Neuroscience Graduate Program, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
J Neurophysiol. 2024 Sep 1;132(3):1098-1114. doi: 10.1152/jn.00329.2024. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
Sinusoidal amplitude modulation (SAM) is a key feature of complex sounds. Although psychophysical studies have characterized SAM perception, and neurophysiological studies in anesthetized animals report a transformation from the cochlear nucleus' (CN; brainstem) temporal code to the inferior colliculus' (IC; midbrain's) rate code, none have used awake animals or nonhuman primates to compare CN and IC's coding strategies to modulation-frequency perception. To address this, we recorded single-unit responses and compared derived neurometric measures in the CN and IC to psychometric measures of modulation frequency (MF) discrimination in macaques. IC and CN neurons often exhibited tuned responses to SAM in rate and spike-timing measures of modulation coding. Neurometric thresholds spanned a large range (2-200 Hz ΔMF). The lowest 40% of IC thresholds were less than or equal to psychometric thresholds, regardless of which code was used, whereas CN thresholds were greater than psychometric thresholds. Discrimination at 10-20 Hz could be explained by indiscriminately pooling 30 units in either structure, whereas discrimination at higher MFs was best explained by more selective pooling. This suggests that pooled CN activity was sufficient for AM discrimination. Psychometric and neurometric thresholds decreased as stimulus duration increased, but IC and CN thresholds were higher and more variable than behavior at short durations. This slower subcortical temporal integration compared with behavior was consistent with a drift diffusion model that reproduced individual differences in performance and can constrain future neurophysiological studies of temporal integration. These measures provide an account of AM perception at the neurophysiological, computational, and behavioral levels. In everyday environments, the brain is tasked with extracting information from sound envelopes, which involves both sensory encoding and perceptual decision-making. Different neural codes for envelope representation have been characterized in midbrain and cortex, but studies of brainstem nuclei such as the cochlear nucleus (CN) have usually been conducted under anesthesia in nonprimate species. Here, we found that subcortical activity in awake monkeys and a biologically plausible perceptual decision-making model accounted for sound envelope discrimination behavior.
正弦幅度调制 (SAM) 是复杂声音的一个关键特征。尽管心理物理学研究已经描述了 SAM 的感知,并且麻醉动物的神经生理学研究报告了从耳蜗核 (CN; 脑干) 的时间码到下丘 (IC; 中脑) 的率码的转换,但没有一项研究使用清醒动物或非人类灵长类动物来比较 CN 和 IC 的编码策略与调制频率感知。为了解决这个问题,我们记录了单单位响应,并将 CN 和 IC 中的衍生神经测量与猕猴调制频率 (MF) 辨别力的心理测量进行了比较。IC 和 CN 神经元在 SAM 的率和尖峰定时调制编码的测量中经常表现出调谐响应。神经测量阈值范围很广(2-200 Hz ΔMF)。无论使用哪种代码,IC 的最低 40%的阈值都小于或等于心理阈值,而 CN 的阈值则大于心理阈值。在 10-20 Hz 时的辨别力可以通过在这两种结构中随机组合 30 个单位来解释,而在较高 MF 时的辨别力则可以通过更具选择性的组合来更好地解释。这表明,组合的 CN 活动足以进行 AM 辨别。心理和神经测量阈值随刺激持续时间的增加而降低,但 IC 和 CN 阈值在短持续时间内高于行为阈值且更具可变性。与行为相比,这种较慢的下丘 temporal 整合与可以复制性能个体差异的漂移扩散模型一致,并且可以约束时间整合的未来神经生理学研究。这些测量值在神经生理学、计算和行为水平上提供了 AM 感知的解释。在日常生活环境中,大脑的任务是从声音包络中提取信息,这涉及到感觉编码和感知决策。在中脑和皮层中已经描述了不同的包络表示神经码,但对耳蜗核 (CN) 等脑干核的研究通常是在非灵长类动物的麻醉下进行的。在这里,我们发现,在清醒猴子和生物上合理的感知决策模型中的下丘活动解释了声音包络辨别行为。