Nelson Paul C, Carney Laurel H
Department of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering and Institute for Sensory Research, 621 Skytop Road, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA.
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Jan;97(1):522-39. doi: 10.1152/jn.00776.2006. Epub 2006 Nov 1.
Neural responses to amplitude-modulated (AM) tones in the unanesthetized rabbit inferior colliculus (IC) were studied in an effort to establish explicit relationships between physiological and psychophysical measures of temporal envelope processing. Specifically, responses to variations in modulation depth (m) at the cell's best modulation frequency, with and without modulation maskers, were quantified in terms of average rate and synchronization to the envelope over the entire perceptual dynamic range of depths. Statistically significant variations in the metrics were used to define neural AM detection and discrimination thresholds. Synchrony emerged at modulation depths comparable with psychophysical AM detection sensitivities in some neurons, whereas the lowest rate-based neural thresholds could not account for psychoacoustical thresholds. The majority of rate thresholds (85%) were -10 dB or higher (in 20 log m), and 16% of the population exhibited no systematic dependence of average rate on m. Neural thresholds for AM detection did not decrease systematically at higher SPLs (as observed psychophysically): thresholds remained constant or increased with level for most cells tested at multiple sound-pressure levels (SPLs). At depths higher than the rate-based detection threshold, some rate modulation-depth functions were sufficiently steep with respect to the across-trial variability of the rate to predict depth discrimination thresholds as low as 1 dB (comparable with the psychophysics). Synchrony, on the other hand, did not vary systematically with m in many cells at high modulation depths. A simple computational model was extended to reproduce several features of the modulation frequency and depth dependence of both transient and sustained pure-tone responders.
研究了未麻醉家兔下丘(IC)对调幅(AM)音的神经反应,旨在建立时间包络处理的生理和心理物理测量之间的明确关系。具体而言,在有和没有调制掩蔽的情况下,根据细胞最佳调制频率下调制深度(m)的变化,在整个深度感知动态范围内,对平均发放率和与包络的同步性进行了量化。利用这些指标的统计学显著变化来定义神经AM检测和辨别阈值。在一些神经元中,同步性出现在与心理物理AM检测灵敏度相当的调制深度处,而基于发放率的最低神经阈值无法解释心理声学阈值。大多数发放率阈值(85%)为-10 dB或更高(以20 log m计),并且16%的群体中平均发放率对m没有系统依赖性。AM检测的神经阈值在较高声压级(SPL)下没有系统地降低(如心理物理学观察到的那样):对于在多个声压级(SPL)下测试的大多数细胞,阈值保持恒定或随声压级升高。在高于基于发放率的检测阈值的深度处,一些发放率调制深度函数相对于发放率的试验间变异性足够陡峭,以至于能够预测低至1 dB的深度辨别阈值(与心理物理学相当)。另一方面,在许多细胞中,在高调制深度下,同步性并未随m系统地变化。扩展了一个简单的计算模型,以重现瞬态和持续纯音反应者的调制频率和深度依赖性的几个特征。