Suppr超能文献

基于身长的(布罗泽洛)卷尺、高级儿科生命支持(APLS)、阿加尔公式和纳尔逊公式能否准确估算印度儿童的体重?

Do the length-based (Broselow) Tape, APLS, Argall and Nelson's formulae accurately estimate weight of Indian children?

作者信息

Varghese A, Vasudevan V K, Lewin S, Indumathi C K, Dinakar C, Rao S D Subha

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, St. John's Medical College Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka 560 034, India.

出版信息

Indian Pediatr. 2006 Oct;43(10):889-94.

Abstract

This study was aimed at validating the usefulness of a length based pediatric emergency tape (Broselow) in an Indian population. The secondary objective was to validate age based weight estimation formulae (Nelson, Argalls, APLS) for emergency needs (doses, sizes). This cross sectional study was done at a tertiary teaching hospital on a sample of 500 children attending outpatient clinic. Inclusion criteria was age between 1 month to 12 years. Children who were unstable, uncooperative or critically ill requiring emergency care and those measuring more than 145 cm in length or weighing more than 35 kg weight were excluded from the study. Measurement of actual weights, calculation of weight, adrenaline dose, fluid bolus and endotracheal tube size was done by all four methods. Results indicated good positive correlation between actual measured weights and weights estimated using Broselow Tape (r = 0.974), APLS (r = 0.902), Argalls modification (r = 0.902), and combined Nelson formulae (0.935). However, specific Nelson formulas for 7-12 yr and 3-12 mo were especially poor in correlation. Bland-Altman Plots comparing actual weight showed least mean bias for Broselow Tape estimations in < 15 kg group (0.080 +/- 0.96 kg) and maximum bias with Nelsons formula for 7 to12 yr (5.204 +/- 4.272 kg). For adrenaline doses and fluid bolus calculations, Broselow estimations were valid estimates. Broselow tape did underestimate endotracheal tube size (mean bias -0.53 +/- 0.18). To conclude, length based pediatric emergency tape (Broselow) correlates well with overall emergency decision making process in our setting. This is especially validated in the age group 0.1 to 6.7 yr weighing less than 15 kg.

摘要

本研究旨在验证基于长度的儿科急救胶带(布罗泽洛)在印度人群中的实用性。次要目标是验证基于年龄的体重估计公式(纳尔逊、阿加尔斯、高级儿科生命支持)在急救需求(剂量、尺寸)方面的有效性。这项横断面研究在一家三级教学医院对500名门诊儿童样本进行。纳入标准为年龄在1个月至12岁之间。不稳定、不合作或病情危急需要急救的儿童,以及身高超过145厘米或体重超过35千克的儿童被排除在研究之外。所有四种方法都进行了实际体重测量、体重计算、肾上腺素剂量、液体冲击量和气管插管尺寸的计算。结果表明,实际测量体重与使用布罗泽洛胶带(r = 0.974)、高级儿科生命支持(r = 0.902)、阿加尔斯修正法(r = 0.902)和综合纳尔逊公式(0.935)估计的体重之间存在良好的正相关。然而,7至12岁和3至12个月的特定纳尔逊公式相关性特别差。比较实际体重的布兰德-奥特曼图显示,在体重<15千克组中,布罗泽洛胶带估计的平均偏差最小(0.080 +/- 0.96千克),而7至12岁的纳尔逊公式偏差最大(5.204 +/- 4.272千克)。对于肾上腺素剂量和液体冲击量的计算,布罗泽洛估计是有效的估计。布罗泽洛胶带确实低估了气管插管尺寸(平均偏差 -0.53 +/- 0.18)。总之,基于长度的儿科急救胶带(布罗泽洛)与我们环境中的总体急救决策过程相关性良好。这在年龄组0.1至6.7岁、体重小于15千克的人群中尤其得到验证。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验