• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项基于学校的预防烟草、酒精和药物使用的整群随机对照试验:欧盟-Dap设计与研究人群。

A cluster randomized controlled trial of school-based prevention of tobacco, alcohol and drug use: the EU-Dap design and study population.

作者信息

Faggiano Fabrizio, Richardson Clive, Bohrn Karl, Galanti M Rosaria

机构信息

Piemonte Monitoring Centre for Drug Abuse, Torino, Italy.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2007 Feb;44(2):170-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.09.010. Epub 2006 Nov 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.09.010
PMID:17084887
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The empirical evidence of effectiveness of many school-based programs against substance abuse is rather weak. The EU-Dap study is a multicenter cluster randomized community trial (CRCT) designed to evaluate such a program. This paper presents study design and baseline characteristics of the study population.

METHODS

170 schools from 9 centers from seven countries (Austria, Belgium, Germany, Greece, Italy, Spain, Sweden), stratified according to average social status in the catchment area, were randomized to either three variants of the active intervention (basic curriculum, basic with peer involvement, and basic with parent involvement) or to a control group. The program under evaluation is based on a comprehensive social influence approach, and was delivered during the scholar year 2004-2005 to a population of 12- to 14-year-old students attending junior high school. An anonymous questionnaire administered before and after the intervention was used to track behavioral and attitudinal changes.

RESULTS

All in all, we included in the study 143 schools and 7079 students, of which 3547 in the intervention groups and 3532 in the control group. At baseline, 34.9% of students had smoked cigarettes, 24.7% had been drunk, and 8.9% had used cannabis at least once in life.

DISCUSSION

EU-Dap is the first European multicenter randomized study to evaluate the effectiveness of a school program targeting tobacco, alcohol and drug use. The baseline assessment showed high prevalence and wide geographical variations of substance use.

摘要

背景

许多以学校为基础的预防药物滥用项目的有效性实证证据相当薄弱。欧盟-达普研究是一项多中心整群随机社区试验(CRCT),旨在评估这样一个项目。本文介绍了该研究的设计和研究人群的基线特征。

方法

来自七个国家(奥地利、比利时、德国、希腊、意大利、西班牙、瑞典)9个中心的170所学校,根据集水区的平均社会地位进行分层,被随机分为积极干预的三种变体(基础课程、有同伴参与的基础课程和有家长参与的基础课程)或对照组。所评估的项目基于一种全面的社会影响方法,于2004 - 2005学年针对12至14岁的初中学生群体实施。通过在干预前后进行的匿名问卷调查来追踪行为和态度的变化。

结果

总体而言,我们的研究纳入了143所学校和7079名学生,其中干预组有3547名学生,对照组有3532名学生。在基线时,34.9%的学生曾经吸烟,24.7%的学生曾经饮酒,8.9%的学生一生中至少使用过一次大麻。

