSEs). Vigabatrin, felbamate, and oxcarbazepine were associated with similarly low rates of PSEs in many analyses but with fewer of patients. Tiagabine was associated with high PSE rates (similar to those for levetiracetam), but was used much less commonly at our center. Intermediate rates of PSEs were attributed to topiramate and zonisamide (both nonsignificant). Psychiatric history was the most significant nondrug predictor of AED-related PSEs (PSEs occurred in 23% of patients with a psychiatric history vs 12% of patients without such a history, P<0.001). The relative rates of AED-related PSEs were similar when controlling for non-AED predictors and when analyzing only patients on monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

There are significant differences between the newer AEDs in terms of their PSE profiles. Patients taking levetiracetan experience significantly more PSEs than average, and patients taking gabapentin and lamotrigine experience significantly fewer PSEs. Even with the medication with the highest rate of PSEs (levetiracetam), less than 10% of patients discontinued it because of PSEs. A past psychiatric condition is the most significant nondrug predictor of AED-related PSEs.

摘要

目的

精神/行为副作用(PSEs)在服用抗癫痫药物(AEDs)的患者中很常见。本文所述研究的目的是比较新型AEDs的PSEs情况。

方法

我们查阅了哥伦比亚综合癫痫中心1394例成年门诊患者的病历,这些患者服用过一种新型AEDs。我们比较了刚开始服用新型AEDs的患者在控制PSEs的非AED预测因素前后与AED相关的PSEs发生率。

结果

总体而言,1394例患者中有221例(16%)出现了PSEs。单一AED与AED相关的PSEs平均发生率为8.4%,其中6.1%导致剂量改变,4.3%导致停用AED。归因于加巴喷丁(n = 160,发生率0.6%,P < 0.001)和拉莫三嗪(n = 547,发生率4.8%,P < 0.001)的PSEs明显较少,而归因于左乙拉西坦(n = 521,发生率15.7%,P < 0.001;8.8%因PSEs停用左乙拉西坦)的PSEs明显较多。在许多分析中,vigabatrin、非氨酯和奥卡西平与PSEs发生率同样较低,但涉及的患者较少。替加宾与高PSEs发生率相关(与左乙拉西坦相似),但在我们中心使用较少。托吡酯和唑尼沙胺的PSEs发生率中等(均无统计学意义)。精神病史是与AED相关的PSEs最显著的非药物预测因素(有精神病史的患者中23%出现PSEs,无此类病史的患者中为12%,P < 0.001)。在控制非AED预测因素时以及仅分析接受单药治疗的患者时,与AED相关的PSEs相对发生率相似。

结论

新型AEDs在PSEs情况方面存在显著差异。服用左乙拉西坦的患者出现的PSEs明显多于平均水平,而服用加巴喷丁和拉莫三嗪的患者出现的PSEs明显较少。即使是PSEs发生率最高的药物(左乙拉西坦),因PSEs停用的患者也不到10%。既往精神疾病是与AED相关的PSEs最显著的非药物预测因素。

