Zubeidat Ihab, Salinas José María, Sierra Juan Carlos, Fernández-Parra Antonio
Department of Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treatment, University of Granada, Spain.
J Anxiety Disord. 2007;21(5):603-24. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.09.010. Epub 2006 Nov 3.
In this study, we analyzed the reliability and validity of the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS) and propose a separation criterion between youths with specific and generalized social anxiety and youths without social anxiety. A sample of 1012 Spanish youths attending school completed the SIAS, the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale, the Social Avoidance and Distress Scale, the Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale, the Youth Self-Report for Ages 11-18 and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-Adolescent. The factor analysis suggests the existence of three factors in the SIAS, the first two of which explain most of the variance of the construct assessed. Internal consistency is adequate in the first two factors. The SIAS features an adequate theoretical validity with the scores of different variables related to social interaction. Analysis of the criterion scores yields three groups pertaining to three clearly differentiated clusters. In the third cluster, two of social anxiety groups - specific and generalized - have been identified by means of a quantitative separation criterion.
在本研究中，我们分析了社交互动焦虑量表（SIAS）的信度和效度，并提出了患有特定社交焦虑和广泛性社交焦虑的青少年与无社交焦虑青少年之间的区分标准。1012名西班牙在校青少年样本完成了社交互动焦虑量表、利博维茨社交焦虑量表、社交回避与苦恼量表、消极评价恐惧量表、11 - 18岁青少年自我报告以及明尼苏达多相人格调查表青少年版。因素分析表明社交互动焦虑量表存在三个因素，其中前两个因素解释了所评估结构的大部分方差。前两个因素的内部一致性良好。社交互动焦虑量表与不同社交互动相关变量的得分具有充分的理论效度。对标准分数的分析产生了属于三个明显不同聚类的三组。在第三组聚类中，通过定量区分标准识别出了社交焦虑的两个组——特定社交焦虑组和广泛性社交焦虑组。
