Zheng Yu, Zhou Hong, Brennan Karen, Blair Julie M, Modzelewski James R K, Seibel Markus J, Dunstan Colin R
Bone Research Program, ANZAC Research Institute, Hospital Road, Concord NSW 2139, Australia.
Bone. 2007 Feb;40(2):471-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2006.09.016. Epub 2006 Nov 7.
Inhibition of bone resorption either by bisphosphonate (BP) treatment or by blocking RANKL signalling with osteoprotegerin (OPG) has been shown to reduce tumour burden in bone and inhibit bone destruction in murine xenograft models of breast cancer. However, whether the anti-tumour effect of OPG or BP in bone is mediated by inhibition of bone resorption or by direct effects on tumour cells is uncertain. The current study is designed to investigate anti-tumour effects of OPG and ibandronate (IBN), dosed alone or in combination, on tumour growth to determine if there is experimental support for combination treatments and to provide evidence for the presence of direct anti-tumour effects. To this aim, 10 microl (5 x 10(6) cells/ml) of the bone-seeking MDA-MB-231 (Tx-SA) cell line was injected intra-tibially into nude mice. After 10 days, when the tumours were evident radiologically, mice were treated with vehicle, OPG (1 mg/kg/day), ibandronate (IBN) (160 microg/kg/day) or IBN and OPG at the same doses (IBN+OPG) for a week, and the effects of each treatment on lytic lesions, tumour cell growth, cell apoptosis and proliferation were measured by radiography, immunohistochemistry and histomorphometry. Compared to vehicle controls, in vivo treatment with OPG, IBN, or IBN+OPG, each prevented the expansion of osteolytic bone lesions (increase in lytic lesion area day 10 to day 17: OPG -3.2%, IBN 6.6%, IBN+OPG 3.6%, Vehicle 232.5%; p<0.01). Treatment with OPG, IBN or IBN+OPG each produced similar reductions in tumour area relative to vehicle-treated mice (OPG 52%, IBN 54%, IBNp and OPG 48%, p<0.01 vs. vehicle) OPG and IBN alone and in combination each produced a similar increase in cancer cell apoptosis (OPG 330%, IBN 342%, IBN and OPG 347%, p<0.01 vs. vehicle) and a decrease in cancer cell proliferation (OPG 59%, IBN 62%, IBN and OPG 58%, p<0.05 vs. vehicle). Our findings indicate that (i) combined treatment with OPG and a bisphosphonate is not significantly more effective than either agent alone; and that (ii) inhibition of bone resorption, rather than direct anti-tumour action, mediates the effects of these agents on tumour growth in this in vivo model.
在乳腺癌小鼠异种移植模型中,双膦酸盐(BP)治疗或用骨保护素(OPG)阻断RANKL信号传导抑制骨吸收,已显示可减轻骨肿瘤负担并抑制骨破坏。然而,OPG或BP在骨中的抗肿瘤作用是通过抑制骨吸收介导还是对肿瘤细胞的直接作用介导尚不确定。本研究旨在研究单独或联合给药的OPG和伊班膦酸钠(IBN)对肿瘤生长的抗肿瘤作用,以确定联合治疗是否有实验依据,并为直接抗肿瘤作用的存在提供证据。为此,将10微升(5×10⁶细胞/毫升)亲骨性MDA-MB-231(Tx-SA)细胞系经胫骨内注射到裸鼠体内。10天后,当放射学上明显可见肿瘤时,小鼠接受载体、OPG(1毫克/千克/天)、伊班膦酸钠(IBN)(160微克/千克/天)或相同剂量的IBN和OPG(IBN + OPG)治疗一周,并通过放射照相、免疫组织化学和组织形态计量学测量每种治疗对溶骨性病变、肿瘤细胞生长、细胞凋亡和增殖的影响。与载体对照相比,用OPG、IBN或IBN + OPG进行体内治疗均可防止溶骨性骨病变的扩大(溶骨性病变面积从第10天到第17天的增加:OPG -3.2%,IBN 6.6%,IBN + OPG 3.6%,载体232.5%;p<0.01)。与载体治疗的小鼠相比,用OPG、IBN或IBN + OPG治疗均使肿瘤面积有类似程度的减小(OPG 52%,IBN 54%,IBN和OPG 48%,与载体相比p<0.01)。单独及联合使用的OPG和IBN均使癌细胞凋亡有类似程度的增加(OPG 330%,IBN 342%,IBN和OPG 347%,与载体相比p<0.01),并使癌细胞增殖减少(OPG 59%,IBN 62%,IBN和OPG 58%,与载体相比p<0.05)。我们的研究结果表明:(i)OPG和双膦酸盐联合治疗并不比单独使用任何一种药物更有效;以及(ii)在该体内模型中,抑制骨吸收而非直接抗肿瘤作用介导了这些药物对肿瘤生长的影响。