Stojanowski Christopher M, Schillaci Michael A
Center for Bioarchaeological Research, School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2006;Suppl 43:49-88. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.20517.
This paper reviews studies of phenotypic inheritance and microevolutionary processes in archaeological populations using data on cranial and dental phenotypic variation, often referred to as paleogenetics or biodistance analysis. The estimation of biological distances between populations, or among individuals within populations, is one component of bioarchaeological research on past populations. In this overview, five approaches that focus on morphological variation within cemeteries are summarized: kinship and cemetery structure analysis, postmarital residence analysis, sample aggregate phenotypic variability, temporal microchronology, and age-structured phenotypic variation. Previous research, theoretical justifications, and methods are outlined for each topic. Case studies are presented that illustrate these theoretical and methodological bases, as well as demonstrate the kinds of inferences possible using these approaches. Kinship and cemetery structure analysis seeks to identify the members of family groups within larger cemeteries or determine whether cemeteries were kin-structured. Analysis of sex-specific phenotypic variation allows estimation of postmarital residence practices, which is important for understanding other aspects of prehistoric social organization. Analysis of aggregate phenotypic variability can be used to infer site formation processes or cemetery catchment area. The study of temporal microchronologies can be used to evaluate provisional archaeological chronologies or study microevolutionary processes such as adaptive selection or changing patterns of gene flow. Finally, age-structured phenotypic variation can be reflective of selection processes within populations or it can be used as a measure of morbidity, growth arrest, and early mortality within past populations. Use of phenotypic data as a genotypic proxy is theoretically sound, even at small scales of analysis.
本文回顾了利用颅骨和牙齿表型变异数据对考古人群的表型遗传和微进化过程进行的研究,这些研究通常被称为古遗传学或生物距离分析。估计人群之间或人群内个体之间的生物学距离,是对过去人群进行生物考古研究的一个组成部分。在本综述中,总结了五种关注墓地内形态变异的方法:亲属关系和墓地结构分析、婚后居住分析、样本总体表型变异性、时间微年代学以及年龄结构表型变异。针对每个主题概述了先前的研究、理论依据和方法。文中呈现了案例研究,以说明这些理论和方法基础,并展示使用这些方法可能得出的推论类型。亲属关系和墓地结构分析旨在识别较大墓地内的家族成员群体,或确定墓地是否按亲属关系构建。对性别特异性表型变异的分析有助于估计婚后居住模式,这对于理解史前社会组织的其他方面很重要。对总体表型变异性的分析可用于推断遗址形成过程或墓地集水区。时间微年代学研究可用于评估临时考古年代学,或研究微进化过程,如适应性选择或基因流动模式的变化。最后,年龄结构表型变异可以反映人群内部的选择过程,或者可以用作衡量过去人群中发病率、生长停滞和早期死亡率的指标。从理论上讲,即使在小规模分析中,将表型数据用作基因型代理也是合理的。