讨论

欧盟-达普是第一项评估针对烟草、酒精和药物使用的学校项目有效性进行评估的欧洲多中心随机研究。基线评估显示药物使用的高患病率和广泛的地理差异。

相似文献

1
A cluster randomized controlled trial of school-based prevention of tobacco, alcohol and drug use: the EU-Dap design and study population.一项基于学校的预防烟草、酒精和药物使用的整群随机对照试验:欧盟-Dap设计与研究人群。
Prev Med. 2007 Feb;44(2):170-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.09.010. Epub 2006 Nov 3.
2
Is universal prevention against youths' substance misuse really universal? Gender-specific effects in the EU-Dap school-based prevention trial.普遍预防青少年物质滥用真的普遍吗?基于学校的欧盟 Dap 预防试验中的性别特异性效应。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009 Sep;63(9):722-8. doi: 10.1136/jech.2008.081513. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
3
The effectiveness of a school-based substance abuse prevention program: 18-month follow-up of the EU-Dap cluster randomized controlled trial.基于学校的药物滥用预防计划的效果:欧盟-Dap 集群随机对照试验的 18 个月随访。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010 Apr 1;108(1-2):56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.11.018. Epub 2010 Jan 18.
4
Short-term mediating factors of a school-based intervention to prevent youth substance use in Europe.欧洲一项预防青少年药物使用的校本干预措施的短期中介因素
J Adolesc Health. 2014 May;54(5):565-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.10.009. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
5
The effectiveness of a school-based substance abuse prevention program: EU-Dap cluster randomised controlled trial.一项基于学校的药物滥用预防计划的有效性:欧盟-达普整群随机对照试验。
Prev Med. 2008 Nov;47(5):537-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.06.018. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
6
A cluster randomised trial of a school-based resilience intervention to decrease tobacco, alcohol and illicit drug use in secondary school students: study protocol.一项基于学校的韧性干预措施的整群随机试验,以减少中学生的烟草、酒精和非法药物使用:研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Nov 21;12:1009. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1009.
7
Effectiveness of a pragmatic school-based universal resilience intervention in reducing tobacco, alcohol and illicit substance use in a population of adolescents: cluster-randomised controlled trial.一项基于学校的实用普遍抗逆力干预措施在减少青少年群体烟草、酒精和非法药物使用方面的效果:整群随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 18;7(8):e016060. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016060.
8
Rationale, design and conduct of a comprehensive evaluation of a school-based peer-led anti-smoking intervention in the UK: the ASSIST cluster randomised trial [ISRCTN55572965].英国一项基于学校的同伴主导的戒烟干预综合评估的基本原理、设计与实施:ASSIST整群随机试验[ISRCTN55572965]
BMC Public Health. 2005 Apr 22;5:43. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-5-43.
9
Effectiveness of the universal prevention program 'Healthy School and Drugs': study protocol of a randomized clustered trial.“健康学校与毒品”通用预防计划的效果:一项随机整群试验的研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2010 Sep 8;10:541. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-541.
10
A school-based peer-led smoking prevention intervention with extracurricular activities: the LILT-LdP cluster randomized controlled trial design and study population.一项以学校为基础、同伴主导并伴有课外活动的吸烟预防干预措施:LILT-LdP整群随机对照试验设计与研究人群
Tumori. 2013 Sep-Oct;99(5):572-7. doi: 10.1177/030089161309900502.

引用本文的文献

1
Fadeout and persistence of intervention impacts on social-emotional and cognitive skills in children and adolescents: A meta-analytic review of randomized controlled trials.干预对儿童和青少年社会情感和认知技能的影响的淡出和持续:随机对照试验的荟萃分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2024 Oct;150(10):1207-1236. doi: 10.1037/bul0000450.
2
The Unplugged program in Chile ("Yo Sé Lo Que Quiero") for substance use prevention among early adolescents: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.智利“我知道我想要什么”(Yo Sé Lo Que Quiero)青少年物质使用预防脱机项目:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Jan 25;23(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05904-3.
3
Validation of the European Drug Addiction Prevention Trial Questionnaire (EU-Dap) for substance use screening and to assess risk and protective factors among early adolescents in Chile.
验证欧洲药物滥用预防试验问卷(EU-Dap)在智利青少年中进行物质使用筛查以及评估风险和保护因素的适用性。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 11;16(10):e0258288. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258288. eCollection 2021.
4
Does parental permissiveness toward cigarette smoking and alcohol use influence illicit drug use among adolescents? A longitudinal study in seven European countries.父母对吸烟和饮酒的放任态度是否会影响青少年的非法药物使用?七个欧洲国家的纵向研究。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2022 Jan;57(1):173-181. doi: 10.1007/s00127-021-02118-5. Epub 2021 Jun 13.
5
Belief patterns and drug use in a sample of Brazilian youth: an exploratory latent class analysis.巴西青年样本中的信念模式与药物使用:探索性潜在类别分析。
Braz J Psychiatry. 2020;42(3):278-285. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2019-0706. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
6
Methodological Issues With Coding Participants in Anonymous Psychological Longitudinal Studies.匿名心理纵向研究中对参与者进行编码的方法学问题。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2020 Feb;80(1):163-185. doi: 10.1177/0013164419843576. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
7
Family-based prevention programmes for alcohol use in young people.针对年轻人饮酒问题的家庭预防计划。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 19;3(3):CD012287. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012287.pub2.
8
Subgrouping High School Students for Substance Abuse-Related Behaviors: A Latent Class Analysis.对高中生与药物滥用相关行为进行亚组划分:潜在类别分析。
Am J Mens Health. 2017 Jul;11(4):1200-1207. doi: 10.1177/1557988316669046. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
9
'Klar bleiben': a school-based alcohol prevention programme for German adolescents-study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.“保持清醒”:一项针对德国青少年的校内酒精预防计划——一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2015 Nov 16;5(11):e010141. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010141.
10
Family-based programmes for preventing smoking by children and adolescents.针对儿童和青少年预防吸烟的家庭干预项目。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 27;2015(2):CD004493. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004493.pub3.