Suppr超能文献

在联合任务切换中,没有证据表明存在任务集的共享表征。

No evidence for shared representations of task sets in joint task switching.

作者信息

Yamaguchi Motonori, Wall Helen J, Hommel Bernhard

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Edge Hill University, St Helens Road, Ormskirk, Lancashire, L39 4QP, UK.

Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2017 Nov;81(6):1166-1177. doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0813-y. Epub 2016 Oct 15.

Abstract

It has been suggested that actors co-represent a shared task context when they perform a task in a joint fashion. The present study examined the possibility of co-representation in joint task switching, in which two actors shared two tasks that switched randomly across trials. Experiment 1 showed that when an actor performed the tasks individually, switch costs were obtained if the actors responded on the previous trial (go trial), but not if they did not respond (no-go trial). When two actors performed the tasks jointly, switch costs were obtained if the actor responded on the previous trial (actor-repeat trials) but not if the co-actor responded (actor-switch trials). In Experiment 2, a single actor performed both tasks of the joint condition to test whether the findings of Experiment 1 were due to the use of different response sets by the two actors. Switch costs were obtained for both repetitions and alternations of the response set, which rules out this possibility. Taken together, our findings provided little support for the idea that actors co-represent the task sets of their co-actors.

摘要

有人提出,当参与者以联合方式执行任务时,他们会共同呈现一个共享的任务情境。本研究考察了在联合任务切换中共同呈现的可能性,在联合任务切换中,两个参与者共享两个在不同试验中随机切换的任务。实验1表明,当一个参与者单独执行任务时,如果该参与者在前一次试验中做出反应(执行试验),则会出现切换成本,但如果他们没有做出反应(不执行试验),则不会出现切换成本。当两个参与者联合执行任务时,如果该参与者在前一次试验中做出反应(参与者重复试验),则会出现切换成本,但如果共同参与者做出反应(参与者切换试验),则不会出现切换成本。在实验2中,一个参与者执行联合条件下的两个任务,以测试实验1的结果是否是由于两个参与者使用了不同的反应集。对于反应集的重复和交替都获得了切换成本,这排除了这种可能性。综上所述,我们的研究结果几乎没有支持参与者共同呈现其共同参与者的任务集这一观点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e833/5641279/f70e0a6f40b9/426_2016_813_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
No evidence for shared representations of task sets in joint task switching.
Psychol Res. 2017 Nov;81(6):1166-1177. doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0813-y. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
2
When two actors perform different tasks: Still no evidence for shared task-sets in joint task switching.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Nov;74(11):1914-1923. doi: 10.1177/17470218211031545. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
3
The roles of action selection and actor selection in joint task settings.
Cognition. 2019 Jan;182:184-192. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.10.010. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
4
Action-effect sharing induces task-set sharing in joint task switching.
Cognition. 2017 Aug;165:113-120. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.022. Epub 2017 May 20.
5
Switch-Independent Task Representations in Frontal and Parietal Cortex.
J Neurosci. 2017 Aug 16;37(33):8033-8042. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3656-16.2017. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
6
Sharing tasks or sharing actions? Evidence from the joint Simon task.
Psychol Res. 2018 Mar;82(2):385-394. doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0821-y. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
7
The joint flanker effect: sharing tasks with real and imagined co-actors.
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Jun;211(3-4):371-85. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2709-9. Epub 2011 May 15.
8
Evidence for a multicomponent hierarchical representation of dual tasks.
Mem Cognit. 2021 Feb;49(2):350-363. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01097-3. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
9
Dynamic Trial-by-Trial Recoding of Task-Set Representations in the Frontoparietal Cortex Mediates Behavioral Flexibility.
J Neurosci. 2017 Nov 8;37(45):11037-11050. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0935-17.2017. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
10
The joint flanker effect and the joint Simon effect: On the comparability of processes underlying joint compatibility effects.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Sep;70(9):1808-1823. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1207690. Epub 2016 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

1
The influence of advanced information on co-representation in a shared finger precuing task.
Exp Brain Res. 2025 Jul 2;243(7):183. doi: 10.1007/s00221-025-07128-2.
2
Number to me, space to you: Joint representation of spatial-numerical associations.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Apr;29(2):485-491. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-02013-9. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
3
When two actors perform different tasks: Still no evidence for shared task-sets in joint task switching.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Nov;74(11):1914-1923. doi: 10.1177/17470218211031545. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
4
Metacontrol and joint action: how shared goals transfer from one task to another?
Psychol Res. 2021 Oct;85(7):2769-2781. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01443-9. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
5
Incomplete information about the partner affects the development of collaborative strategies in joint action.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 Dec 12;15(12):e1006385. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006385. eCollection 2019 Dec.
6
Conditional automaticity: interference effects on the implicit memory retrieval process.
Psychol Res. 2021 Feb;85(1):223-237. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01228-9. Epub 2019 Jul 13.
7
Is Your Color My Color? Dividing the Labor of the Stroop Task Between Co-actors.
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 6;9:1407. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01407. eCollection 2018.
8
Joint cognition and the role of human agency in random number choices.
Psychol Res. 2019 Apr;83(3):574-589. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0944-9. Epub 2017 Nov 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Task-switch costs subsequent to cue-only trials.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Aug;70(8):1453-1470. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1188321. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
2
Mood migration: How enfacing a smile makes you happier.
Cognition. 2016 Jun;151:52-62. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.02.018. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
3
A role of goals for social inhibition of return?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016 Dec;69(12):2402-2418. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1112417.
4
Social task switching: On the automatic social engagement of executive functions.
Cognition. 2016 Jan;146:223-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.10.001. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
5
Exploring social influences on the joint Simon task: empathy and friendship.
Front Psychol. 2015 Jul 9;6:962. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00962. eCollection 2015.
6
Group membership and social status modulate joint actions.
Exp Brain Res. 2015 Aug;233(8):2461-6. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4316-7. Epub 2015 May 24.
7
The joint Simon effect: a review and theoretical integration.
Front Psychol. 2014 Sep 5;5:974. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00974. eCollection 2014.
8
Group membership affects spontaneous mental representation: failure to represent the out-group in a joint action task.
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 20;8(11):e79178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079178. eCollection 2013.
10
Action co-representation and social exclusion.
Exp Brain Res. 2013 May;227(1):85-92. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3487-3. Epub 2013 Mar 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验