• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[超越传播:哥伦比亚波哥大一个研究项目中研究人员与决策者互动的经验教训]

[Beyond dissemination: lessons from the interaction between researchers and decision-makers during a research project in Bogotá, Colombia].

作者信息

Hernández-Bello Amparo, Vega-Romero Román

机构信息

Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Administrativas, Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia.

出版信息

Cad Saude Publica. 2006;22 Suppl:S77-85. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2006001300017.

DOI:10.1590/s0102-311x2006001300017
PMID:17086341
Abstract

This paper discusses the experiences and conceptual and theoretical lessons learned during interaction between researchers, policy-makers, program beneficiaries, and other actors in a research project on social protection, health, and forced displacement in Bogotá, Colombia. The article begins by presenting the methodological approach and a description of interaction between various actors. This experience provides the basis for a conceptual discussion on the factors and determinants of research use. The article also highlights the need for taking an epistemological view beyond the positivist and rationalist underpinnings of the dominant explanations concerning interaction between researchers and decision-makers.

摘要

本文讨论了在哥伦比亚波哥大开展的一项关于社会保护、健康和被迫流离失所问题的研究项目中,研究人员、政策制定者、项目受益者及其他行为体之间互动过程中的经验以及概念和理论方面的收获。文章开篇介绍了方法论途径以及各行为体之间互动的描述。这一经验为关于研究成果应用的因素和决定因素的概念性讨论奠定了基础。文章还强调,需要超越关于研究人员与决策者之间互动的主流解释所基于的实证主义和理性主义基础,采取一种认识论视角。

相似文献

1
[Beyond dissemination: lessons from the interaction between researchers and decision-makers during a research project in Bogotá, Colombia].[超越传播:哥伦比亚波哥大一个研究项目中研究人员与决策者互动的经验教训]
Cad Saude Publica. 2006;22 Suppl:S77-85. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2006001300017.
2
[Research for decision-making: a case study in Brazil].[决策研究:巴西的一个案例分析]
Cad Saude Publica. 2006;22 Suppl:S57-67. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2006001300015.
3
Cross-sector learning among researchers and policy-makers: the search for new strategies to enable use of research results.研究人员与政策制定者之间的跨部门学习:寻求使研究成果得以应用的新策略。
Cad Saude Publica. 2006;22 Suppl:S97-108. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2006001300019.
4
[Interaction between researchers and decision-makers: a case study].[研究人员与决策者之间的互动:一项案例研究]
Cad Saude Publica. 2006;22 Suppl:S47-56. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2006001300014.
5
[An innovative proposal for health insurance policies based on research results: the case of unemployed in Medellin, Colombia].基于研究结果的医疗保险政策创新提案:以哥伦比亚麦德林市的失业者为例
Cad Saude Publica. 2006;22 Suppl:S87-96. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2006001300018.
6
How is the use of research evidence in health policy perceived? A comparison between the reporting of researchers and policy-makers.研究证据在卫生政策中的应用是如何被感知的?研究人员和政策制定者报告的比较。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Jul 20;16(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0345-6.
7
Development of oral health policy in Nigeria: an analysis of the role of context, actors and policy process.尼日利亚口腔健康政策的发展:对背景、行为主体及政策过程作用的分析
BMC Oral Health. 2015 May 6;15:56. doi: 10.1186/s12903-015-0040-8.
8
Partnership experiences: involving decision-makers in the research process.合作经验:让决策者参与研究过程。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003 Oct;8 Suppl 2:26-34. doi: 10.1258/135581903322405144.
9
Helping health service researchers and policy makers speak the same language.助力卫生服务研究人员和政策制定者达成共识。
Health Serv Res. 2015 Feb;50(1):1-11. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12198. Epub 2014 Jul 7.
10
Linking researchers and policy-makers: some challenges and approaches.连接研究人员与政策制定者:一些挑战与方法
Cad Saude Publica. 2006;22 Suppl:S69-76. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2006001300016.