发育障碍和视力障碍儿童的强化物评估
Reinforcer assessment for children with developmental disabilities and visual impairments.
作者信息
Paclawskyj T R, Vollmer T R
机构信息
Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge 70803, USA.
出版信息
J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Summer;28(2):219-24. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-219.
Abstract
We assessed the applicability of two previously developed reinforcer assessment procedures to children with developmental disabilities and visual impairments. Greater differentiation between stimuli was observed with a choice procedure than with a preference procedure. Measurement of compliance and rate of responding in adaptive skill training confirmed that the choice procedure accurately identified reinforcing stimuli. The preference procedure produced false positive predictions of reinforcer efficacy.
摘要
我们评估了两种先前开发的强化物评估程序对发育障碍和视力障碍儿童的适用性。与偏好程序相比，选择程序观察到刺激之间的差异更大。在适应性技能训练中对依从性和反应率的测量证实，选择程序准确地识别了强化刺激。偏好程序对强化物效果产生了假阳性预测。
相似文献
1
Reinforcer assessment for children with developmental disabilities and visual impairments.发育障碍和视力障碍儿童的强化物评估
J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Summer;28(2):219-24. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-219.
2
Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment.一项简短刺激偏好评估的评价
J Appl Behav Anal. 1998 Winter;31(4):605-20. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-605.
3
Comparing preference assessments: selection- versus duration-based preference assessment procedures.比较偏好评估：基于选择与基于持续时间的偏好评估程序
Res Dev Disabil. 2009 Sep-Oct;30(5):1068-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2009.02.010. Epub 2009 Mar 26.
4
An evaluation of a stimulus preference assessment of auditory stimuli for adolescents with developmental disabilities.对发育障碍青少年听觉刺激的刺激偏好评估
Res Dev Disabil. 2008 Jan-Feb;29(1):11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2006.09.003. Epub 2006 Nov 9.
5
Comparison of verbal preference assessments in the presence and absence of the actual stimuli.实际刺激存在与不存在时言语偏好评估的比较。
Res Dev Disabil. 2006 Nov-Dec;27(6):645-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2005.08.001. Epub 2005 Nov 2.
6
An evaluation of the use of eye gaze to measure preference of individuals with severe physical and developmental disabilities.一项关于使用目光注视来测量重度身体和发育残疾个体偏好的评估。
Dev Neurorehabil. 2010;13(4):266-75. doi: 10.3109/17518421003705706.
7
Evaluating the predictive validity of a single stimulus engagement preference assessment.评估单一刺激参与偏好评估的预测效度。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2001 Winter;34(4):475-85. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-475.
8
Examination of ambiguous stimulus preferences with duration-based measures.使用基于持续时间的测量方法对模糊刺激偏好进行检查。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1999 Spring;32(1):111-4. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-111.
9
Adaptive behavior of children and adolescents with visual impairments.视障儿童和青少年的适应行为。
Res Dev Disabil. 2011 May-Jun;32(3):1086-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.01.021. Epub 2011 Feb 12.
10
Pre-assessment exposure to schedule-correlated stimuli affects choice responding for tasks.预先评估与时间表相关的刺激会影响任务的选择反应。
Res Dev Disabil. 2011 Mar-Apr;32(2):527-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2010.12.029. Epub 2011 Jan 12.
引用本文的文献
1
Stimulus Preference Assessment Decision-Making System (SPADS): A Decision-Making Model for Practitioners.刺激偏好评估决策系统（SPADS）：从业者的决策模型
Behav Anal Pract. 2021 Apr 30;14(4):1144-1156. doi: 10.1007/s40617-020-00539-3. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
Stability of infants' preference for prosocial others: Implications for research based on single-choice paradigms.婴儿对亲社会他人偏好的稳定性：对基于单项选择范式研究的启示。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 2;12(6):e0178818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178818. eCollection 2017.
3
Toilet training children with autism and developmental delays: an effective program for school settings.对患有自闭症和发育迟缓的儿童进行如厕训练：一种适用于学校环境的有效方案。
Behav Anal Pract. 2012 Winter;5(2):60-4. doi: 10.1007/BF03391824.
4
The Role of Context in the Evaluation of Reinforcer Efficacy: Implications for the Preference Assessment Outcomes.情境在强化物效能评估中的作用：对偏好评估结果的启示
Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2012 Jan;6(1):158-167. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2011.04.001.
5
An evaluation of resurgence during treatment with functional communication training.功能性沟通训练治疗期间的复发评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2009 Spring;42(1):145-60. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2009.42-145.
6
The effects of reinforcement magnitude on functional analysis outcomes.强化幅度对功能分析结果的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2005 Summer;38(2):147-62. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2005.111-04.
7
Progressing from programmatic to discovery research: a case example with the overjustification effect.从程序性研究到探索性研究的进展：过度合理化效应的一个案例
J Appl Behav Anal. 2003 Spring;36(1):35-46. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2003.36-35.
8
Functional analysis and treatment of problem behavior evoked by noise.噪音诱发问题行为的功能分析与治疗
J Appl Behav Anal. 2001 Winter;34(4):447-62. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-447.
9
Functional analysis and treatment of self-injury associated with transitions.与转变相关的自我伤害的功能分析与治疗
J Appl Behav Anal. 2001 Summer;34(2):195-210. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-195.
10
Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment.一项简短刺激偏好评估的评价
J Appl Behav Anal. 1998 Winter;31(4):605-20. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-605.
本文引用的文献
1
Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals.对重度智力迟钝个体的刺激偏好和强化物价值的评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Fall;18(3):249-55. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-249.
2
Establishing operations and reinforcement effects.建立操作与强化效果。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1991 Summer;24(2):279-91. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1991.24-279.
3
A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.两种为重度和极重度残疾人士识别强化物方法的比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Summer;25(2):491-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-491.
Zotero 插件