Picker Susanne M, Radojska Stela M, Gathof Birgit S
Transfusion Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpenerstr. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
Transfus Apher Sci. 2006 Dec;35(3):197-205. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2006.08.004. Epub 2006 Nov 9.
Automated component collection systems offer the possibility of increasing blood supply and improving transfusion safety.
30 blood donors were randomly assigned to double RBC collection with either the Baxter Alyx (AX), the Haemonetics MCS Plus (MCS+), or the Gambro Trima Accel (TA). Procedures were prospectively evaluated focussing on yield, time, efficiency, citrate donor load, and in vitro quality.
All units showed sufficient in vitro quality throughout 42 days of storage and complied with international requirements. Donor reactions were limited to mild citrate reactions. AX was the fastest and most efficient system* * (* p approximately 0.001) attaining the highest yield * from similar amounts of whole blood. The drawbacks were a higher RBC loss* (p < 0.05) and accelerated citrate infusion . Due to lower collection rates * * (* * p < 0.001), MCS+ was slower than TA * * but compensated with lower citrate load * * *.
Double RBC apheresis was performed safely and efficiently with all three instruments. AX had advantages for most parameters evaluated.
自动化成分采集系统为增加血液供应和提高输血安全性提供了可能。
30名献血者被随机分配,使用百特Alyx(AX)、血液技术公司MCS Plus(MCS+)或甘布罗Trima Accel(TA)进行双红细胞采集。前瞻性评估了操作过程,重点关注采集量、时间、效率、枸橼酸盐供体负荷和体外质量。
所有单位在42天的储存期内均显示出足够的体外质量,并符合国际要求。供体反应仅限于轻度枸橼酸盐反应。AX是最快且最有效的系统(p约为0.001),从等量全血中获得的采集量最高。缺点是红细胞损失较高(p < 0.05)和枸橼酸盐输注加速。由于采集率较低(p < 0.001),MCS+比TA慢,但枸橼酸盐负荷较低。
使用这三种仪器均能安全、有效地进行双红细胞单采。AX在大多数评估参数方面具有优势。