相似文献

1
Psychiatric and behavioral side effects of the newer antiepileptic drugs in adults with epilepsy.新型抗癫痫药物在成年癫痫患者中的精神和行为副作用。
Epilepsy Behav. 2007 Feb;10(1):105-10. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2006.08.008. Epub 2006 Oct 31.
2
Patient-reported cognitive side effects of antiepileptic drugs: predictors and comparison of all commonly used antiepileptic drugs.患者报告的抗癫痫药物认知副作用:所有常用抗癫痫药物的预测因素及比较
Epilepsy Behav. 2009 Jan;14(1):202-9. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2008.10.017. Epub 2008 Dec 17.
3
Psychiatric and behavioral side effects of antiepileptic drugs in adults with epilepsy.抗癫痫药物在成年癫痫患者中的精神和行为副作用。
Epilepsy Behav. 2017 Nov;76:24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.08.039. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
4
Cross-sensitivity of skin rashes with antiepileptic drug use.使用抗癫痫药物时皮疹的交叉敏感性。
Neurology. 2008 Nov 4;71(19):1527-34. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000334295.50403.4c.
5
Comparison and predictors of rash associated with 15 antiepileptic drugs.15种抗癫痫药物相关皮疹的比较及预测因素
Neurology. 2007 May 15;68(20):1701-9. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000261917.83337.db.
6
[Newer antiepileptic drugs].新型抗癫痫药物
Brain Nerve. 2007 Feb;59(2):147-56.
7
Comparative effectiveness of 10 antiepileptic drugs in older adults with epilepsy.10种抗癫痫药物对老年癫痫患者的疗效比较
Arch Neurol. 2010 Apr;67(4):408-15. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2010.49.
8
[Current pharmacotherapy of epilepsy in adults].[成人癫痫的当前药物治疗]
Bull Soc Sci Med Grand Duche Luxemb. 2005(3):263-81.
9
Positive and negative psychotropic effects of levetiracetam.左乙拉西坦的正负精神药物效应。
Epilepsy Behav. 2008 Oct;13(3):535-41. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2008.05.012. Epub 2008 Jun 25.
10
Effect of age and comedication on levetiracetam pharmacokinetics and tolerability.年龄及合并用药对左乙拉西坦药代动力学和耐受性的影响。
Epilepsia. 2007 Jul;48(7):1351-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01043.x. Epub 2007 Jun 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk of Poststroke Epilepsy Among Young Adults With Ischemic Stroke or Intracerebral Hemorrhage.缺血性中风或脑出血的年轻成年人发生中风后癫痫的风险
JAMA Neurol. 2025 Apr 14. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.0465.
2
Assessment of aggressive behavior in Dravet syndrome: a critical look.对德雷维特综合征攻击性行为的评估:批判性审视。
Front Integr Neurosci. 2024 Apr 29;18:1403681. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2024.1403681. eCollection 2024.
3
Gender differences in quality of life and psychiatric comorbidities among persons with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy: A single-center cross-sectional study.
青少年肌阵挛癫痫患者生活质量和精神共病的性别差异:一项单中心横断面研究。
J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2023 Jul-Sep;14(3):482-487. doi: 10.25259/JNRP_34_2023. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
4
The impact of anti-seizure medications on psychiatric disorders among children with epilepsy: Both a challenge and an opportunity?抗癫痫药物对癫痫患儿精神障碍的影响:既是挑战也是机遇?
J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2023 Aug;32(3):177-184. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
5
A review of cognitive and behavioral outcomes of Brivaracetam.布瓦西坦的认知和行为结果的综述。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2023 Feb;39(2):104-114. doi: 10.1002/kjm2.12648. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
6
Epilepsy treatment in neuro-oncology: A rationale for drug choice in common clinical scenarios.神经肿瘤学中的癫痫治疗:常见临床场景下药物选择的基本原理。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Oct 6;13:991244. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.991244. eCollection 2022.
7
Interictal Heart Rate Variability as a Biomarker for Comorbid Depressive Disorders among People with Epilepsy.发作间期心率变异性作为癫痫患者共病抑郁障碍的生物标志物
Brain Sci. 2022 May 20;12(5):671. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12050671.
8
Optimization of Therapy in Patients with Epilepsy and Psychiatric Comorbidities: Key Points.癫痫合并精神共病患者的治疗优化:要点。
Curr Neuropharmacol. 2023;21(8):1755-1766. doi: 10.2174/1570159X20666220526144314.
9
Psychiatric comorbidity and quality of life in patients with epilepsy on anti-epileptic monotherapy and polytherapy.接受抗癫痫单药治疗和多药治疗的癫痫患者的精神共病与生活质量
Tzu Chi Med J. 2021 Jul 23;34(2):226-231. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_34_21. eCollection 2022 Apr-Jun.
10
Psychiatric and Behavioural Side Effects Associated With Perampanel in Patients With Temporal Lobe Epilepsy. A Real-World Experience.颞叶癫痫患者使用吡仑帕奈的精神和行为副作用。一项真实世界经验。
Front Neurol. 2022 Mar 7;13:839985. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.839985. eCollection 2022.