Suppr超能文献

生长抑素类似物与地塞米松联合唑来膦酸对比唑来膦酸治疗雄激素剥夺难治性前列腺癌患者的随机对照临床试验

Randomized controlled clinical trial of a combination of somatostatin analog and dexamethasone plus zoledronate vs. zoledronate in patients with androgen ablation-refractory prostate cancer.

作者信息

Mitsiades Constantine S, Bogdanos John, Karamanolakis Dimitrios, Milathianakis Constantine, Dimopoulos Theodoros, Koutsilieris Michael

机构信息

Department of Experimental Physiology, Medical School, University of Athens, Goudi-Athens, Attiki 115 27, Greece.

出版信息

Anticancer Res. 2006 Sep-Oct;26(5B):3693-700.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

As previously shown, the combination of standard androgen ablation therapy with somatostatin analog and dexamethasone in metastatic androgen ablation-refractory (stage D3) prostate cancer (PrCa) patients has a favorable profile of side-effects, durable objective antitumor activity (up to 60% partial response rate) and palliative effects. Bisphosphonates interfere with bone remodeling at the sites of PrCa bone metastases and have been postulated to have indirect and/or direct anti-PrCa activity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted to compare a combination of somatostatin analog (octreotide 20 mg i.m. every 28 days) and oral dexamethasone (4 mg daily for 1 month, gradually reduced to 1 mg daily by the fourth month, with a 1 mg daily maintenance dose thereafter) plus zoledronate (4 mg i.v. every 4 weeks) vs. zoledronate only. All patients in both arms remained in basic androgen blockade throughout the study.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight stage D3 patients (mean age 72.8 +/- 6.8 years) were randomized to either treatment arm of the study. The trial was stopped after a pre-specified interim analysis met the criteria for early closure, i.e. significant difference in outcomes between the two treatment arms. Partial responses (PR, > or =50% PSA decline) were observed in 13 out of 20 patients with combination therapy vs. none with zoledronate. The combination therapy arm had significantly better outcome with respect to median progression-free survival (7.0 vs. 1.0 months, p < 0.0001), median overall survival (OS) (12.0 vs. 9.0 months, p = 0.0027), median PrCa-specific OS (defined as time from onset of therapy until PrCa-related death) (16 vs. 9.0 months, p = 0.0005) and median duration of bone pain improvement (>14 vs. 4 months p = 0.00001 by log-rank tests).

CONCLUSION

For androgen ablation-refractory metastatic PrCa patients under androgen ablation, the combination of dexamethasone, somatostatin analog and zoledronate offered superior objective and palliative clinical responses than zoledronate alone.

摘要

背景

如先前所示,在转移性雄激素剥夺难治性(D3期)前列腺癌(PrCa)患者中,标准雄激素剥夺疗法与生长抑素类似物及地塞米松联合使用,具有良好的副作用特征、持久的客观抗肿瘤活性(部分缓解率高达60%)及姑息效果。双膦酸盐可干扰PrCa骨转移部位的骨重塑,并且据推测具有间接和/或直接的抗PrCa活性。

材料与方法

进行了一项随机对照临床试验,以比较生长抑素类似物(奥曲肽20mg,每28天肌肉注射一次)与口服地塞米松(每日4mg,持续1个月,至第4个月逐渐减至每日1mg,此后维持每日1mg剂量)加唑来膦酸(每4周静脉注射4mg)与仅使用唑来膦酸的疗效。在整个研究过程中,两组的所有患者均维持基本的雄激素阻断治疗。

结果

38例D3期患者(平均年龄72.8±6.8岁)被随机分配至该研究的任一治疗组。在一项预先设定的中期分析达到提前终止标准(即两个治疗组的结果存在显著差异)后,该试验停止。联合治疗组的20例患者中有13例观察到部分缓解(PR,PSA下降≥50%),而唑来膦酸组无患者出现部分缓解。联合治疗组在无进展生存期(7.0个月对1.0个月,p<0.0001)、总生存期(OS)(12.0个月对9.0个月,p=0.0027)、PrCa特异性OS(定义为从治疗开始至PrCa相关死亡的时间)(16个月对9.0个月,p=0.0005)以及骨痛改善持续时间(对数秩检验显示>14个月对4个月p=0.00001)方面的结果均显著更好。

结论

对于接受雄激素剥夺治疗的雄激素剥夺难治性转移性PrCa患者,地塞米松、生长抑素类似物与唑来膦酸联合使用比单独使用唑来膦酸能提供更优的客观和姑息性临床反应。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验