Borromeo V, Berrini A, Gaggioli D, Secchi C
Department of Veterinary Pathology, Hygiene and Health, Biochemistry and Physiology Unit, University of Milan, Via Celoria 10, I-20133 Milan, Italy.
Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2007 Jan 15;115(1-2):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2006.10.010. Epub 2006 Nov 15.
Heterophile antibodies (HAs) present in serum recognize animal immunoglobulins and are one of the most unpredictable causes of false results in immunoassays. However, no study has yet reported their interference on the diagnostic reliability of immunochemical analyses on horse plasma. Recently, we developed a sandwich ELISA for detection of equine growth hormone (eGH) in plasma. In a pilot study to measure basal eGH levels (blood samples were drawn from 13 horses every 10 min for 1h), we noted one horse with abnormally high eGH (>100 ng/mL). We demonstrate here that this plasma eGH level was falsely elevated due to interference from HAs. The interfering antibodies were polyspecific immunoglobulins, with fairly broad species-specificity, which affected the eGH immunoassay by bridging the mouse IgG capture antibody and the rabbit IgG conjugate. This produced artificial sandwiches which led to overestimation of the eGH plasma concentration. Spiking horse plasma with pure mouse and rabbit immunoglobulins or whole plasma of several species significantly reduced but did not totally eliminate the HAs interference. Immunoglobulins and whole plasma differed in their ability to block the interference, suggesting that HAs may recognize other proteins beside immunoglobulins in animal sera. To investigate whether HAs have any implications in equine clinical practice, we decided to seek information on the incidence of HAs interference in normal animals. We collected single plasma samples from another 114 horses and we found that 5 of these had plasma HAs. Therefore, in total 6 out of the 127 horses examined (4.7%) had plasma HAs generating falsely elevated eGH measures. In conclusion, this study provides the first evidence of HAs in horse plasma interfering with an immunoassay and indicates that veterinary surgeons and diagnostic laboratory staff should be aware of this potential for interference in tests on horse plasma using monoclonal or polyclonal antibody reagents.
血清中的嗜异性抗体(HA)可识别动物免疫球蛋白,是免疫测定中导致结果出现错误的最不可预测的原因之一。然而,尚无研究报道其对马血浆免疫化学分析诊断可靠性的干扰。最近,我们开发了一种夹心ELISA法用于检测血浆中的马生长激素(eGH)。在一项测量基础eGH水平的初步研究中(从13匹马中每隔10分钟采集一次血样,共采集1小时),我们注意到有一匹马的eGH水平异常高(>100 ng/mL)。我们在此证明,该血浆eGH水平因HA的干扰而被错误升高。干扰抗体是多特异性免疫球蛋白,具有相当广泛的物种特异性,通过桥接小鼠IgG捕获抗体和兔IgG偶联物影响eGH免疫测定。这产生了人工夹心结构,导致eGH血浆浓度被高估。向马血浆中加入纯小鼠和兔免疫球蛋白或几种物种的全血浆可显著降低但不能完全消除HA的干扰。免疫球蛋白和全血浆在阻断干扰的能力上有所不同,这表明HA可能识别动物血清中除免疫球蛋白之外的其他蛋白质。为了研究HA在马临床实践中是否有任何影响,我们决定了解正常动物中HA干扰的发生率。我们从另外114匹马中采集了单个血浆样本,发现其中5匹马的血浆中有HA。因此,在总共检查的127匹马中,有6匹(4.7%)的血浆中有HA导致eGH测量值错误升高。总之,本研究提供了马血浆中HA干扰免疫测定的首个证据,并表明兽医和诊断实验室工作人员应意识到在使用单克隆或多克隆抗体试剂检测马血浆时存在这种潜在干扰。