Suppr超能文献

我们看待梦境的“方式”:来自单侧空间忽视的证据(兼对梦境怪诞性的一种进化论阐释)

The "ways" we look at dreams: evidence from unilateral spatial neglect (with an evolutionary account of dream bizarreness).

作者信息

Doricchi Fabrizio, Iaria Giuseppe, Silvetti Massimo, Figliozzi Francesca, Siegler Isabelle

机构信息

LENA (Laboratoire Europeen des Neurosciences de l'Action), Centro Ricerche di Neuropsicologia Fondazione Santa Lucia, Fondazione Santa Lucia IRCCS, Via Ardeatina 306, Rome, 00179, Italy.

出版信息

Exp Brain Res. 2007 Apr;178(4):450-61. doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0750-x. Epub 2006 Nov 8.

Abstract

Despite decades of research, the question of whether the rapid eye movements (REMs) of paradoxical sleep (PS) are equivalent to waking saccades and whether their direction is congruent with visual spatial events in the dream scene is still very controversial. We gained an insight into these questions through the study of a right brain damaged patient suffering attentional neglect for the left side of space and drop of the optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) with alternating rightward slow/leftward fast phases evoked by rightward optic flow. During PS the patient had frequent Nystagmoid REMs with alternating leftward slow/rightward fast phases and reported dreams with visual events evoking corresponding OKN such as a train running leftward. By contrast, just as in waking OKN, Nystagmoid REMs with alternating rightward slow/leftward fast phases were virtually absent. REMs followed by staring eye position or by consecutive REMs were also observed: these showed no asymmetry comparable to that of Nystagmoid ones. The selective disappearance of Nystagmoid REMs in one horizontal direction proves, for the first time, that in humans different types of REMs exists and that these are driven by different premotor mechanisms. Concomitant drop of OKN and Nystagmoid REMs toward the same horizontal direction demonstrates that phylogenetically ancient oculomotor mechanisms, such as the OKN, are shared by waking and PS. On this evidence and converging findings from animal, neuropsychological and brain imaging studies, a new evolutionary account of dream bizarreness is proposed. Classification and labelling of the different types of REMs are also provided.

摘要

尽管经过了数十年的研究,但关于异相睡眠(PS)中的快速眼动(REM)是否等同于清醒时的扫视以及其方向是否与梦境场景中的视觉空间事件一致的问题,仍然存在很大争议。我们通过对一名右脑损伤患者的研究,深入了解了这些问题。该患者存在对空间左侧的注意力忽视,并且在向右视流诱发的交替向右慢相/向左快相的视动性眼震(OKN)中出现了眼震减弱。在PS期间,该患者频繁出现具有交替向左慢相/向右快相的眼震样快速眼动,并报告了包含诱发相应OKN的视觉事件的梦境,比如一列向左行驶的火车。相比之下,就像在清醒时的OKN中一样,几乎不存在具有交替向右慢相/向左快相的眼震样快速眼动。还观察到了以凝视眼位或连续快速眼动结束的快速眼动:这些快速眼动没有表现出与眼震样快速眼动相当的不对称性。在一个水平方向上眼震样快速眼动的选择性消失首次证明,在人类中存在不同类型的快速眼动,并且这些快速眼动由不同的运动前机制驱动。OKN和眼震样快速眼动向同一水平方向的同时减弱表明,在系统发育上古老的眼球运动机制,如OKN,在清醒和PS中是共有的。基于这一证据以及来自动物、神经心理学和脑成像研究的趋同发现,提出了一种关于梦境怪诞性 的新的进化解释。还提供了不同类型快速眼动的分类和标记。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验