Purser Jama L, Kuchibhatla Maragatha N, Fillenbaum Gerda G, Harding Tina, Peterson Eric D, Alexander Karen P
Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Nov;54(11):1674-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00914.x.
To characterize physiological variation in hospitalized older adults with severe coronary artery disease (CAD) and evaluate the prevalence of frailty in this sample, to determine whether single-item performance measures are good indicators of multidimensional frailty, and to estimate the association between frailty and 6-month mortality.
Observational cohort study.
Inpatient hospital cardiology ward.
Three hundred nine consecutive inpatients aged 70 and older admitted to a cardiology service (n = 309; 70% male, 84% white) with minimum two-vessel CAD determined using cardiac catheterization.
Two standard frailty phenotypes (Composite A and Composite B), usual gait speed, grip strength, chair stands, cardiology clinical variables, and 6-month mortality.
Prevalence of frailty was 27% for Composite A versus 63% for Composite B. Utility of single-item measures for identifying frailty was greatest for gait speed (receiver operating characteristic curve c statistic = 0.89 for Composite A, 0.70 for Composite B) followed by chair-stands (c = 0.83, 0.66) and grip strength (c = 0.78, 0.57). After adjustment, composite scores and single-item measures were individually associated with higher mortality at 6 months. Slow gait speed (< or =0.65 m/s) and poor grip strength (< or =25 kg) were stronger predictors of 6-month mortality than either composite score (gait speed odds ratio (OR)=3.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.1-13.1; grip strength OR = 2.7, 95% CI = 0.7-10.0; Composite A OR = 1.9, 95% CI = 0.60-6.1; chair-stand OR = 1.5, 95% CI = 0.5-5.1; Composite B OR = 1.3, 95% CI = 0.3-5.2).
Gait speed frailty was the strongest predictor of mortality in a population with CAD and may add to traditional risk assessments when predicting outcomes in this population.
描述患有严重冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的住院老年人的生理变化,评估该样本中衰弱的患病率,确定单项表现指标是否是多维衰弱的良好指标,并估计衰弱与6个月死亡率之间的关联。
观察性队列研究。
住院医院心脏病科病房。
连续309名年龄在70岁及以上的住院患者,入住心脏病科(n = 309;70%为男性,84%为白人),通过心脏导管检查确定至少有双支冠状动脉疾病。
两种标准衰弱表型(综合A和综合B)、平常步态速度、握力、从椅子上站起的能力、心脏病临床变量以及6个月死亡率。
综合A的衰弱患病率为27%,而综合B为63%。单项指标识别衰弱的效用在步态速度方面最大(综合A的受试者工作特征曲线c统计量 = 0.89,综合B为0.70),其次是从椅子上站起的能力(c = 0.83,0.66)和握力(c = 0.78,0.57)。调整后,综合评分和单项指标分别与6个月时较高的死亡率相关。步态速度慢(≤0.65米/秒)和握力差(≤25千克)比任何综合评分更能预测6个月死亡率(步态速度优势比(OR)= 3.8,95%置信区间(CI) = 1.1 - 13.1;握力OR = 2.7,95% CI = 0.7 - 10.0;综合A OR = 1.9,95% CI = 0.60 - 6.1;从椅子上站起的能力OR = 1.5,95% CI = 0.5 - 5.1;综合B OR = 1.3,95% CI = 0.3 - 5.2)。
在患有CAD的人群中,步态速度衰弱是死亡率最强的预测因素,在预测该人群的预后时可能补充传统风险评估。