Suppr超能文献

一项简短刺激偏好评估的评价

Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment.

作者信息

Roane H S, Vollmer T R, Ringdahl J E, Marcus B A

机构信息

Louisiana State University, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Behav Anal. 1998 Winter;31(4):605-20. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-605.

Abstract

We evaluated the utility of a brief (5-min) stimulus preference assessment for individuals with developmental disabilities. Participants had noncontingent (free) access to an array of stimuli and could interact with any of the stimuli at any time. Stimuli were never withdrawn or withheld from the participants during a 5-min session. In Experiment 1, the brief preference assessment was conducted for 10 participants to identify differentially preferred stimuli, and reinforcer assessments were conducted to test the reinforcing efficacy of those stimuli identified as highly preferred. In Experiment 2, a comparison was conducted between the brief preference assessment and a commonly used paired-stimulus preference assessment. Collectively, results demonstrated that the brief preference assessment identified stimuli that functioned as reinforcers for a simple operant response, identified preferred stimuli that were differentially effective as reinforcers compared to nonpreferred stimuli, was associated with fewer problem behaviors, and required less time to complete than a commonly used paired-stimulus preference assessment.

摘要

我们评估了一种简短(5分钟)的刺激偏好评估对发育障碍个体的实用性。参与者可以无限制地(自由)接触一系列刺激,并可在任何时间与任何刺激进行互动。在5分钟的时间段内,刺激从未从参与者那里撤回或扣留。在实验1中,对10名参与者进行了简短的偏好评估,以识别差异偏好的刺激,并进行强化物评估,以测试那些被确定为高度偏好的刺激的强化效果。在实验2中,对简短偏好评估和常用的配对刺激偏好评估进行了比较。总体而言,结果表明,简短偏好评估识别出了对简单操作性反应起强化作用的刺激,识别出了与非偏好刺激相比作为强化物更具差异有效性的偏好刺激,与较少的问题行为相关,并且比常用的配对刺激偏好评估所需的完成时间更少。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment.一项简短刺激偏好评估的评价
J Appl Behav Anal. 1998 Winter;31(4):605-20. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-605.

引用本文的文献

6
Teaching an Infant to Request Help.教婴儿请求帮助。
Anal Verbal Behav. 2023 Dec 8;40(1):53-62. doi: 10.1007/s40616-023-00198-9. eCollection 2024 Jun.
9
A replication and extension of the augmented competing stimulus assessment.增强竞争刺激评估的复制与扩展
J Appl Behav Anal. 2023;56(4):869-883. doi: 10.1002/jaba.1009. Epub 2023 Jul 18.

本文引用的文献

8
Preference testing: a comparison of two presentation methods.偏好测试:两种展示方法的比较
Res Dev Disabil. 1994 Nov-Dec;15(6):439-55. doi: 10.1016/0891-4222(94)90028-0.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验