• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于使用目光注视来测量重度身体和发育残疾个体偏好的评估。

An evaluation of the use of eye gaze to measure preference of individuals with severe physical and developmental disabilities.

作者信息

Fleming Courtney V, Wheeler Geoffrey M, Cannella-Malone Helen I, Basbagill Abby R, Chung Yi-Chieh, Day Kristall Graham

机构信息

The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Dev Neurorehabil. 2010;13(4):266-75. doi: 10.3109/17518421003705706.

DOI:10.3109/17518421003705706
PMID:20629593
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine whether duration of eye gaze could be used to identify reinforcing stimuli for four individuals with severe physical and developmental disabilities, as well as the effectiveness of the assessment using different numbers of stimuli (i.e. 6 vs 14).

METHODS

This study measured each student's preferences in a paired stimulus preference assessment using duration of eye gaze toward various stimuli. Following the preference assessment, a reinforcer assessment was conducted within a reversal design to determine the accuracy of the preference hierarchy.

RESULTS

Results indicated that duration of eye gaze toward a stimulus was successful in identifying preferred stimuli that functioned as reinforcers for all participants. Additionally, the shorter preference assessment produced measures of similar accuracy in considerably less time.

CONCLUSION

Eye gaze can be used to identify reinforcing stimuli for individuals with severe physical and developmental disabilities.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨注视时长是否可用于识别四名重度身体和发育残疾个体的强化刺激,以及使用不同数量刺激(即6个与14个)进行评估的有效性。

方法

本研究在配对刺激偏好评估中,通过对各种刺激的注视时长来测量每个学生的偏好。在偏好评估之后,采用反转设计进行强化物评估,以确定偏好等级的准确性。

结果

结果表明,对刺激的注视时长成功识别出了对所有参与者都起强化作用的偏好刺激。此外,较短的偏好评估在更短的时间内产生了准确性相似的测量结果。

结论

注视可用于识别重度身体和发育残疾个体的强化刺激。

相似文献

1
An evaluation of the use of eye gaze to measure preference of individuals with severe physical and developmental disabilities.一项关于使用目光注视来测量重度身体和发育残疾个体偏好的评估。
Dev Neurorehabil. 2010;13(4):266-75. doi: 10.3109/17518421003705706.
2
Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment.一项简短刺激偏好评估的评价
J Appl Behav Anal. 1998 Winter;31(4):605-20. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-605.
3
Evaluating the predictive validity of a single stimulus engagement preference assessment.评估单一刺激参与偏好评估的预测效度。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2001 Winter;34(4):475-85. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-475.
4
Using eye gaze to identify reinforcers for individuals with severe multiple disabilities.利用目光注视为重度多重残疾个体识别强化物。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2015 Sep;48(3):680-4. doi: 10.1002/jaba.231. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
5
Comparing preference assessments: selection- versus duration-based preference assessment procedures.比较偏好评估:基于选择与基于持续时间的偏好评估程序
Res Dev Disabil. 2009 Sep-Oct;30(5):1068-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2009.02.010. Epub 2009 Mar 26.
6
Increasing the efficiency of paired-stimulus preference assessments by identifying categories of preference.通过识别偏好类别提高配对刺激偏好评估的效率。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2015 Spring;48(1):221-6. doi: 10.1002/jaba.190.
7
An evaluation of a stimulus preference assessment of auditory stimuli for adolescents with developmental disabilities.对发育障碍青少年听觉刺激的刺激偏好评估
Res Dev Disabil. 2008 Jan-Feb;29(1):11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2006.09.003. Epub 2006 Nov 9.
8
Examination of ambiguous stimulus preferences with duration-based measures.使用基于持续时间的测量方法对模糊刺激偏好进行检查。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1999 Spring;32(1):111-4. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-111.
9
Integrating caregiver report with systematic choice assessment to enhance reinforcer identification.整合照顾者报告与系统的选择评估以加强强化物识别。
Am J Ment Retard. 1996 Jul;101(1):15-25.
10
Preference assessment procedures for individuals with developmental disabilities.发育障碍个体的偏好评估程序。
Behav Modif. 2004 Sep;28(5):668-77. doi: 10.1177/0145445503259836.

引用本文的文献

1
Stimulus Preference Assessment Decision-Making System (SPADS): A Decision-Making Model for Practitioners.刺激偏好评估决策系统(SPADS):从业者的决策模型
Behav Anal Pract. 2021 Apr 30;14(4):1144-1156. doi: 10.1007/s40617-020-00539-3. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
Baby schema in human and animal faces induces cuteness perception and gaze allocation in children.人类和动物面孔中的婴儿图式会引起儿童的可爱感知和注视分配。
Front Psychol. 2014 May 7;5:411. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00411. eCollection 2014.
3
Single-case experimental designs: a systematic review of published research and current standards.
单病例实验设计:已发表研究和现行标准的系统评价。
Psychol Methods. 2012 Dec;17(4):510-50. doi: 10.1037/a0029312. Epub 2012 Jul 30.