Astle D E, Jackson G M, Swainson R
School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Brain Res. 2006 Dec 13;1125(1):94-103. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.09.092. Epub 2006 Nov 7.
Switching between different tasks is associated with performance deficits, or 'switch costs', relative to repeating the same task. Recent evidence suggests that response rather than task selection processes may be a major cause of switch costs [Schuch, S., Koch, I., 2003. The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 29 (1) 92-105]. Thus, switch costs are not incurred if on the preceding trial a task has been prepared for but no response required (a 'no-go' trial). We investigated the relationship between response selection and the subsequent preparation of an alternative task set. While switch costs were absent following 'no-go' trials, ERP differences during the precueing interval showed that response selection has implications for subsequent task preparation as well as for task performance per se. The results are discussed in relation to the dissociation of intention versus action in behavioural control and the role of inhibition in switching between task sets.
与重复相同任务相比,在不同任务之间切换与表现缺陷或“切换成本”相关。最近的证据表明,反应而非任务选择过程可能是切换成本的主要原因[舒赫,S.,科赫,I.,2003年。反应选择在任务转换中对任务集抑制的作用。《实验心理学:人类感知与表现》,29(1) 92 - 105]。因此,如果在前一次试验中已经准备好任务但不需要反应(“不执行”试验),则不会产生切换成本。我们研究了反应选择与后续替代任务集准备之间的关系。虽然在“不执行”试验后不存在切换成本,但预提示间隔期间的ERP差异表明,反应选择对后续任务准备以及任务表现本身都有影响。结合行为控制中意图与行动的分离以及抑制在任务集切换中的作用对结果进行了讨论。