Suppr超能文献

使用单相动作电位评估人类心房颤动周期长度的波动情况。

Evaluating fluctuations in human atrial fibrillatory cycle length using monophasic action potentials.

作者信息

Narayan Sanjiv M, Krummen David E, Kahn Andrew M, Karasik Pamela L, Franz Michael R

机构信息

Electrophysiology Service, University of California and Veterans Affairs Medical Centers, San Diego, California 92161, USA.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006 Nov;29(11):1209-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2006.00525.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study fluctuations in intracardiac atrial fibrillation (AF) cycle length (CL).

BACKGROUND

Sites of short AF CL may be good ablation targets, and cycle lengthening predicts ablation success. However, the optimum method for measuring AF CL, and its stability, are unclear. We hypothesized that autocorrelation better estimates AF CL than spectral dominant frequency (DF), which is susceptible to double counting, using monophasic action potentials (MAPs) to separate atrial activation from artifact.

METHODS

In 28 patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF, we analyzed 49 AF epochs using MAPs at the high (HRA) and low (LRA) right atrium. We estimated AF CL over 2 seconds, 10 seconds, and 2 minutes using spectral DF and autocorrelation in MAPs and filtered bipoles.

RESULTS

In the HRA, manually measured CL was 167 +/- 25 ms. Spectral DF poorly estimated AF CL in bipolar signals (R = 0.31; P = NS), due to double counting, but accurately estimated MAP CL (R = 0.73, P < 0.001). Autocorrelation estimated MAP (R = 0.92; P < 0.001) and bipolar (R = 0.83; P < 0.001) CL, with lower errors than spectral DF (P < 0.0001). Over time, changes in DF consistently preceded reciprocal changes in organization (P < 0.001). Finally, excluding inaccurate spectra, DF and AF organization differed between HRA and LRA over 2 seconds, but correlated over 10 seconds and 2 minutes (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

AF CL is better estimated by autocorrelation than spectral DF, particularly for bipoles, and stable when measured for >10 seconds. Notably, changes in AF CL preceded reciprocal changes in organization, yet changes in organization did not precede changes in AF CL. These results may help to interpret AF CL fluctuations.

摘要

目的

研究心内房颤(AF)周期长度(CL)的波动情况。

背景

房颤CL较短的部位可能是良好的消融靶点,且周期延长预示消融成功。然而,测量房颤CL的最佳方法及其稳定性尚不清楚。我们假设,与易受重复计数影响的频谱主导频率(DF)相比,自相关能更好地估计房颤CL,利用单相动作电位(MAPs)将心房激动与伪迹区分开来。

方法

在28例阵发性或持续性房颤患者中,我们使用右心房高位(HRA)和低位(LRA)的MAPs分析了49个房颤时段。我们使用频谱DF和MAPs及滤波后的双极导联中的自相关,估计2秒、10秒和2分钟内的房颤CL。

结果

在HRA中,手动测量的CL为167±25毫秒。由于重复计数,频谱DF在双极信号中对房颤CL的估计较差(R = 0.31;P = 无显著差异),但能准确估计MAP CL(R = 0.73,P < 0.001)。自相关估计MAP(R = 0.92;P < 0.001)和双极导联(R = 0.83;P < 0.001)的CL,误差低于频谱DF(P < 0.0001)。随着时间推移,DF的变化始终先于组织的反向变化(P < 0.001)。最后,排除不准确的频谱后,HRA和LRA之间在2秒内DF和房颤组织不同,但在10秒和2分钟时相关(P < 0.05)。

结论

与频谱DF相比,自相关能更好地估计房颤CL,尤其是对于双极导联,且在测量超过10秒时稳定。值得注意的是,房颤CL的变化先于组织的反向变化,而组织的变化并不先于房颤CL的变化。这些结果可能有助于解释房颤CL的波动情况。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验