• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在联合任务切换中,没有证据表明存在任务集的共享表征。

No evidence for shared representations of task sets in joint task switching.

作者信息

Yamaguchi Motonori, Wall Helen J, Hommel Bernhard

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Edge Hill University, St Helens Road, Ormskirk, Lancashire, L39 4QP, UK.

Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2017 Nov;81(6):1166-1177. doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0813-y. Epub 2016 Oct 15.

DOI:10.1007/s00426-016-0813-y
PMID:27744585
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5641279/
Abstract

It has been suggested that actors co-represent a shared task context when they perform a task in a joint fashion. The present study examined the possibility of co-representation in joint task switching, in which two actors shared two tasks that switched randomly across trials. Experiment 1 showed that when an actor performed the tasks individually, switch costs were obtained if the actors responded on the previous trial (go trial), but not if they did not respond (no-go trial). When two actors performed the tasks jointly, switch costs were obtained if the actor responded on the previous trial (actor-repeat trials) but not if the co-actor responded (actor-switch trials). In Experiment 2, a single actor performed both tasks of the joint condition to test whether the findings of Experiment 1 were due to the use of different response sets by the two actors. Switch costs were obtained for both repetitions and alternations of the response set, which rules out this possibility. Taken together, our findings provided little support for the idea that actors co-represent the task sets of their co-actors.

摘要

有人提出,当参与者以联合方式执行任务时,他们会共同呈现一个共享的任务情境。本研究考察了在联合任务切换中共同呈现的可能性,在联合任务切换中,两个参与者共享两个在不同试验中随机切换的任务。实验1表明,当一个参与者单独执行任务时,如果该参与者在前一次试验中做出反应(执行试验),则会出现切换成本,但如果他们没有做出反应(不执行试验),则不会出现切换成本。当两个参与者联合执行任务时,如果该参与者在前一次试验中做出反应(参与者重复试验),则会出现切换成本,但如果共同参与者做出反应(参与者切换试验),则不会出现切换成本。在实验2中,一个参与者执行联合条件下的两个任务,以测试实验1的结果是否是由于两个参与者使用了不同的反应集。对于反应集的重复和交替都获得了切换成本,这排除了这种可能性。综上所述,我们的研究结果几乎没有支持参与者共同呈现其共同参与者的任务集这一观点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e833/5641279/e9f76297c7fe/426_2016_813_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e833/5641279/f70e0a6f40b9/426_2016_813_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e833/5641279/e9f76297c7fe/426_2016_813_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e833/5641279/f70e0a6f40b9/426_2016_813_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e833/5641279/e9f76297c7fe/426_2016_813_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
No evidence for shared representations of task sets in joint task switching.在联合任务切换中,没有证据表明存在任务集的共享表征。
Psychol Res. 2017 Nov;81(6):1166-1177. doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0813-y. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
2
When two actors perform different tasks: Still no evidence for shared task-sets in joint task switching.当两个演员执行不同任务时:联合任务转换中仍没有共享任务集的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Nov;74(11):1914-1923. doi: 10.1177/17470218211031545. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
3
The roles of action selection and actor selection in joint task settings.在联合任务设置中,动作选择和执行者选择的作用。
Cognition. 2019 Jan;182:184-192. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.10.010. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
4
Action-effect sharing induces task-set sharing in joint task switching.动作-效应共享在联合任务切换中会引发任务集共享。
Cognition. 2017 Aug;165:113-120. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.022. Epub 2017 May 20.
5
Switch-Independent Task Representations in Frontal and Parietal Cortex.额叶和顶叶皮质中与开关无关的任务表征
J Neurosci. 2017 Aug 16;37(33):8033-8042. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3656-16.2017. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
6
Sharing tasks or sharing actions? Evidence from the joint Simon task.共享任务还是共享动作?来自联合西蒙任务的证据。
Psychol Res. 2018 Mar;82(2):385-394. doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0821-y. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
7
The joint flanker effect: sharing tasks with real and imagined co-actors.共同动作突显性:与真实和想象中的共同执行者共同完成任务。
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Jun;211(3-4):371-85. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2709-9. Epub 2011 May 15.
8
Evidence for a multicomponent hierarchical representation of dual tasks.多成分层次表示双任务的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2021 Feb;49(2):350-363. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01097-3. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
9
Dynamic Trial-by-Trial Recoding of Task-Set Representations in the Frontoparietal Cortex Mediates Behavioral Flexibility.额顶叶皮层中任务集表征的逐次动态编码介导行为灵活性。
J Neurosci. 2017 Nov 8;37(45):11037-11050. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0935-17.2017. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
10
The joint flanker effect and the joint Simon effect: On the comparability of processes underlying joint compatibility effects.联合侧翼效应与联合西蒙效应:关于联合兼容性效应背后过程的可比性
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Sep;70(9):1808-1823. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1207690. Epub 2016 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

