Paclawskyj T R, Vollmer T R
Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge 70803, USA.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Summer;28(2):219-24. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-219.
We assessed the applicability of two previously developed reinforcer assessment procedures to children with developmental disabilities and visual impairments. Greater differentiation between stimuli was observed with a choice procedure than with a preference procedure. Measurement of compliance and rate of responding in adaptive skill training confirmed that the choice procedure accurately identified reinforcing stimuli. The preference procedure produced false positive predictions of reinforcer efficacy.
我们评估了两种先前开发的强化物评估程序对发育障碍和视力障碍儿童的适用性。与偏好程序相比，选择程序观察到刺激之间的差异更大。在适应性技能训练中对依从性和反应率的测量证实，选择程序准确地识别了强化刺激。偏好程序对强化物效果产生了假阳性预测。
