• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

局灶性经颅刺激诱发的运动诱发电位潜伏期会因刺激的头皮位置不同而变化。

Latency of motor evoked potentials to focal transcranial stimulation varies as a function of scalp positions stimulated.

作者信息

Fuhr P, Cohen L G, Roth B J, Hallett M

机构信息

Human Cortical Physiology Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.

出版信息

Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991 Apr;81(2):81-9. doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(91)90001-e.

DOI:10.1016/0168-5597(91)90001-e
PMID:1708718
Abstract

We recorded motor evoked potentials (MEP) to transcranial magnetic stimulation from abductor pollicis brevis (APB), flexor carpi radialis (FCR), biceps brachii and deltoid muscles at rest and during slight voluntary activation. An 8-shaped coil connected to a Cadwell MES-10 magnetic stimulator was positioned over different scalp positions 1 cm apart. At least 24 stimuli were delivered at each location. Latencies of MEPs were compared with those obtained by electrical and magnetic stimulation during muscle activation. Progressively longer MEP latencies were obtained in 5 groups depending on the type and position of stimulation. The shortest latencies were obtained with (1) electrical stimulation during muscle contraction and (2) non-focal magnetic stimulation during muscle contraction; magnetic stimulation at rest produced longer latencies with stimulation of (3) an optimal position, (4) a suboptimal position, and (5) a non-optimal position. Mean latency differences between successive groups were 1.9, 2.0, 1.6, and 2.6 msec for APB. Similar latency differences were found for the other arm muscles. The results are compatible with the hypothesis that the different latencies evoked by stimulation at different scalp locations are determined by the summation at spinal motoneurons of excitatory postsynaptic potentials generated by successive numbers of I waves.

摘要

我们记录了静息状态及轻微自主激活状态下,拇短展肌(APB)、桡侧腕屈肌(FCR)、肱二头肌和三角肌对经颅磁刺激的运动诱发电位(MEP)。将一个连接到Cadwell MES - 10磁刺激器的8字形线圈放置在相距1厘米的不同头皮位置上。每个位置至少给予24次刺激。将MEP的潜伏期与肌肉激活期间通过电刺激和磁刺激获得的潜伏期进行比较。根据刺激的类型和位置,在5组中获得了逐渐延长的MEP潜伏期。最短的潜伏期出现在以下情况:(1)肌肉收缩时的电刺激,以及(2)肌肉收缩时的非聚焦磁刺激;静息时的磁刺激在刺激以下位置时产生较长的潜伏期:(3)最佳位置,(4)次佳位置,以及(5)非最佳位置。APB连续几组之间的平均潜伏期差异分别为1.9、2.0、1.6和2.6毫秒。在其他手臂肌肉中也发现了类似的潜伏期差异。这些结果与以下假设相符:在不同头皮位置进行刺激所诱发的不同潜伏期是由脊髓运动神经元对连续多个I波产生的兴奋性突触后电位的总和所决定的。

相似文献

1
Latency of motor evoked potentials to focal transcranial stimulation varies as a function of scalp positions stimulated.局灶性经颅刺激诱发的运动诱发电位潜伏期会因刺激的头皮位置不同而变化。
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991 Apr;81(2):81-9. doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(91)90001-e.
2
Topographic mapping of the human motor cortex with magnetic stimulation: factors affecting accuracy and reproducibility.利用磁刺激对人类运动皮层进行地形图绘制:影响准确性和可重复性的因素。
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992 Feb;85(1):9-16. doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(92)90095-s.
3
Noninvasive mapping of muscle representations in human motor cortex.
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992 Feb;85(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(92)90094-r.
4
Topography of the inhibitory and excitatory responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation in a hand muscle.手部肌肉对经颅磁刺激的抑制性和兴奋性反应的地形图。
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1993 Dec;89(6):424-33. doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(93)90116-7.
5
Responses to rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex.对人类运动皮层快速率经颅磁刺激的反应。
Brain. 1994 Aug;117 ( Pt 4):847-58. doi: 10.1093/brain/117.4.847.
6
Modulation of motor activity by cutaneous input: inhibition of the magnetic motor evoked potential by digital electrical stimulation.皮肤输入对运动活动的调节:手指电刺激对磁运动诱发电位的抑制作用。
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1995 Apr;97(2):114-25. doi: 10.1016/0924-980x(94)00310-4.
7
Responses in small hand muscles from magnetic stimulation of the human brain.人脑磁刺激引起的手部小肌肉反应。
J Physiol. 1987 Jul;388:397-419. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016621.
8
Spread of electrical activity at cortical level after repetitive magnetic stimulation in normal subjects.正常受试者重复磁刺激后皮质水平电活动的传播
Exp Brain Res. 2002 Nov;147(2):186-92. doi: 10.1007/s00221-002-1237-z. Epub 2002 Sep 20.
9
Non-invasive differentiation of motor cortical representation of hand muscles by mapping of optimal current directions.通过最佳电流方向映射对手部肌肉运动皮质代表区进行无创分化。
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1994 Feb;93(1):42-8. doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(94)90090-6.
10
Reinforcement of motor evoked potentials in patients with spinal cord injury.脊髓损伤患者运动诱发电位的增强
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 1991;43:312-29.