1
The influence of advanced information on co-representation in a shared finger precuing task.先进信息对共享手指预提示任务中共同表征的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2025 Jul 2;243(7):183. doi: 10.1007/s00221-025-07128-2.
2
Number to me, space to you: Joint representation of spatial-numerical associations.数字对我,空格对你:空间-数字联合表示。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Apr;29(2):485-491. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-02013-9. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
3
When two actors perform different tasks: Still no evidence for shared task-sets in joint task switching.

本文引用的文献

1
Task-switch costs subsequent to cue-only trials.仅提示试验后的任务转换成本。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Aug;70(8):1453-1470. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1188321. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
2
Mood migration: How enfacing a smile makes you happier.情绪迁移:直面微笑如何让你更快乐。
Cognition. 2016 Jun;151:52-62. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.02.018. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
3
A role of goals for social inhibition of return?目标在社会性返回抑制中起作用吗?
当两个演员执行不同任务时:联合任务转换中仍没有共享任务集的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Nov;74(11):1914-1923. doi: 10.1177/17470218211031545. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
4
Metacontrol and joint action: how shared goals transfer from one task to another?元控制与联合行动:共享目标如何从一项任务转移到另一项任务?
Psychol Res. 2021 Oct;85(7):2769-2781. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01443-9. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
5
Incomplete information about the partner affects the development of collaborative strategies in joint action.关于伙伴的不完整信息会影响联合行动中协作策略的发展。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 Dec 12;15(12):e1006385. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006385. eCollection 2019 Dec.
6
Conditional automaticity: interference effects on the implicit memory retrieval process.条件自动性:内隐记忆提取过程中的干扰效应。
Psychol Res. 2021 Feb;85(1):223-237. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01228-9. Epub 2019 Jul 13.
7
Is Your Color My Color? Dividing the Labor of the Stroop Task Between Co-actors.你的颜色是我的颜色吗?共同行动者之间Stroop任务的分工
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 6;9:1407. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01407. eCollection 2018.
8
Joint cognition and the role of human agency in random number choices.联合认知以及人类能动性在随机数选择中的作用。
Psychol Res. 2019 Apr;83(3):574-589. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0944-9. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016 Dec;69(12):2402-2418. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1112417.
4
Social task switching: On the automatic social engagement of executive functions.社交任务转换:关于执行功能的自动社交参与
Cognition. 2016 Jan;146:223-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.10.001. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
5
Exploring social influences on the joint Simon task: empathy and friendship.探索社会因素对联合西蒙任务的影响:同理心与友谊
Front Psychol. 2015 Jul 9;6:962. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00962. eCollection 2015.
6
Group membership and social status modulate joint actions.
Exp Brain Res. 2015 Aug;233(8):2461-6. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4316-7. Epub 2015 May 24.
7
The joint Simon effect: a review and theoretical integration.联合西蒙效应:综述与理论整合。
Front Psychol. 2014 Sep 5;5:974. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00974. eCollection 2014.
8
Group membership affects spontaneous mental representation: failure to represent the out-group in a joint action task.群体成员身份会影响自发的心理表征:在联合行动任务中无法表征外群体。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 20;8(11):e79178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079178. eCollection 2013.
9
The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects.无关位置信息对表现的影响:西蒙和空间斯特鲁普效应综述。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1995 Jun;2(2):174-207. doi: 10.3758/BF03210959.
10
Action co-representation and social exclusion.动作共同表象与社会排斥。
Exp Brain Res. 2013 May;227(1):85-92. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3487-3. Epub 2013 Mar 30.