Challacombe Ben, Kavoussi Louis, Patriciu Alexandru, Stoianovici Dan, Dasgupta Prokar
Department of Urology, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.
Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2006 Nov;3(11):611-7. doi: 10.1038/ncpuro0626.
The rapid expansion of the field of minimally invasive surgery has been accompanied by a number of controversies. These novel surgical techniques offer benefits to the patient with regard to length of hospital stay, return to full activity, and cosmesis; also, they are often more cost-effective than open procedures. On the other hand, they are technically demanding, have a significant learning curve, and can be associated with high initial complication rates unless performed by experienced endoscopic surgeons. Telemedicine, which uses real-time video and information transfer, offers the potential to increase the availability of minimally invasive surgery through video-assisted surgery and through remote instruction. At present, remote communities, especially those within developed countries, can most immediately benefit from telesurgical approaches. Enthusiasm must be tempered by the issues of cost, security, surgeon liability and availability of the technology itself which have yet to be fully resolved. In this Review, the field of telemedicine, focusing specifically on telementoring and telesurgery, and its relevance to urology are discussed. From early experimental work to current clinical usage, the advantages of and problems in this evolving field are explored.
微创手术领域的迅速扩张伴随着诸多争议。这些新型手术技术在住院时间、恢复正常活动以及美容效果方面给患者带来了益处;此外,它们通常比开放手术更具成本效益。另一方面,它们对技术要求很高,有显著的学习曲线,并且除非由经验丰富的内镜外科医生实施,否则可能伴有较高的初始并发症发生率。远程医疗利用实时视频和信息传输,通过视频辅助手术和远程指导,为增加微创手术的可及性提供了可能。目前,偏远社区,尤其是发达国家境内的那些社区,能够最直接地从远程手术方法中受益。但对于成本、安全、外科医生责任以及技术本身的可及性等尚未完全解决的问题,必须保持谨慎态度。在本综述中,将讨论远程医疗领域,特别关注远程指导和远程手术及其与泌尿外科的相关性。从早期的实验工作到当前的临床应用,将探索这一不断发展领域的优势与问题。