引用本文的文献

1
Mapping the Cortical Representation of Paraspinal Muscles Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Optimized in People With Chronic Back Pain.使用经颅磁刺激映射慢性背痛患者优化后的椎旁肌皮质代表区。
Basic Clin Neurosci. 2023 Nov-Dec;14(6):827-841. doi: 10.32598/bcn.2023.4419.1. Epub 2023 Nov 1.
2
Motor evoked potential latency and duration from tibialis anterior in individuals with chronic stroke.慢性卒中患者胫前肌运动诱发电位的潜伏期和时程
Exp Brain Res. 2021 Jul;239(7):2251-2260. doi: 10.1007/s00221-021-06144-2. Epub 2021 May 31.
3
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as a potential treatment approach for cannabis use disorder.
重复经颅磁刺激作为一种治疗大麻使用障碍的潜在方法。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 13;109:110290. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2021.110290. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
4
Stimulus Intensity Affects Variability of Motor Evoked Responses of the Non-Paretic, but Not Paretic Tibialis Anterior Muscle in Stroke.刺激强度影响中风患者非瘫痪侧而非瘫痪侧胫前肌运动诱发电位的变异性。
Brain Sci. 2020 May 15;10(5):297. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10050297.
5
Increased Finger-Tapping Related Cerebellar Activation in Cervical Dystonia, Enhanced by Transcranial Stimulation: An Indicator of Compensation?经颅刺激增强的颈部肌张力障碍中与手指敲击相关的小脑激活增加:一种代偿指标?
Front Neurol. 2019 Mar 15;10:231. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00231. eCollection 2019.
6
Reduced motor cortex inhibition and a 'cognitive-first' prioritisation strategy for older adults during dual-tasking.在双重任务中,老年人运动皮层抑制减少和“认知优先”的策略。
Exp Gerontol. 2018 Nov;113:95-105. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2018.09.018. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
7
Comprehensive Survey on Improved Focality and Penetration Depth of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Employing Multi-Coil Arrays.关于采用多线圈阵列提高经颅磁刺激的聚焦性和穿透深度的综合研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Nov 14;14(11):1388. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14111388.
8
Onset Latency of Motor Evoked Potentials in Motor Cortical Mapping with Neuronavigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.在神经导航经颅磁刺激运动皮层映射中运动诱发电位的起始潜伏期
Open Neurol J. 2015 Jul 31;9:62-9. doi: 10.2174/1874205X01509010062. eCollection 2015.
9
Nonphysiological factors in navigated TMS studies; confounding covariates and valid intracortical estimates.导航经颅磁刺激研究中的非生理因素;混杂协变量与有效的皮质内估计
Hum Brain Mapp. 2015 Jan;36(1):40-9. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22611. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
10
A higher number of TMS-elicited MEP from a combined hotspot improves intra- and inter-session reliability of the upper limb muscles in healthy individuals.来自联合热点的更多 TMS 诱发的 MEP 可提高健康个体上肢肌肉的内和间会话可靠性。
PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e47582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047582. Epub 2012 Oct 15.