Ozar David T
Department of Philosophy, Loyola University Chicago, 6525 North Sheridan Road, Chicago, IL 60626, USA.
J Dent Educ. 2006 Nov;70(11):1139-45.
There are two very different ways of understanding access and care that are at work in contemporary American society. One of these is the understanding that our society's health professions have about access and care as they consider their ethical commitment to respond to patients' oral health needs. The other is how these matters are understood within America's public culture. In this view, needs--including health care needs--are no different in kind or ethical significance from unmet desires of any sort. This article will spell out the differences between these two ways of understanding care and access. Comprehending the distance that separates the health professions' perspective from much of mainstream American thinking on these matters is essential to a careful discussion of the ethics of access to oral health care.
在当代美国社会,存在两种截然不同的理解医疗服务可及性和医疗护理的方式。其中一种是,我们社会中的医疗行业在考虑其应对患者口腔健康需求的道德承诺时,对医疗服务可及性和医疗护理的理解。另一种是在美国公共文化中对这些问题的理解。从这个角度来看,需求——包括医疗保健需求——在种类或道德意义上与任何未得到满足的欲望并无不同。本文将阐述这两种理解医疗护理和医疗服务可及性方式之间的差异。理解医疗行业的观点与美国主流思想在这些问题上的巨大差距,对于审慎讨论口腔医疗服务可及性的伦理问题至关重要。