Wake Melissa, Tobin Sherryn, Cone-Wesson Barbara, Dahl Hans-Henrik, Gillam Lynn, McCormick Lisa, Poulakis Zeffie, Rickards Field W, Saunders Kerryn, Ukoumunne Obioha C, Williams Joanne
Centre for Community Child Health, Royal Children's Hospital, Flemington Rd, Parkville 3052, Australia.
Pediatrics. 2006 Nov;118(5):1842-51. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-3168.
The goal was to determine the prevalence and effects of slight/mild bilateral sensorineural hearing loss among children in elementary school.
A cross-sectional, cluster-sample survey of 6581 children (response: 85%; grade 1: n = 3367; grade 5: n = 3214) in 89 schools in Melbourne, Australia, was performed. Slight/mild bilateral sensorineural hearing loss was defined as a low-frequency pure-tone average across 0.5, 1, and 2 kHz and/or a high-frequency pure-tone average across 3, 4, and 6 kHz of 16 to 40 dB hearing level in the better ear, with air/bone-conduction gaps of < 10 dB. Parents reported children's health-related quality of life and behavior. Each child with slight/mild bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, matched to 2 normally hearing children (low-frequency pure-tone average and high-frequency pure-tone average of < or = 15 dB hearing level in both ears), completed standardized assessments. Whole-sample comparisons were adjusted for type of school, grade level, and gender, and matched-sample comparisons were adjusted for nonverbal IQ scores.
Fifty-five children (0.88%) had slight/mild bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Children with and without sensorineural hearing loss scored similarly in language (mean: 97.2 vs 99.7), reading (101.1 vs 102.8), behavior (8.4 vs 7.0), and parent- and child-reported child health-related quality of life (77.6 vs 80.0 and 76.1 vs 77.0, respectively), but phonologic short-term memory was poorer (91.0 vs 102.8) in the sensorineural hearing loss group.
The prevalence of slight/mild bilateral sensorineural hearing loss was lower than reported in previous studies. There was no strong evidence that slight/mild bilateral sensorineural hearing loss affects adversely language, reading, behavior, or health-related quality of life in children who are otherwise healthy and of normal intelligence.
确定小学儿童中轻度/中度双侧感音神经性听力损失的患病率及其影响。
对澳大利亚墨尔本89所学校的658名儿童(应答率:85%;一年级:n = 3367;五年级:n = 3214)进行了一项横断面整群抽样调查。轻度/中度双侧感音神经性听力损失定义为较好耳在0.5、1和2千赫的低频纯音平均听阈和/或在3、4和6千赫的高频纯音平均听阈为16至40分贝听力级,气导/骨导差<10分贝。家长报告了孩子与健康相关的生活质量和行为。每例轻度/中度双侧感音神经性听力损失儿童与2例听力正常儿童(双耳低频纯音平均听阈和高频纯音平均听阈≤15分贝听力级)匹配,完成标准化评估。对全样本比较进行了学校类型、年级水平和性别的校正,对匹配样本比较进行了非言语智商分数的校正。
55名儿童(0.88%)有轻度/中度双侧感音神经性听力损失。有感音神经性听力损失和无感音神经性听力损失的儿童在语言(平均分:97.2对99.7)、阅读(101.1对102.8)、行为(8.4对7.0)以及家长和孩子报告的与孩子健康相关的生活质量(分别为77.6对80.0和76.1对77.0)方面得分相似,但感音神经性听力损失组的语音短期记忆较差(91.0对102.8)。
轻度/中度双侧感音神经性听力损失的患病率低于先前研究报告。没有有力证据表明轻度/中度双侧感音神经性听力损失会对其他方面健康且智力正常的儿童的语言、阅读、行为或与健康相关的生活质量产生不利影响。